Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of bacterial β-mannanase on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients in various feedstuffs fed to growing pigs

  • Ki Beom Jang (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University) ;
  • Yan Zhao (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University) ;
  • Young Ihn Kim (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University) ;
  • Tiago Pasquetti (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University) ;
  • Sung Woo Kim (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University)
  • Received : 2023.04.26
  • Accepted : 2023.06.22
  • Published : 2023.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of β-mannanase on metabolizable energy (ME) and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of protein in various feedstuffs including barley, copra meal, corn, corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), palm kernel meal, sorghum, and soybean meal. Methods: A basal diet was formulated with 94.8% corn and 0.77% amino acids, minerals, and vitamins and test diets replacing corn-basal diets with barley, corn DDGS, sorghum, soybean meal, or wheat (50%, respectively) and copra meal or palm kernel meal (30%, respectively). The basal diet and test diets were evaluated by using triplicated or quadruplicated 2×2 Latin square designs consisting of 2 diets and 2 periods with a total of 54 barrows at 20.6±0.6 kg (9 wk of age). Dietary treatments were levels of β-mannanase supplementation (0 or 800 U/kg of feed). Fecal and urine samples were collected for 4 d following a 4-d adaptation period. The ME and ATTD of crude protein (CP) in feedstuffs were calculated by a difference procedure. Data were analyzed using Proc general linear model of SAS. Results: Supplementation of β-mannanase improved (p<0.05) ME of barley (10.4%), palm kernel meal (12.4%), sorghum (6.0%), and soybean meal (2.9%) fed to growing pigs. Supplementation of β-mannanase increased (p<0.05) ATTD of CP in palm kernel meal (8.8%) and tended to increase (p = 0.061) ATTD of CP in copra meal (18.0%) fed to growing pigs. Conclusion: This study indicates that various factors such as the structure and the amount of β-mannans, water binding capacity, and the level of resistant starch vary among feedstuffs and the efficacy of supplemental β-mannanase may be influenced by these factors.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors appreciate technical supports from Mr. Yunlong Shi, Dr. Alexandra C. Weaver, Dr. Yanbin Shen, Dr. Alysson Saraiva, Mr. Corey Ballou, and Ms. Gwendoline Voilque of Kim Lab at North Carolina State University (Raleigh, NC, USA).

References

  1. Stein HH, Shurson GC. Board-invited review: the use and application of distillers dried grains with solubles in swine diets. J Anim Sci 2009;87:1292-303. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1290
  2. Kwon WB, Kim BG. Effects of supplemental beta-mannanase on digestible Energy and metabolizable energy contents of copra expellers and palm kernel expellers fed to pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:1014-9. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0275
  3. Kim SW, Less JF, Wang L, et al. Meeting global feed protein demand: challenge, opportunity, and strategy. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2019;7:221-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014838
  4. Moita VHC, Duarte ME, Kim SW. Functional roles of xylanase enhancing intestinal health and growth performance of nursery pigs by reducing the digesta viscosity and modulating the mucosa-associated microbiota in the jejunum. J Anim Sci 2022;100:skac116. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac116
  5. Duarte ME, Zhou FX, Dutra WM, Kim SW. Dietary supplementation of xylanase and protease on growth performance, digesta viscosity, nutrient digestibility, immune and oxidative stress status, and gut health of newly weaned pigs. Anim Nutr 2019;5:351-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2019.04.005
  6. Kiarie E, Romero LF, Nyachoti CM. The role of added feed enzymes in promoting gut health in swine and poultry. Nutr Res Rev 2013;26:71-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422413000048
  7. Agyekum AK, Nyachoti CM. Nutritional and metabolic consequences of feeding high-fiber diets to swine: A Review. Engineering 2017;3:716-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.03.010
  8. Kim SW, Baker DH. Use of enzyme supplements in pig diets based on soybean meal. Pig News Information 2003;24:91N-5N. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews20033165301
  9. Passos AA, Park I, Ferket P, Heimendahl EV, Kim SW. Effect of dietary supplementation of xylanase on apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients, viscosity of digesta, and intestinal morphology of growing pigs fed corn and soybean meal based diet. Anim Nutr 2015;1:19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.02.006
  10. Kiarie EG, Steelman S, Martinez M, Livingston K. Significance of single β-mannanase supplementation on performance and energy utilization in broiler chickens, laying hens, turkeys, sows, and nursery-finish pigs: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Transl Anim Sci 2021;5:txab160. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab160
  11. Moreira LRS, Filho EXF. An overview of mannan structure and mannan-degrading enzyme systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;79:165-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1423-4
  12. Berglund J, Kishani S, de Carvalho DM, et al. Acetylation and sugar composition influence the (in)solubility of plant β-mannans and their interaction with cellulose surfaces. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2020;8:10027-40. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01716
  13. Huntley NF, Nyachoti CM, Patience JF. Lipopolysaccharide immune stimulation but not β-mannanase supplementation affects maintenance energy requirements in young weaned pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2018;9:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0264-y
  14. Park I, Pasquetti T, Kim SW. 651 Effects of dietary supplementation of β-mannanase on ileal digestibility of fiber and viscosity of jejunal digesta in nursery pigs fed corn and soybean meal-based diets [abstract]. J Anim Sci 2014;92.
