DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Spodoptera frugiperda Control Effects for Corn According to the Control Thresholds and Chemical Spraying Methods

열대거세미나방에 대한 옥수수의 요방제 수준 및 약제 살포방법에 따른 방제 효과 비교

  • You Kyoung Lee (Crop Foundation Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • Hyun Ju Kim (Technology Transfer Division, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • Nak Jung Choi (Crop Foundation Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • Bo Yoon Seo (Crop Foundation Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • June Yeol Choi (Jeollabuk-Do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
  • 이유경 (국립식량과학원 작물기초기반과) ;
  • 김현주 (국립식량과학원 기술지원과) ;
  • 최낙중 (국립식량과학원 작물기초기반과) ;
  • 서보윤 (국립식량과학원 작물기초기반과) ;
  • 최준열 (전라북도 농업기술원)
  • Received : 2023.03.30
  • Accepted : 2023.06.12
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

As global warming continues, the time of invasion of Spodoptera frugiperda has been advanced and the inflow rate has been increasing, leading to great increases in damage to crops. In this study, in order to minimize crop damage caused by S. frugiperda, the control period was set for corn fields through control thresholds, and the control effects according to the chemical spraying methods were investigated in forage corn filed. Even under the condition of 4% injury level during the corn silking stage, the damage rate of ear was 70%, showing an aspect of extensive damage. The economic injury level of S. frugiperda second instar larvae was shown to be 0.7 larvae per stalk, and the control threshold level was shown to be 0.6 larvae. The income was calculated by applying the corn wholesale unit price, and according to the result, even under the condition of injury level of 4%, there was a loss of KRW 895,221/10a, and the higher the injury level, the greater the decrease in income. To control S. frugiperda, the insecticidal effects of 10 single formulations registered for S. frugiperda were tested, and according to the results, four types(emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole, indoxacarb, and spinetoram) showed high insecticidal activity not lower than 93.3%, and three types (chloran- traniliprole, spinetoram, and indoxacarb) were considered to be effective in controlling S. frugiperda as they showed high residual effects through insecticidal effect persistence tests. Therefore, conventional control and aerial control were conducted twice at 7-day intervals with indoxacarb SC and chlorantraniliprol WP, which show high activity against S. frugiperda, respectively, prior to the silking of forage corn. As a result, conventional control showed higher control values, 46.3%p in the case of indoxacarb SC and 21.7%p in the case of chlorantraniliprol WP, than aerial control through the primary control. In the secondary control too, higher control values of 26.7%p in the case of indoxacarb SC and 40.4%p in the case of chlorantraniliprol WP were found in conventional control than in aerial control. Therefore, it is considered necessary to prepare measures to improve the control effects in the recent situation where alternative methods for manpower control are widely used.

기후온난화가 지속되면서 국내에도 열대거세미나방의 침입 시기가 빨라지고 유입량도 증가하여 작물에 대한 피해도 크게 증가하고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구는 열대거세미나방에 의한 작물의 피해를 최소화하고자 옥수수 포장에 요방제 수준을 통한 방제시기를 설정하고 사료용 옥수수 포장에서 약제 살포 방법에 따른 방제효과를 조사하였다. 옥수수 출사기에 피해율 4% 조건에서도 피해과율은 70%로 높은 피해 양상을 나타내었다. 열대거세미나방 2령 유충의 경제적 피해수준은 주당 0.7마리로 나타났으며, 요방제 수준은 0.6마리로 나타났다. 옥수수 도매 단가를 적용하여 소득을 산출한 결과, 피해율 4% 조건에서도 895,221원/10a 손실액이 났으며, 피해율이 높아질수록 소득 감소는 매우 큰 것으로 나타났다. 이를 방제하기 위하여 열대거세미나방에 등록된 단제 10종에 대해 살충효과를 검정한 결과, 4종 약제(에마멕틴벤조에이트, 클로란트라닐리프롤, 인독사카브, 스피네토람)에 대해 93.3% 이상의 높은 살충 활성을 나타내었으며, 약효 지속성 검정을 통해 3종 약제(클로란트라닐리프롤, 인독사카브, 스피네토람)에서 높은 잔류 효과로 열대거세미나방의 방제에 효과적인 것으로 생각된다. 따라서 열대거세미나방에 높은 활성을 나타내는 인독사카브 액상수화제, 클로란트라닐리프롤 입상수화제를 대상으로 사료용 옥수수의 출사 전에 관행방제와 항공방제를 각각 7일 간격으로 2회 실시하였다. 그 결과, 1차 방제를 통해 항공방제보다 관행방제에서 인독사카브 액상수화제 46.3%p, 클로란트라닐리프롤 입상수화제 21.7%p의 높은 방제가를 나타내었다. 2차 방제에서도 항공방제보다 관행방제에서 인독사카브 액상수화제 26.7%p, 클로란트라닐리프롤 입상수화제 40.4%p의 높은 방제가가 조사되었다. 이에 따라 인력방제 대체 수단을 많이 사용하는 최근 상황에서 방제 효과를 제고할 수 있는 방안 마련이 필요한 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 농촌진흥청 시험연구사업(PJ01534202)의 지원으로 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Bae, S. D., H. J. Kim, Y. K. Hong, and H. J. Cho, 2004: Effects of sublethal concentration of insecticides on the pupal duration, emergence, adult longevity and oviposition of tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Korean Journal Applied Entomology 43, 175-180.
  2. Dumas, P., F. Legeai, C. Lemaitre, E. Scaon, M. Orsucci, K. Labadie, S. Gimenez, A. L. Clamens, H. Henri, F. Vavre, J. M. Aury, P. Fournier, G. J. Kergoat, and E. d'Alencon, 2015: Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host-plant variants: Two host strains or two distinct species? Genetica 143, 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-015-9829-2
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & CAB International. Community-based fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) Monitoring, Early warning and Management. Training of Trainers Manual, First Edition. Digitized by Google, 112pp.
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Plant Protection Division. 2020: Manual on Integrated Fall Armyworm Management.
  5. Hardke, J. T., J. H. Temple, D. R. Leonard, and R. E. Jackson, 2011: Laboratory toxicity and field efficacy of selected insecticides against fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Florida Entomologist 94, 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0221
  6. He, F., S. Sun, H. Tan, X. Sun, C. Qin, S. Ji, X. Li, J. Zhang and X. Jiang, 2019: Chlorantraniliprole against the black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): From biochemical/physiological to demographic responses. Scientific Reports 9, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46915-0
  7. Heo, J. W., S. B. Kim, and D. S. Kim, 2021: Migratory and subsequent generation-related damage patterns of Spodoptera frugiperda in corn plants in Jeju, South Korea. Korean Journal Applied Entomology 60, 221-228.
  8. Jeong, G. Y, and Y. Y. Cho, 2022: A study on efficient methods of pesticide control using agricultural unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Internet of Things and Convergence 8, 35-40.
  9. Johnson, S. J., 1987: Migration and the life history strategy of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in the Western Hemisphere. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 8, 543-549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400022591
  10. Jung, J. K., E. Y. Kim, I. H. Kim, and B. Y. Seo, 2020: Species identification of noctuid potential pests of soybean and maize, and estimation of their annual adult emergence in Suwon, Korea. Korean Journal Applied Entomology 59, 93-107.
  11. Lee, G. S., B. Y. Seo, J. H. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. H. Song, and W. H. Lee, 2020: First report of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a new migratory pest in Korea. Korean Journal Applied Entomology 59, 73-78.
  12. Li, X. J., M. F. Wu, J. Ma, B. Y. Gao, Q. L. Wu, A. D. Chen, J. Liu, Y. Y. Jiang, B. P. Zhai, R. Early, J. W. Chapman, G. Hu, 2020: Prediction of migratory routes of the invasive fall armyworm in eastern China using a trajectory analytical approach. Pest Management Science 76, 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5530
  13. Marenco, R. J., R. E. Foster, and C. A. Sanchez, 1992: Sweet corn response to fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) damage during vegetative growth. Journal of Economic Entomology 85, 1285-1292. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/85.4.1285
  14. Moon, H. C., M. K. Choi, S. J. Jang, J. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, and H. G. Chon, 2022: The effect of temperature on the development of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Korean Journal Applied Entomology 61, 349-356.
  15. Rural Development Administration. 2022: 2021 regional income data of agricultural product, 101pp.