DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll of Vitex rotundifolia in coastal sand dune

  • Received : 2023.07.03
  • Accepted : 2023.08.06
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Background: This study analyzed the physiological adaptations of a woody plant, Vitex rotundifolia, in Goraebul coastal sand dunes from May to September 2022. Environmental factors and physiological of plants growing under field and controlled (pot) conditions were compared. Results: Photosynthesis in plants growing in the coastal sand dunes and pots was the highest in June 2022 and July 2022, respectively. Chlorophyll fluorescence indicated the presence of stress in the coastal sand dune environment. The net photosynthesis rate (PN) and Y(II) were highest in June in the coastal sand dune environment and July in the pot environment. In August and September, Y(NPQ) increased in the plants in the coastal sand dune environment, showing their photoprotective mechanism. Chlorophyll a and b contents in the pot plant leaves were higher than those in the coastal sand dune plant leaves; however, chlorophyll-a/b ratio was higher in the coastal sand dune plant leaves than in the pot plant leaves, suggesting a relatively high photosynthetic efficiency. Carotenoid content in the coastal sand dune plant leaves was higher in August and September 2022 than that in the pot plant leaves. Leaf water and soluble carbohydrate contents of the coastal sand dune plant leaves decreased in September 2022, leading to rapid leaf abscission. Diurnal variations in photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in both environments showed peak activity at 12:00 hour; however, the coastal sand dune plants had lower growth rates and Y(II) than the pot plants. Plants in the coastal sand dunes had higher leaf water and ion contents, indicating that they adapted to water stress through osmotic adjustments. However, plants growing in the coastal sand dunes exhibited reduced photosynthetic activity and accelerated decline due to seasonal temperature decreases. These findings demonstrate the adaptation mechanisms of V. rotundifolia to water stress, poor soils, and high temperature conditions in coastal sand dunes. Conclusions: The observed variations indicate the responses of the V. rotundifolia to environmental stress, and may reveal its survival strategies and adaptation mechanisms to stress. The results provide insights into the ecophysiological characteristics of V. rotundifolia and a basis for the conservation and restoration of damaged coastal sand dunes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

All the authors are deeply grateful to Plant ecophysiology lab in Kyungpook National University, South Korea.