  15. Chen H, Park I, Zhang S, Kim SW. 225 Supplemental effects of β-mannanase on growth performance, ileal nutrient digestibility, and gut health of nursery pigs [abstract]. J Anim Sci 2015;93.
  16. Hickmann FMW, Andretta I, Letourneau-Montminy MP, et al. β-Mannanase supplementation as an eco-friendly feed strategy to reduce the environmental impacts of pig and poultry feeding programs. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:732253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.732253
  17. Ravindran V. Feed enzymes: the science, practice, and metabolic realities. J Appl Poult Res 2013;22:628-36. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00739
  18. Adeola O. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In: Lewis AJ, Sothern LL, editors. Swine Nutrition. Second Ed. CRC Press; 2000. 906 p.
  19. Jang KB, Kim SW. Evaluation of standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in fermented soybean meal for nursery pigs using direct and difference procedures. Anim Biosci 2023;36:275-83. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0269
  20. Sanchez-Uribe P, Romera-Recio E, Cabrera-Gomez CG, et al. Effect of β-mannanase addition during whole pigs fattening on production yields and intestinal health. Animals 2022;12:3012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12213012
  21. Simon O. The mode of action of NSP hydrolysing enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract. J Anim Feed Sci 1998;7:115-23. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69959/1998
  22. Gomez-Osorio LM, Oh HG, Lee JJ. Confirmation of cage effect and prebiotic production potential of a β-mannanase, with SBM as substrate using microscopy and wet chemistry. J Agric Sci 2021;13:23-31. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v13n2p23
  23. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine: eleventh revised edition. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 2012.
  24. Kim BG, Lee JH, Jung HJ, Han YK, Park KM, Han IK. Effect of partial replacement of soybean meal with palm kernel meal and copra meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs. AsianAustralas J Anim Sci 2001;14:821-30. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.821
  25. O'Doherty JV, McKeon MP. The use of expeller copra meal in grower and finisher pig diets. Livest Prod Sci 2000;67:55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00190-1
  26. Jang YD, Kim YY. Short communication: energy values and apparent total tract digestibility coefficients of copra meal and palm kernel meal fed to growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci 2013;93:517-21. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2013-025
  27. Lee SA, Kim BG. Classification of copra meal and copra expellers based on ether extract concentration and prediction of energy concentrations in copra byproducts. J Anim Plant Sci 2017;27:34-9.
