DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Airport Safety Performance Indicators and Index - The Case of Incheon Airport Airside -

  • In Kie Na (Incheon International Airport Corporation) ;
  • Yu-Jin Choi (Incheon International Airport Corporation)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.08
  • 심사 : 2023.09.11
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30

초록

An indicator system is an effective way to monitor ongoing safety status. Current aviation safety measurements account for many qualitative technical and lagging indicators. Conversely, quantitative and leading indicators have only a tiny proportion. This research added more quantitative leading indicators and reviewed them to harmonize lagging and leading indicators to measure airport safety and provide an index. The South Korean national gate, Incheon International Airport's indicators, were applied as primary data to verify this research practically. Then, examples from International and national authorities were reviewed and extracted for use. Fifty-five safety specialists participated in the focus group discussion and three rounds of the Delphi survey. Finally, 51 sub-indicators were newly chosen. After this process, weights for each indicator could be assigned using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) to provide an integrated index. The result of the simulation with newly added indicators in the past five years (2020-2022) reliable trend showed in indicators and integrated index. Moreover, this allows monitoring the status of the details of indicators and holistic insight. This study considered that it is more suitable for a single company or service provider to use it according to the exact situation than in a macro- and general-purpose at the country or regional level.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by a grant from the Incheon International Airport Corporation (Research on improving the evaluation of flight safety indicators and indexes at Incheon Airport).

