말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)

  • 제15권3호
  • /
  • Pages.59-67
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2005-8063(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-5854(eISSN)
한국음성학회 (Korean Society of Speech Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

연장음 길이에 따른 비유창성 정도 평가: 등간척도와 직접크기평정 비교 연구

The perceptual judgment of sound prolongation: Equal-appearing interval and direct magnitude estimation

  • 박진 (가톨릭관동대학교 언어재활학과) ;
  • 차화정 (가톨릭관동대학교 언어재활학과) ;
  • 배세진 (가톨릭관동대학교 언어재활학과)
  • Jin Park (Department of Speech Language Rehabilitation, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Hwajung Cha (Department of Speech Language Rehabilitation, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Sejin Bae (Department of Speech Language Rehabilitation, Catholic Kwandong University)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.15
  • 심사 : 2023.09.11
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 연장음의 길이에 따른 비유창성 지각 정도에 대해 각각 등간척도와 직접크기평정을 통한 청지각적 평가를 실시한 후, 두 평가의 결과치가 선형적인 또는 비선형적인 관계를 보이는지를 알아보고자 진행되었다. 이를 통해 연장음의 길이에 따른 비유창성 지각 정도에 대한 적절한 평가 방법을 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 한국어를 모국어로 하는 만 19세 이상 성인 남녀 34명(남: 9명, 여: 25명, 평균연령: 32.9세)이 평가자로 참여였다. 실험참여자는 먼저 한국어 평마찰음 /s/를 원래 길이에서 80 ms씩 연장하여 2,000 ms(i.e., 285 ms, 365 ms., ..., 2,125 ms, 2,205 ms)까지 연장 변조한 총 25개의 자극이 들어 있는 문장을 듣고, 등간척도(1-7점, 1은 '정상', 7은 '심도')로 평가하였다. 이후에 등간척도 평가 결과, '경중도'(4점)에 해당하는 음성샘플을 선정해 이를 기준 평가치(modulus)로 하여 직접크기평정을 실시하였다. 두 평가 결과치에 대한 산포도를 작성한 후, 모형 분석을 통해 두 측정치 간의 관계가 선형적(linear)인지 비선형적(curvilinear)인지 R2값을 통해 조사하였다. 연구 결과, 두 평가 결과치의 관계가 비선형적인 양상을 보이는 것으로 나타났으며 이는 연장음의 길이에 따른 비유창성 정도 평가에 있어 등간척도보다는 직접크기평정이 적절한 평가 방법임을 보여주는 결과이다.

This study aimed to propose an appropriate evaluation method for the perceived level of speech disfluency based on sound prolongation (i.e., increased duration of segments). To this end, 34 Korean-speaking adults (9 males, 25 females, average age: 32.9 yrs.) participated as raters in this study. The participants listened to sentences containing a total of 25 stimuli with the Korean voiceless fricative /s/ extended by 80-ms increments up to 2,000 ms (i.e., 285 ms, 365 ms., ..., 2,125 ms, 2,205 ms), and evaluated them using an equal-appearing interval scale (EAI, 1-7 points, where 1 represents "normal" and 7 represents "severe"). Subsequently, based on the interval-scale results, the sentence stimuli with the prolonged voiceless fricative corresponding to the mild-to-moderate level (rated as 4 points) were selected as the reference modulus for direct magnitude estimation (DME). After scatter plots were created for the two evaluation results, the relationship between the two measured mean values was analyzed using a curve estimation method for the observed data with the highest R2-value to determine whether a linear or curvilinear approximation fit the data better. A curvilinear relationship between the two evaluation results was indicated, suggesting that DME is a more appropriate evaluation method than the EAI scale for assessing the perceived level of disfluency based on sound prolongation.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구에 평가자로 참여해주신 모든 대상자에게 감사를 드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Darley, F. L., Aronson, A. E., & Brown, J. R. (1969). Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12(2), 246-269. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1202.246
  2. Duffy, J. R. (1995). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
  3. Eadie, T. L., & Doyle, P. C. (2002). Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(6), 3014-3021. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1518983
  4. Eadie, T. L., & Doyle, P. C. (2005a). Scaling of voice pleasantness and acceptability in tracheoesophageal speakers. Journal of Voice, 19(3), 373-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.04.004
  5. Eadie, T. L., & Doyle, P. C. (2005b). Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. Journal of Voice, 19(1), 1-14.
  6. Engen, T. (1971). Psychophysics: II. Scaling methods. In R. S. Woodworth, J. W. Kling, H. Schlosberg, & L. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth & Schlosberg's experimental psychology (pp. 47-86). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  7. Gosy, M., & Eklund, R. (2018). Language-specific patterns of segment prolongation in Hungarian. The Phonetician, 115, 36-52.
  8. Gregory, H. H. (2003). Stuttering therapy: Rationale and procedures. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  9. Ha, S. (2009). A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation in the perceptual judgment of hypernasality. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 14(4), 563-573.
  10. Hoodin, R. B., & Gilbert, H. R. (1989). Nasal airflows in Parkinsonian speakers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22(3), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(89)90014-2
  11. Jeon, H. S., & Jeon, H. E. (2015). Characteristics of disfluency clusters in adults who stutter. Journal of Speech-Language & Hearing Disorders, 24(1), 135-144.
  12. Jones, K., Logan, K. J., & Shrivastav, R. (2005, November). Duration, rate, and phoneme-type effects on listeners' judgments of prolongations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. San Diego, CA.
  13. Karnell, M. P., Folkins, J. W., & Morris, H. L. (1985). Relationships between the perception of nasalization and speech movements in speakers with cleft palate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2801.63
  14. Kawai, N., Healey, E. C., & Carrell, T. D. (2007). Listeners' identification and discrimination of digitally manipulated sounds as prolongations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(2), 1102-1110. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2750158
  15. Kim, H. H. (1996, February). Perceptual, acoustical, and physiological tools in ataxic dysarthria management: A case report. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Phonetic Sciences and Speech Technology Conference (pp. 9-22). Seoul, Korea.
  16. Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. R. (1998). Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(3), 1598-1608. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424372
  17. Lee, K. H. (2001). A study of Korean lenis fricatives (Doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  18. Lee, Y., Park, H., Lim, D., & Kim, G. (2022). Usefulness of direct magnitude estimation (DME) in auditory perceptual assessments measuring dysphonia severity. Journal of Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.09.001
  19. Ludlow, C. L., & Bassich, C. J. (1984). Relationship between perceptual ratings and acoustic measures of hypokinetic speech. In: M. McNeil, J. C. Rosenbek, & A. E. Aronson (Eds.), The dysarthrias: Physiology, acoustic, perception, management (pp. 163-196). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
  20. Martin, R. (1965). Direct magnitude-estimation judgments of stuttering severity using audible and audible-visible speech samples. Speech Monographs, 32(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756509375449
  21. Martin, R. R., Haroldson, S. K., & Triden, K. A. (1984). Stuttering and speech naturalness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4901.53
  22. McHenry, M. A. (1999). Aerodynamic, acoustic, and perceptual measures of nasality following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 13(4), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990599121656
  23. Metz, D. E., Schiavetti, N., & Sacco, P. R. (1990). Acoustic and psychophysical dimensions of the perceived speech naturalness of nonstutterers and posttreatment stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(3), 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5503.516
  24. Park, J., & Chung, I. (2023). Korean listeners' identification and discrimination of lengthened /s/ as prolongations. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13, 1-17.
  25. Park, J., Jun, J. P., & Chung, I. (2018). Comparison of perception of the prolonged /s/ in Korean by average adult listeners and speech-language pathologists. Audiology and Speech Research, 14(3), 184-193. https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.2018.14.3.184
  26. Prather, E. M. (1960). Scaling defectiveness of articulation by direct magnitude-estimation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 3(4), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0304.380
  27. Price, D. D., Staud, R., & Robinson, M. E. (2012). How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? II: Visual analogue scales as ratio scales: An alternative to the view of Kersten et al. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(9), 800-801. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1031
  28. Schiavetti, N. (1992). Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. In R. D. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement and management (pp. 11-34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  29. Schiavetti, N., Martin, R. R., Haroldson, S. K., & Metz, D. E. (1994). Psychophysical analysis of audiovidual judgments of speech naturalness of nonstutterers and stutterers. Journal of Speech, Hearing Research, 37(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3701.46
  30. Schiavetti, N., Metz, D. E., & Sitler, R. W. (1981). Construct validity of direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of speech intelligibility: Evidence from a study of the hearing impaired. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(3), 441-445. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2403.441
  31. Schiavetti, N., Sacco, P. R., Metz, D. E., & Sitler, R. W. (1983). Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of stuttering severity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 26(4), 568-573. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2604.568
  32. Sewall, A., Weglarski, A., Metz, D. E., Schiavetti, N., & Whitehead, R. (1999). A methodological control study of scaled vocal breathiness measurements. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 26, 168-172. https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_26_F_168
  33. Southwood, M. H. (1996). Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of naturalness and bizarreness of the dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 4(1), 13-25.
  34. Stevens, S. S. (1974). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York, NY: Wiley.
  35. Toner, M. A., & Emanuel, F. W. (1989). Direct magnitude estimation and equal appearing interval scaling of vowel roughness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 32(1), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3201.78
  36. Van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  37. Weismer, G., & Laures, J. S. (2002). Direct magnitude estimates of speech intelligibility in dysarthria: Effects of a chosen standard. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(3), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/033)
  38. Whitehill, T. L., Lee, A. S. Y., & Chun, J. C. (2002). Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/006)
  39. Yairi, E. (1990). Subtyping child stutterers for research purpose. In J. A. Cooper (Ed.), Research needs in stuttering: Roadblocks and future directions (pp. 50-57). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
  40. Zraick, R. I., & Liss, J. M. (2000). A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(4), 979-988. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4304.979