  28. Babatunde GM, Fetuga BL, Odumosu O, Oyenuga VA. Palm kernel meal as the major protein concentrate in the diets of pigs in the tropics. J Sci Food Agric 1975;26:1279-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740260906
  29. Agunbiade JA, Wiseman J, Cole DJA. Energy and nutrient use of palm kernels, palm kernel meal and palm kernel oil in diets for growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1999;80:165-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00070-X
  30. Ezieshi EV, Olomu JM. Nutritional evaluation of palm kernel meal types: 1. proximate composition and metabolizable energy values. Afr J Biotechnol 2007;6:2484-6. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2393
  31. Stein HH, Casas GA, Abelilla JJ, Liu Y, Sulabo RC. Nutritional value of high fiber co-products from the copra, palm kernel, and rice industries in diets fed to pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015;6:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0056-6
  32. Buckeridge MS. Seed cell wall storage polysaccharides: models to understand cell wall biosynthesis and degradation. Plant Physiol 2010;154:1017-23. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.158642
  33. Ahl LI, Mravec J, Jorgensen B, Rudall PJ, Ronsted N, Grace OM. Dynamics of intracellular mannan and cell wall folding in the drought responses of succulent aloe species. Plant Cell Environ 2019;42:2458-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13560
  34. Knudsen KEB. Fiber and nonstarch polysaccharide content and variation in common crops used in broiler diets. Poult Sci 2014;93:2380-93. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-03902
  35. Cosgrove DJ. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:850-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1746
  36. Scheller HV, Ulvskov P. Hemicelluloses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2010;61:263-89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112315
  37. Jackson ME, Geronian K, Knox A, McNab J, McCartney E. A dose-response study with the feed enzyme beta-mannanase in broilers provided with corn-soybean meal based diets in the absence of antibiotic growth promoters. Poult Sci 2004;83:1992-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.12.1992
  38. Sundu B, Kumar A, Dingle J. Palm kernel meal in broiler diets: effect on chicken performance and health. Worlds Poult Sci J 2006;62:316-25. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS2005100
  39. Zijlstra RT, Owusu-Asiedu A, Simmins PH. Future of NSP-degrading enzymes to improve nutrient utilization of co-products and gut health in pigs. Livest Sci 2010;134:255-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.07.017
  40. Jaworski NW, Shoulders J, Gonzalez-Vega JC, Stein HH. Effects of using copra meal, palm kernel expellers, or palm kernel meal in diets for weanling pigs. Prof Anim Sci 2014;30:243-51. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30108-X
  41. Shurson GC, Hung YT, Jang JC, Urriola PE. Measures matter-determining the true nutri-physiological value of feed ingredients for swine. Animals 2021;11:1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051259
  42. Baker JT, Duarte ME, Holanda DM, Kim SW. Friend or foe? Impacts of dietary xylans, xylooligosaccharides, and xylanases on intestinal health and growth performance of monogastric animals. Animals 2021;11:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030609
  43. Capuano E. The behavior of dietary fiber in the gastrointestinal tract determines its physiological effect. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2017;57:3543-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1180501
  44. Jang JC, Kim KH, Jang YD, Kim YY. Effects of dietary β-mannanase supplementation on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility, intestinal integrity, and immune responses in weaning pigs. Animals 2020;10:703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040703
  45. Navarro DMDL, Abelilla JJ, Stein HH. Structures and characteristics of carbohydrates in diets fed to pigs: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2019;10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0345-6
  46. Birt DF, Boylston T, Hendrich S, et al. Resistant starch: promise for improving human health. Adv Nutr 2013;4:587-601. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.113.004325
  47. Tiwari UP, Singh AK, Jha R. Fermentation characteristics of resistant starch, arabinoxylan, and β-glucan and their effects on the gut microbial ecology of pigs: A review. Anim Nutr 2019;5:217-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2019.04.003
  48. Borel P, Lairon D, Senft M, Chautan M, Lafont H. Wheat bran and wheat germ: effect on digestion and intestinal absorption of dietary lipids in the rat. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;49:1192-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/49.6.1192
  49. Hsiao HY, Anderson DM, Dale NM. Levels of β-mannan in soybean meal. Poult Sci 2006;85:1430-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.8.1430
  50. Salvatore S, Battigaglia MS, Murone E, Dozio E, Pensabene L, Agosti M. Dietary fibers in healthy children and in pediatric gastrointestinal disorders: a practical guide. Nutrients 2023;15:2208. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092208
  51. Yanez JL, Woyengo TA, Jha R, Van Kempen TATG, Zijlstra RT. Nutrient digestibility of soybean products in grower-finisher pigs. J Anim Sci 2019;97:4598-607. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz290