Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance evaluation of agricultural reservoir embankment based on overtopping prevention structures installation

  • Bo Ra Yun (Department of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jung Hyun Ryu (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ji Sang Han (Department of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Dal Won Lee (Department of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2023.07.19
  • Accepted : 2023.08.29
  • Published : 2023.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, three types of structures-stepped gabion retaining walls, vertical gabion retaining walls, and parapets-were installed on the dam floor crest to prevent the overflow of deteriorative homogeneous reservoirs. The acceleration response, displacement behavior, and pore water pressure ratio behavior were compared and evaluated using shaking-table model tests. The experimental conditions were set to 0.154 g in consideration of the domestic standard and the seismic acceleration range according to the magnitude of the earthquake, and the input waveform was applied with Pohang, Gongen, and artificial earthquake waves. The acceleration response according to the design ground acceleration increased as the height of the embankment increased, and the observed value were larger in the range of 1.1 to 2.1 times the input acceleration for all structures. The horizontal and vertical displacements exhibited maximum values on the upstream slope, and the embankment was evaluated as stable and included within the allowable range for all waveforms. The settlement ratio considering the similarity law exhibited the least change in the case of the parapet structure. The amplification ratio was 1.1 to 1.5 times in all structures, with the largest observed in the dam crest. The maximum excess pore water pressure ratio was in the range of 0.010 - 0.021, and the liquefaction evaluation standard was within 1.0, which was considered very stable.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeong KB, Shibuya S, Kawabata T, Sawada Y, Nakazawa H. 2020. Seismic performance and numerical simulation of earth-fill dam with geosynthetic clay liner in shaking table test. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 48:190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.006
  2. KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration). 2020. Trends in domestic earthquakes. KMA, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean]
  3. Lee DW, Noh JJ. 2014. Behavior of failure for embankment and spillway transitional zone of agricultural reservoirs due to overtopping. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineer 56:71-79. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2014.56.1.071
  4. Lee YH, Lee DW. 2017. Effective method for remodeling of deteriorated agricultural reservoirs. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineer 59:43-52. [in Korean]
  5. Lee YH, Lee DW, Ryu JH, Kim CH, Heo J, Shim JW. 2020. An evaluation of a crushed stone filter and gabion retaining wall for reducing internal erosion of agricultural reservoirs. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 47:485-496. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20200037
  6. Lee YH, Lee TH, Lee DW. 2019. Overtopping model experiments and 3-D seepage characteristics of the embankment of deteriorated homogeneous reservoirs. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 61:13-23. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2019.61.2.013
  7. Lee YH, Ryu JH, Yoon BR, Heo J, Lee DW. 2021. Seismic performance evaluation of agricultural reservoir embankment through shaking table tests. Journal of the Korean Society Hazard Mitigation 21:151-161. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2021.21.3.151
  8. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2019. Agricultural fill dam design. KDS (Korea Design Standard) 67 10 20. MAFRA, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  9. ME (Ministry of Environment). 2019. Dam seismic design. KDS (Korea Design Standard) 54 17 00. ME, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  10. MOLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport). 2020. Seismic design general KDS (Korea Design Standard) 17 10 00. MOLIT, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  11. Nakazawa H, Shibuya S, Kataoka S, Kobayashi S, Yamashita T, Oda T, Kobayashi T, Kawabata T, Sawada Y. 2017. Investigation of residual deformation of small earth dams in full-scale shaking tests. Journal of Japan Society Civil Engineers 73:815-826.
  12. Sawada Y, Nakazawa H, Oda T, Kobayashi S, Shibuya S, Kawabata T. 2018. Seismic performance of small earth dams with sloping core zones and geosynthetic clay liners using full-scale shaking table tests. Soil and Foundations 58:519-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.01.003
  13. Sawada Y, Nakazawa H, Take WA, Kawabata T. 2019. Effect of installation geometry on dynamic stability of small earth dams retrofitted with a geosynthetic clay liner. Soil and Foundations 59:1830-1844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.08.007
  14. Shim JW, Lee YH, Lee DW. 2022. Revision and categorization of evaluation criteria for state change factors in agricultural reservoirs. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 49:707-717. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20220065