DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Competitiveness Index and Type of Offershore and Inshore Fishery by Region

연근해어업의 지역별 경쟁력 지수 및 유형

  • Seok-Kyu Kang (Department of Business Administration, Jeju National University) ;
  • Gi-Choon Kang (Department of Economics, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2023.07.02
  • Accepted : 2023.09.27
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to construct a regional-sector-fishery-offshore and inshore fishery competitiveness index, examine the types and changes of competitiveness, and derive implications by processing data of the Survey on the Current Status of Offshore and Inshore Fishery from 2013 to 2020 for this study. The main results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, considering the competitiveness of offshore and inshore fishery by region and year, Jeonnam, Jeju, and Incheon were relatively competitive. Second, considering the competitiveness of inshore fishery by region and year, we found that Jeonnam, Chungnam, Jeonbuk, and Jeju were relatively competitive. Third, looking at the types of competitiveness based on the competitiveness index in the management sector of offshore and inshore fisheries by region and year, Ulsan, Jeonnam, and Gyeongbuk were relatively competitive between 2014 and 2020. Fourth, Jeonnam and Jeju were relatively competitive between 2014 and 2020 based on the competitiveness index in the fishing sector of offshore and inshore fisheries by region and year. Fifth, we found that Jeonnam, Jeju, and Chungnam were relatively strong in the competitiveness of offshore and inshore fishery, combining the offshore and inshore fishery indexes by region and year. The results of this study have some limitation on outlier treatment, grade assignment, and weight for aggregation, so research considering these needs to be done in the future. In conclusion, the results of this study which were derived objectively and scientifically in the era of the 4th industrial revolution, when evidence-based decision-making was becoming critical, are expected to help the central or local governments determine the priority of support projects or investments.

Keywords

References

  1. 강기춘(2019), "종합지표 작성 방법 및 적용 : 우리나라 지역별 좋은 일자리 지수", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 20(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.2.153
  2. 강기춘.김명직(2014), "비관측요인모형을 이용한 종합지표 작성 및 적용", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(1), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.1.220
  3. 강기춘.김명직.하태헌(2018), "우리나라 지자체의 글로벌 경쟁력 지수 개발에 관한 연구", 산경논집, 38(4), 23-28.
  4. 강기춘.조부연(2022), "표준화 방법에 따른 지역산업 퍄급효과 비교 분석-스마트관광산업을 중심으로-", 표준인증안전학회지, 12(3), 59-75.
  5. 강석규(2013), "제주 시범바다 목장에 있어서 연구개발사업의 경제적 효과", 수산자원관리, 3(2), 61-66.
  6. 강석규(2014), "제주 시범바다목장 사업의 경제적 파급효과에 관한 연구", 탐라문화, 47, 270-297.
  7. 강석규.강기춘(2020), "지역경제파급효과 종합지표를 이용한 투자 우선순위 결정 : 근해 수산자원 증대사업 사례", 수산경영론집, 51(4), 123-136.
  8. 김연준(2018), "루마니아의 지속적인 성장을 위한 요인 분석에 관한 연구: RLQ 분석을 통한 산업별 지역 경쟁력을 중심으로", 동유럽발칸연구, 42(1), 85-109.
  9. 한국수산자원공단(2022), 2022년 연근해어업 실태조사 및 분석.