DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics and Health Care Spending of Persistently and Transiently High-cost Older Adults in Korea

  • Sungchul Park (Department of Health Policy and Management, Korea University College of Health Science) ;
  • Giryeon Bae (Department of Health Policy and Management, Korea University College of Health Science)
  • Received : 2023.06.12
  • Accepted : 2023.08.28
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined differences in health care spending and characteristics among older adults in Korea by high-cost status (persistently, transiently, and never high-cost). Methods: We identified 1 364 119 older adults using data from the Korean National Insurance Claims Database for 2017-2019. Outcomes included average annual total health care spending and high-cost status for 2017-2019. Linear regression was used to estimate differences in the outcomes while adjusting for individual-level characteristics. Results: Persistently and transiently high-cost older adults had higher health care spending than never high-cost older adults, but the difference in health care spending was greater among persistently high-cost older adults than among transiently high-cost older adults (US$20 437 vs. 5486). Despite demographic and socioeconomic differences between transiently high-cost and never high-cost older adults, the presence of comorbid conditions remained the most significant factor. However, there were no or small differences in the prevalence of comorbid conditions between persistently high-cost and transiently high-cost older adults. Rather, notable differences were observed in socioeconomic status, including disability and receipt of Medical Aid. Conclusions: Medical risk factors contribute to high health care spending to some extent, but social risk factors may be a source of persistent high-cost status among older adults in Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a Korea University grant (K2224171 and K2303021).

References

  1. Wammes JJ, van der Wees PJ, Tanke MA, Westert GP, Jeurissen PP. Systematic review of high-cost patients' characteristics and healthcare utilisation. BMJ Open 2018;8(9):e023113.
  2. Long P, Abrams M, Milstein A, Anderson G, Apton KL, Dahlberg M, et al. Effective care for high-need patients: opportunities for improving outcomes, value, and health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017.
  3. Park S, Park G, Chung W. Variations in healthcare spending, care access, and health status by care need: evidence from South Korea: care need in South Korea. J Gen Intern Med 2023;38(11):2623-2625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08083-w
  4. Joynt KE, Figueroa JF, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts. Healthc (Amst) 2017;5(1-2):62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.11.002
  5. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD reviews of public health: Korea; 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/health/oecd-reviews-of-public-health-korea-be2b7063-en.htm.
  6. Figueroa JF, Zhou X, Jha AK. Characteristics and spending patterns of persistently high-cost Medicare patients. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019;38(1):107-114. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05160
  7. Ng SH, Rahman N, Ang IY, Sridharan S, Ramachandran S, Wang DD, et al. Characterising and predicting persistent high-cost utilisers in healthcare: a retrospective cohort study in Singapore. BMJ Open 2020;10(1):e031622.
  8. Woolf SH. Necessary but not sufficient: why health care alone cannot improve population health and reduce health inequities. Ann Fam Med 2019;17(3):196-199. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2395
  9. Woolf SH, Braveman P. Where health disparities begin: the role of social and economic determinants--and why current policies may make matters worse. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30(10):1852-1859. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0685