References

  1. Acevedo E, Hsiao TC, Henderson DW. Immediate and subsequent growth responses of maize leaves to changes in water status. Plant Physiol. 1971;48(5):631-6. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.48.5.631.
  2. Angelopoulos K, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C. Inhibition of photosynthesis in olive trees (Olea europaea L.) during water stress and rewatering. J Exp Bot. 1996;47(8):1093-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.8.1093.
  3. Arena C, Vitale L, Santo AV. Photosynthesis and photoprotective strategies in Laurus nobilis L. and Quercus ilex L. under summer drought and winter cold. Plant Biosyst. 2008;142(3):472-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500802410819.
  4. Arun AB, Beena KR, Raviraja NS, Sridhar KR. Coastal sand dunes - a neglected ecosystem. Curr Sci. 1999;77(1):19-21.
  5. Bae CY, Hwang JS, Bae JJ, Choi SC, Lim SH, Choi DG, et al. Physiological responses of Calystegia soldanella under drought stress. J Ecol Environ. 2013;36(4):255-65. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.255.
  6. Baker NR. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:89-113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759.
  7. Chaplin MF, Kennedy JF. Carbohydrate analysis: a practical approach. 2nd ed. Oxford: ILR Press; 1994.
  8. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol. 2003;30(3):239-64. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076
  9. Chylinski WK, Lukaszewska AJ, Kutnik K. Drought response of two bedding plants. Acta Physiol Plant. 2007;29(5):399-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-007-0073-y.
  10. Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Bangerth F, Jones MB. Comparative responses to water stress in stay-green, rapid- and slow senescing genotypes of the biomass crop, Miscanthus. New Phytol. 2002;154(2):335-45. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00381.x.
  11. Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Grivet C, Berry JA. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric For Meteorol. 1991;54(2-4):107-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8.
  12. Dahm J, Jenks G, Bergin D. Community-based dune management for the mitigation of coastal hazards and climate change effects: a guide for local authorities. Whakatane: Bay of Plenty Regional Council; 2005.
  13. Edwards DR, Dixon MA. Mechanisms of drought response in Thuja occidentalis L. I. Water stress conditioning and osmotic adjustment. Tree Physiol. 1995;15(2):121-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/15.2.121.
  14. Falqueto AR, Silva FSP, Cassol D, Magalhaes AM Jr, Oliveira AC, Bacarin MA. Chlorophyll fluorescence in rice: probing of senescence driven changes of PSII activity on rice varieties differing in grain yield capacity. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2010;22(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202010000100004.
  15. Flexas J, Escalona JM, Medrano H. Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Funct Plant Biol. 1998;25(8):893-900. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP98054.
  16. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol. 2008;179(4):945-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x.
  17. Gimenez C, Mitchell VJ, Lawlor DW. Regulation of photosynthetic rate of two sunflower hybrids under water stress. Plant Physiol. 1992;98(2):516-24. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.2.516.
  18. Gunderson LH. Ecological resilience-in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2000;31:425-39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425.
  19. Hesp PA. Ecological processes and plant adaptations on coastal dunes. J Arid Environ. 1991;21(2):165-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(18)30681-5.
  20. Hsiao TC, Bradford KJ. Physiological consequences of cellular water deficits. In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR, editors. Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc.; 1983. p. 227-65. https://doi.org/10.2134/1983.limitationstoefficientwateruse.c15.
  21. Hwang JS, Choo YS. Solute patterns and diurnal variation of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in Korean coastal sand dune plants. Photosynthetica. 2017;55(1):107-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-016-0232-8.
  22. Ishikawa S, Oikawa T, Furukawa A. Photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of three coastal dune plants. Ecol Res. 1990;5(3):377-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347012.
  23. Kim JE, Hong SK. Landscape ecological analysis of coastal sand dune ecosystem in Korea. J Korea Soc Environ Restor Technol. 2009;12(3):21-32.
  24. Klughammer C, Schreiber U. Complementary PS II quantum yields calculated from simple fluorescence parameters measured by PAM fluorometry and the Saturation Pulse method. PAM Appl Notes. 2008;1:27-35.
  25. Kratsch HA, Wise RR. The ultrastructure of chilling stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2000;23(4):337-50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00560.x.
  26. Krause GH, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1991;42:313-49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.001525.
  27. Kumar A, Singh DP. Use of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in Oilseed Brassica Species. Ann Bot. 1998;81(3):413-20. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0573.
  28. Kyparissis A, Drilias P, Manetas Y. Seasonal fluctuations in photoprotective (xanthophyll cycle) and photoselective (chlorophylls) capacity in eight Mediterranean plant species belonging to two different growth forms. Funct Plant Biol. 2000;27(3):265-72. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP99037.
  29. Larcher W. Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2003.
  30. Lawlor DW, Cornic G. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25(2):275-94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x.
  31. Levitt J. Responses of plant to environmental stress. Volume II: water, radiation, salt and other stresses. New York: Academic Press; 1980.
  32. Lu C, Zhang J. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition in wheat plants. Funct Plant Biol. 1998;25(8):883-92. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP98129.
  33. Mascarenhas A, Jayakumar S. An environmental perspective of the post-tsunami scenario along the coast of Tamil Nadu, India: role of sand dunes and forests. J Environ Manage. 2008;89(1):24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.053.
  34. Maun MA. Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Can J Bot. 1998;76(5):713-38. https://doi.org/10.1139/b98-058.
  35. Mooney HA, Field C, Williams WE, Berry JA, Bjorkman O. Photosynthetic characteristics of plants of a Californian cool coastal environment. Oecologia. 1983;57(1-2):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00379559.
  36. Muller P, Li XP, Niyogi KK. Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol. 2001;125(4):1558-66. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.4.1558.
  37. Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25(2):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x.
  38. Murchie EH, Lawson T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(13):3983-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert208.
  39. Pallardy SG. Physiology of woody plants. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2010.
  40. Park JM, Park CM, Ezaki T. Ecological study on the Vitex rotundifolia communities in Korea. J Jpn Soc Coast For. 2009;8(1):17-23.
  41. Pasban Eslam B, Shakiba MR, Neyshabouri MR, Moghadam M, Ahmadi MR. Evaluation of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought resistance in oilseed rape. Pak Acad Sci J. 2000;37(2):143-52.
  42. Peterson RB, Sivak MN, Walker DA. Relationship between steady-state fluorescence yield and photosynthetic efficiency in spinach leaf tissue. Plant Physiol. 1988;88(1):158-63. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.1.158.
  43. Sarijeva G, Knapp M, Lichtenthaler HK. Differences in photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll and carotenoid levels, and in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in green sun and shade leaves of Ginkgo and Fagus. J Plant Physiol. 2007;164(7):950-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.09.002.
  44. Shao HB, Chu LY, Lu ZH, Kang CM. Primary antioxidant free radical scavenging and redox signaling pathways in higher plant cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2007;4(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.4.8.
  45. Silva MA, Jifon JL, Silva JAG, Sharma V. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2007;19(3):193-201. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003.
  46. Sim YS, Yim SH, Choo YS. Photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of the evergreen Ligustrum japonicum and the deciduous Cornus officinalis. J Plant Biol. 2021;64(1):73-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-020-09284-0.
  47. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant physiology. 4th ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 2006.
  48. Ueda Y, Nishihara S, Tomita H, Oda Y. Photosynthetic response of Japanese rose species Rosa bracteata and Rosa rugosa to temperature and light. Sci Hortic. 2000;84(3-4):365-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00138-7.
  49. Wellburn AR. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol. 1994;144(3):307-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2.