Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

  • 제66권6호
  • /
  • Pages.652-663
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2005-3711(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-7876(eISSN)
대한신경외과학회 (The Korean Neurosurgical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Scalp Nerve Block on the Quality of Recovery after Minicraniotomy for Clipping of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms : A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Seungeun Choi (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Young Hoon Choi (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hoo Seung Lee (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kyong Won Shin (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon Jung Kim (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hee-Pyoung Park (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Won-Sang Cho (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyongmin Oh (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.11
  • 심사 : 2023.04.10
  • 발행 : 2023.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective : This study compared the quality of recovery (QoR) after minicraniotomy for clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) between patients with and without scalp nerve block (SNB). Methods : Patients were randomly assigned to the SNB (SNB using ropivacaine with epinephrine, n=27) and control (SNB using normal saline, n=25) groups. SNB was performed at the end of surgery. To assess postoperative QoR, the QoR-40, a patient-reported questionnaire, was used. The QoR-40 scores were measured preoperatively, 1-3 days postoperatively, at hospital discharge, and 1 month postoperatively. Pain and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption were evaluated 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours and 1-3 days postoperatively. Results : All QoR-40 scores, including those measured 1 day postoperatively (primary outcome measure; 155.0 [141.0-176.0] vs. 161.0 [140.5-179.5], p=0.464), did not significantly differ between the SNB and control groups. The SNB group had significantly less severe pain 3 (numeric rating scale [NRS]; 3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 5.0 [3.5-5.5], p=0.029), 9 (NRS; 3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0], p=0.048), and 12 (NRS; 3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0], p=0.035) hours postoperatively. The total amount of IV-PCA consumed was significantly less 3 hours postoperatively in the SNB group (2.0 [1.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0-5.0] mL, p=0.044). Conclusion : After minicraniotomy for clipping of UIAs, SNB reduced pain and IV-PCA consumption in the early postoperative period but did not improve the QoR-40 scores.

키워드

과제정보

This study was presented as an abstract from KNS 2022 (October 8, 2022, Songdo Convensia Incheon, Korea). This work was supported by a grant (number : 1120215060) from the SNUH Research Fund.

참고문헌

  1. Akcil EF, Dilmen OK, Vehid H, Ibisoglu LS, Tunali Y : Which one is more effective for analgesia in infratentorial craniotomy? The scalp block or local anesthetic infiltration. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 154 : 98-103, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.01.018
  2. Akhigbe T, Zolnourian A : Use of regional scalp block for pain management after craniotomy: review of literature and critical appraisal of evidence. J Clin Neurosci 45 : 44-47, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.08.027
  3. Altman AD, Helpman L, McGee J, Samouelian V, Auclair MH, Brar H, et al. : Enhanced recovery after surgery: implementing a new standard of surgical care. CMAJ 191 : E469-E475, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180635
  4. Apfel CC, Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roos A, Roewer N : Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 88 : 234-240, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/88.2.234
  5. Batoz H, Verdonck O, Pellerin C, Roux G, Maurette P : The analgesic properties of scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine after intracranial tumoral resection. Anesth Analg 109 : 240-244, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a4928d
  6. Bowyer AJ, Royse CF : Postoperative recovery and outcomes--what are we measuring and for whom? Anaesthesia 71 Suppl 1 : 72-77, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13312
  7. Chatterjee S, Rudra A, Sengupta S : Current concepts in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011 : 748031, 2011
  8. Cho WS, Kim JE, Kang HS, Son YJ, Bang JS, Oh CW : Keyhole approach and neuroendoscopy for cerebral aneurysms. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60 : 275-281, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0101.002
  9. de Gray LC, Matta BF : Acute and chronic pain following craniotomy: a review. Anaesthesia 60 : 693-704, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.03997.x
  10. Echeverria-Villalobos M, Stoicea N, Todeschini AB, Fiorda-Diaz J, Uribe AA, Weaver T, et al. : Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): a perspective review of postoperative pain management under ERAS pathways and its role on opioid crisis in the United States. Clin J Pain 36 : 219-226, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000792
  11. Elayat A, Jena SS, Nayak S, Sahu RN, Tripathy S : "Enhanced recovery after surgery - ERAS in elective craniotomies-a non-randomized controlled trial". BMC Neurol 21 : 127, 2021
  12. Flexman AM, Ng JL, Gelb AW : Acute and chronic pain following craniotomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 23 : 551-557, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833e15b9
  13. Gan TJ : Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res 10 : 2287-2298, 2017 https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S144066
  14. Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, et al. : Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth 111 : 161-169, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet014
  15. Gottschalk A, Yaster M : The perioperative management of pain from intracranial surgery. Neurocrit Care 10 : 387-402, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-008-9150-3
  16. Hong N, Cho WS, Pang CH, Choi YH, Bae JW, Ha EJ, et al. : Treatment outcomes of 1-stage clipping of multiple unruptured intracranial aneurysms via keyhole approaches. J Neurosurg 136 : 475-484, 2021
  17. Hwang JY, Bang JS, Oh CW, Joo JD, Park SJ, Do SH, et al. : Effect of scalp blocks with levobupivacaine on recovery profiles after craniotomy for aneurysm clipping: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study. World Neurosurg 83 : 108-113, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.05.009
  18. Janis JE, Hatef DA, Thakar H, Reece EM, McCluskey PD, Schaub TA, et al. : The zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve: part II. Anatomical variations. Plast Reconstr Surg 126 : 435-442, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e094d7
  19. Lee JH, Ki M, Choi S, Woo CJ, Kim D, Lim H, et al. : Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the quality of recovery-15 questionnaire. Korean J Anesthesiol 74 : 142-149, 2021 https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.20435
  20. Lee JH, Kim D, Seo D, Son JS, Kim DC : Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire. Korean J Anesthesiol 71 : 467-475, 2018 https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.d.18.27188
  21. Leslie K, Troedel S, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, et al. : Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology 99 : 1158-1165, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200311000-00024
  22. Liu B, Liu S, Wang Y, Zhao B, Zhao T, Zhao L, et al. : Neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme for elective craniotomies: are patients satisfied with their experiences? A quantitative and qualitative analysis. BMJ Open 9 : e028706, 2019
  23. Liu B, Liu S, Zheng T, Lu D, Chen L, Ma T, et al. : Neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery ERAS for geriatric patients undergoing elective craniotomy: a review. Medicine (Baltimore) 101 : e30043, 2022
  24. Mancel L, Van Loon K, Lopez AM : Role of regional anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 34 : 616-625, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001048
  25. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S : Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 84 : 11-15, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366
  26. Osborn I, Sebeo J : "Scalp block" during craniotomy: a classic technique revisited. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 22 : 187-194, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181d48846
  27. Park J : Superciliary keyhole approach for unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: surgical technique, indications, and contraindications. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 56 : 371-374, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.5.371
  28. Park J : Supraorbital keyhole approach for intracranial aneurysms : transitioning from concerns to confidence. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 63 : 4-13, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0042
  29. Park JS, Kwon MY, Lee CY : Minipterional craniotomy for surgical clipping of anterior circulation aneurysms: compatibility between the feasibility, safety and efficiency. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 22 : 65-77, 2020 https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2020.22.2.65
  30. Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, et al. : Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology 113 : 892-905, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9
  31. Sato K, Sai S, Adachi T : Is microvascular decompression surgery a high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy? J Anesth 27 : 725-730, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1621-9
  32. Sato T, Nishiwaki K : Accuracy of landmark scalp blocks performed during asleep-awake-asleep awake craniotomy: a retrospective study. JA Clin Rep 7 : 8, 2021
  33. Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA : Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology 118 : 1332-1340, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b
  34. Stumpo V, Staartjes VE, Quddusi A, Corniola MV, Tessitore E, Schroder ML, et al. : Enhanced recovery after surgery strategies for elective craniotomy: a systematic review. J Neurosurg 135 : 1857-1881, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.10.JNS203160
  35. Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, Broderick JP, Cockroft KM, Connolly ES Jr, et al. : Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 46 : 2368-2400, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000070
  36. Totonchi A, Pashmini N, Guyuron B : The zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve: an anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 115 : 273-277, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000145639.42257.4F
  37. Tsan SEH, Goh CH, Tan PCS : Ultrasound-guided scalp blocks for an awake craniotomy: a case report. A A Pract 16 : e01618, 2022
  38. Uribe AA, Stoicea N, Echeverria-Villalobos M, Todeschini AB, Esparza Gutierrez A, Folea AR, et al. : Postoperative nausea and vomiting after craniotomy: an evidence-based review of general considerations, risk factors, and management. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 33 : 212-220, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000667
  39. Wang L, Cai H, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen T, Liu J, et al. : Enhanced recovery after elective craniotomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 76 : 110575, 2022
  40. Wong JH, Tymianski R, Radovanovic I, Tymianski M : Minimally invasive microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 46 : 2699-2706, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008221
  41. Yang X, Ma J, Li K, Chen L, Dong R, Lu Y, et al. : A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 19 : 91, 2019
  42. Yang Y, Ou M, Zhou H, Tan L, Hu Y, Li Y, et al. : Effect of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine on postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy: a randomized, double blinded study. Sci Rep 10 : 2529, 2020
  43. Yoon S, Joo H, Oh YM, Lee J, Bahk JH, Lee HJ : Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the quality of recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth 125 : 614-621, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.040
  44. Zetlaoui PJ, Gauthier E, Benhamou D : Ultrasound-guided scalp nerve blocks for neurosurgery: a narrative review. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 39 : 876-882, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2020.06.019
  45. Zheng L, Hagan KB, Villarreal J, Keerty V, Chen J, Cata JP : Scalp block for glioblastoma surgery is associated with lower inflammatory scores and improved survival. Minerva Anestesiol 83 : 1137-1145, 2017 https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11881-X