Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An analysis of English as a foreign language learners' perceptual confusions and phonemic awareness of English fricatives

  • KyungA Lee (Department of English Language Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2023.08.15
  • Accepted : 2023.09.11
  • Published : 2023.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigates perceptual confusions of English fricatives among 121 Korean elementary school English as a foreign language (EFL) learners with shorter periods of learning English. The objective is to examine how they perceive English fricative consonants and to provide educational guidelines. Two sets of English fricative identification tasks-voiceless fricatives and voiced fricatives-were administered to participants in a High Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT) setting. Their phonemic awareness of the fricatives was visualized in perceptual confusion maps via multidimensional scaling analysis. The findings are explored in terms of the impacts of Korean EFL learners' L1 linguistic aspects and a comparison with L1 learners. Learners' phonemic awareness patterns are then compared with their relative importance in speech intelligibility based on a functional load hierarchy. The results indicated that Korean elementary EFL learners recognized English fricatives in a manner largely akin to L1 learners, suggesting their ongoing acquisition progress. Additionally, the findings demonstrated that the young EFL learners possess sufficient phonemic awareness for most high functional load segments but encounter some difficulties with one high and one low functional pair. The findings of this study offer suggestions for diagnosing language learners' phonemic awareness abilities, thereby aiding in the development of practical guidelines for language instructional design and helping educators make informed decisions regarding teaching priority in L2 classes.

Keywords

References

  1. Alphablocks. (2013). Alphablocks: Learning is fun with learning blocks: CBeebies shows. Alphablocks BBC B. https://www.learningblocks.tv/alphablocks/home
  2. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.345
  3. Brown, A. (1988). Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258
  4. Catford, J. C. (1987). Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation: A systemic description of English phonology. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp. 87-100). Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
  5. Cho, M. H. (2010). Confusion in the perception of English anterior coronal consonants by Korean EFL students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(5), 460-466. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.5.460
  6. Cho, M. H., & Jeong, S. (2011, May). Perception and confusion of English vowels. Proceedings of the 2011 Spring Korea Contents Association Conference (pp. 353-354).
  7. Choe, S., Lee, K., & So, Y. (2020). The effects of phonemic awareness instructions on L2 listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(4), 1158-1546.
  8. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research (Vol. 42). John Benjamins.
  9. Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171(3968), 303-306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3968.303
  10. Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
  11. Fayer, J. M., & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37(3), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00573.x
  12. Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6
  13. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3-83). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0040
  15. Fripp, G. (2023). Overall similarities (OS) perceptual maps template. PerceptualMaps. https://www.perceptualmaps.com
  16. Georgiou, G. P. (2019). Bit and beat are heard as the same: Mapping the vowel perceptual patterns of Greek-English bilingual children. Language Sciences, 72, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.001
  17. Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866-877. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196
  18. Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267-3278. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2062307
  19. Johnson, K. (2011). Acoustic and auditory phonetics. Wiley-Blackwell.
  20. Kang, O., & Moran, M. (2014). Functional loads of pronunciation features in nonnative speakers' oral assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.152
  21. Kang, O., & Pickering, L. (2013). Acoustic and temporal analysis for assessing speaking. The Companion to Language Assessment, 2, 1047-1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla056
  22. Lambacher, S., Martens, W., Nelson, B., & Berman, J. (2001). Identification of English voiceless fricatives by Japanese listeners: The influence of vowel context on sensitivity and response bias. Acoustical Science and Technology, 22(5), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.22.334
  23. Lee, K. (2021). Effects of phonemic awareness instruction on listening comprehension for EFL learners in a Korean elementary school [Unpublished master's thesis]. Seoul National University.
  24. Lim, Y., & Jang, W. (2019). Speech perception of English fricatives by Korean young learners of English based on L2 acquisition theories. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 27(1), 88-111.
  25. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242-1255. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177
  26. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874-886. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649
  27. Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 27, 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526
  28. Morrison, G. S. (2003, August). Perception and production of Spanish vowels by English speakers. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1533-1536).
  29. Mueller, C. M. (2019). Which English sounds are difficult? Japanese EFL learners' intuitions versus their performance. The Language Teacher, 43(2), 3-8.
  30. Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W. (2006). Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1684-1696. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2161427
  31. Rhee, S. C., Chang, J. W., Kim, T. K., Kim, J., Jang, Y. J., Sung, J. H., Rhim, S. K., & Kim, C. (2008). A comparative study on distribution of acoustic cues for Korean /ㅅ/ and /ㅆ/ distinction by native and non-native speakers of Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language, 24(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.24.2.200808.261
  32. Shepard, R. N. (1972). Psychological representation of speech sounds. In E. E. David, & P. B. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view (pp. 67-113). McGraw-Hill.
  33. Snow, C. (2014). Relevance of the notion of a critical period to language acquisition. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Sensitive periods in development: Interdisciplinary perspectives(pp. 201-228). Psychology Press.
  34. Suzukida, Y., & Saito, K. (2021). Which segmental features matter for successful L2 comprehensibility? Revisiting and generalizing the pedagogical value of the functional load principle. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 431-450.
  35. Thomson, R. I. (2018a). English accent coach. EnglishAccentCoach. https://englishaccentcoach.com
  36. Thomson, R. I. (2018b). High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT): A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 208-231. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
  37. Wong, J. W. S. (2014, September). The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels /ɪ/ and /iː/ by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association(pp. 524-528).
  38. Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.2307/747800
  39. Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.54.2.2