Educational Technology International

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.237-262
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How Does the Frequency of Instructor Feedback Affect Perceived Loafing and Team Performance in Team Project-Based Learning? A Moderated Mediation Approach

  • 투고 : 2023.09.03
  • 심사 : 2023.10.06
  • 발행 : 2023.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study focuses on the instructor's role in student-centered learning and aims to test the effects and moderating role of instructor feedback on perceived loafing in team project-based learning. A conditional effect model including team efficacy, perceived loafing, instructor feedback, and team performance was proposed. Data were collected from students who registered for team project-based learning courses at a university in South Korea. A total of 420 cases were subjected to moderated mediation analysis. The results demonstrated that instructor feedback was negatively related to perceived loafing and moderated the relationship between team efficacy and perceived loafing. Furthermore, instructor feedback moderated the relationship between perceived loafing and team performance. In particular, even when perceived loafing was high, students who received frequent instructor feedback were found to significantly reduce the damage to team performance. Based on these findings, the importance of instructors' facilitation in team project-based learning is discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aguinis, H., & Gotteredson, R. K. (2010). Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 776-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.686
  2. Association of American College and Universities. (2011). The LEAP vision for learning: Outcomes, practices, impact, and employers' views.
  3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 381-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
  5. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural contexts. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00092
  6. Bjorklund, S. A., Parente, J. M., & Sathianathan, D. (2004). Effects of faculty interaction and feedback on gains in student skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00799.x
  7. Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 472-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20023
  8. Brooks, C. M., & Ammons, J. L. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 78(5), 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320309598613
  9. Burbach, M., Matkin, G., Gambrell, K., & Harding, H. (2010). The impact of preparing faculty in the effective use of student teams. College Student Journal, 44(3), 752-761.
  10. Burnik, U., & Kosir, A. (2017). Industrial product design project: Building up engineering students' career prospects. Journal of Engineering Design, 28(7-9), 549-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2017.1361512
  11. DeRue, D. S., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Feltz, D. L. (2010). Efficacy dispersion in teams: Moving beyond agreement and aggregation. Personnel Psychology, 63(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01161.x
  12. Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for CSCL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00191.x
  13. Frash, R. E., Kline, S., & Stahura, J. M. (2004). Mitigating social loafing in team-based learning. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 3(4), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J172v03n04_04
  14. Fuller, M. A., Hardin, A. M., & Davison, R. M. (2006). Efficacy in technology-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 209-235. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230308
  15. George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.2307/256478
  16. Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 933-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034
  17. Goddard, R. D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.467
  18. Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beauien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819-832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
  19. Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2013). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123
  20. Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? College and career success. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  21. Hasan, B., & Ali, J. (2007). An empirical examination of factors affecting group effectiveness in information systems projects. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(2), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00139.x
  22. Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
  23. Hayes, A. (2021). PROCESS version 4.0 Macro for SPSS (Version 4.0). https://www.processmacro.org/download.html
  24. Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
  25. Huh, Y., Reigeluth, C. M., & Lee, D. (2014). Collective efficacy and its relationship with leadership in a computer-mediated project-based group work. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6112
  26. Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., & Sashittal, A. (2009). Students' perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012178
  27. Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2015). Teacher competencies for the implementation of collaborative learning in the classroom: A framework and research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 505-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9
  28. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681-706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
  29. Kim, E. (2017). A meta analysis of team based learning effects in university classes. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(22), 721-743. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.22.721
  30. Kim, H. (2019). The moderating effects of team-efficacy and collective intelligence on relationship between instructor's feedback and perceived team outcomes in collaborative learning. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 27(3), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.18230/tjye.2019.27.3.73
  31. Kim, N., & Jang, S. (2018). Development and validation of a scale for measuring teachers' feedback in learner-centered instruction. Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 30(4), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2018.30.4.511
  32. Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning: Guiding deeper inquiry. Corwin Press.
  33. Kwon, E. M. (2010). The correlation among team efficacy, interpersonal understanding, proactivity in problem solving and team performance. [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ewha Womans University.
  34. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002
  35. Maiden, B., & Perry, B. (2011). Dealing with free-riders in assessed group work: Results from a study at a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903429302
  36. McManus, J. W., & Costello, P. J. (2019). Project-based learning in computer science: A student and research advisor's perspective. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 34(3), 38-46.
  37. Mulvey, P. W., & Klein, H. J. (1998). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1), 62-87. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2753
  38. Penarroja, V., Orengo, V., & Zornoza, A. (2017). Reducing perceived social loafing in virtual teams: The effect of team feedback with guided reflexivity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(8), 424-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12449
  39. Rapp, T., Maynard, T., Domingo, M., & Klock, E. (2021). Team emergent states: What has emerged in the literature over 20 years. Small Group Research, 52(1), 68-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420956715
  40. Riebe, L., Girardi, A., & Whitsed, C. (2016). A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education. Small Group Research, 47(6), 619-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416665221
  41. Ruys, I., Van Keer, H., & Aelterman, A. (2011). Student teachers' skills in the implementation of collaborative learning: A multilevel approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1090-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.05.005
  42. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
  43. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: Support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43, 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z
  44. Velez, G., & Power, S. A. (2020). Teaching students how to think, not what to think: Pedagogy and political psychology. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(1), 388-403. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1284
  45. Wengrowicz, N., Dori, Y. J., & Dori, D. (2017). Meta-assessment in a project-based systems engineering course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1173648
  46. Whatley, J. (2012). Evaluation of a team project-based learning module for developing employability skills. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.28945/1605
  47. Wheelan, S. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328703
  48. You, J. W. (2020). Investigating important predictors for learning outcomes of team project-based learning at universities. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(21), 281-305. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.21.281