참고문헌

  1. Liou, J. J., Tzeng, G. H., and Chang, H. C., "Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model", Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4), 2007, pp.243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.008
  2. Knegtering, B., and Pasman, H. "The safety barometer: How safe is my plant today? Is instantaneously measuring safety level utopia or realizable?", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(4), 2013, pp.821-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.02.012
  3. ICAO, "Annex 19, Safety Management", Montreal, 2016, p.40.
  4. ICAO, "Doc9859, Safety Management Manual", Montreal, 2018, pp.60-61.
  5. ACI, "Guide to Airport Performance Measures", Montreal, 2012, pp.16-20.
  6. EASA, "The European plan for Aviation safety", 2022, pp.77-87.
  7. FAA ACRP, "Report 19A: Resource Guide to Airport Performance Indicators", 2011, pp. 213-227.
  8. Belgian Civil Aviation Authority, "ANNEX 9.2 Belgian Aviation Safety Programme", 2015, pp.10-29.
  9. The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency, "Finnish Aviation Safety Objectives and Safety Performance Indicators and Targets", 2018, pp.13-40.
  10. The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, "Singapore State Safety Program", 2018, pp.25-36.
  11. Incheon International Airport Corporations, "Incheon Airport Safety Performance Indicators", 2016, pp.3-5.
  12. Lingard, H., Hallowell, M., Salas, R., and Pirzadeh, P. "Leading or lagging? temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project", Safety Science, 91, 2017, pp.206-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.020
  13. Hallowell, M. R., Bhandari, S., and Alruqi, W., "Methods of safety prediction: Analysis and integration of risk assessment, leading indicators, precursor analysis, and safety climate", Construction Management and Economics, 38(4), 2020, pp.308-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1598566
  14. Oster Jr, C. V., Strong, J. S., and Zorn, C. K.. "Analyzing aviation safety: Problems, challenges, opportunities", Research in Trans- portation Economics, 43(1), 2013, pp.148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.12.001
  15. Reason, J. "Human Error". Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  16. Zohar, D. "Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications", Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 1980, p.96.
  17. Wood, R., and Bandura, A. "Social cognitive theory of organizational management", Aca- demy of Management Review, 14(3), 1989, pp.361-384. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279067
  18. Ajzen, I, "Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior", McGraw-Hill Education, UK, 2005.
  19. Fugas, C. S., Silva, S. A., and Melia, J. L., "Another look at safety climate and safety behavior: Deepening the cognitive and social mediator mechanisms", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 2012, pp.468-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.013
  20. Brown, K. A., Willis, P. G., and Prussia, G. E., "Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: Development and test of a sociotechnical model", Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 2000, pp.445-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00033-4
  21. Hofmann, D. A., Jacobs R., and Landy, F., "High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance." Journal of Safety Research, 26(3), 1995, pp.131-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(95)00011-E
  22. Piers, M., Montijn, C., and Balk, A. "Safety Culture Framework for the ECAST SMSWG". European Commercial Aviation Safety Team (ECAST), 2009.
  23. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H., "The knowledge-creating company", Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 2007, p.162.
  24. Barling, J., Loughlin, C., and Kelloway, E. "Development and test of a model linking safety specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Safety Specific Transformational Leadership and Occupational Safety", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 2002, pp.488-496. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.488
  25. de Koster., R.B. Stam, D., and Balk, B.M. "Accidents happen: The influence of safety-specific transformational leadership, safety consciousness, and hazard reducing systems on warehouse accidents", Journal of Operations Management 29(7-8), 2011, pp. 753-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.005
  26. Kelloway, E. K., Mullen, J., and Francis, L., "Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 11, 2006, pp.76-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.76
  27. Griffin, M. A., and Neal, A., "Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5, 2000, pp.347 -358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  28. Hofmann, D. A., and Stetzer, A., "A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents", Personnel Psychology, 49, 1996, pp.307-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01802.x
  29. Neal, A., and Griffin, M. A. "Safety climate and safety behavior", Australian Journal of Management, Special Issue, 2002, pp.67-76.
  30. Gressgard, L. J., "Knowledge management and safety compliance in a high-risk distributed organizational system", Safety and Health at Work, 2014, 5(2), pp.53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.03.002
  31. Hon C K., Chan A P., and Yam M C, "Relationships between safety climate and safety performance of building repair, maintenance, minor alteration, and addition (RMAA) works", Safety Science, 65, 2014, pp.10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.12.012
  32. Jiang, L., and Probst, T. M., "Transformational and passive leadership as cross-level moderators of the relationships between safety knowledge, safety motivation, and safety participation", Journal of Safety Research, 57, 2016, pp.27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.03.002
  33. Borman, W. C., and Motowidlo, S. M., "Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations", San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993, p.71.
  34. ISO 22301, "Security and Resilience-Business Continuity Management Systems-Requirements", Switzerland, 2019, pp.1-30.
  35. In Kie Na, "A study on the relationship of airport safety management system and airside workers' behaviour", Ph.D Thesis, Korea Aerospace University, Deogyang-gu, Goyangsi, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 31 August 2019.
  36. Dalkey, N.C., 1968. "Experiments in Group Prediction (p.0014)", Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation.
  37. Gargon, E., Crew, R., Burnside, G., and Williamson, P. R., "Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 108, 2019, pp. 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.010
  38. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., and Gustafson, D. H., "Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes", Scott, Foresman, 1975.1.
  39. Rowe, G., and Wright, G., "Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique. Principles of Forecasting: A Hand- book for Researchers and Practitioners", 2001, pp.125-144.
  40. Baker, J., Lovell, K., and Harris, N., "How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of 'expert' within Delphi panel techniques", Nurse Researcher, 2006, 14(1), pp.59-70. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010
  41. Keeney, S., Hasson, F., and McKenna, H. P., "A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing", Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 2001, 38, pp.195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00044-4
  42. Yi, Y. K., Yoo, K. E., and Park, S. S., "A study on the competitiveness evaluation index development of global aviation training organizations", Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 23(1), 2015, pp.74-84. https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2015.23.1.074
  43. Lawshe, C. H., "A quantitative approach to content validity", Pers. Psychol, 28, 1975, pp.563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  44. Nicolaidou, O., Dimopoulos, C., Varianou-Mikellidou, C., Mikellides, N., and Boustras, G., "Weak signals management in occupational safety and health: A Delphi study", Safety Science, 105558, 2022, p.146.
  45. Tran, T., Trinh, T. P. T., Le, C. M., Hoang, L. K., and Pham, H. H., "Research as a base for sustainable development of universities: Using the Delphi method to explore factors affecting international publishing among Vietnamese academic staff", Sustainability, 12(8), 2020, p.3449.
  46. Soltanifar, M., and Lotfi, F. H., "The voting analytic hierarchy process method for discriminating among efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(4), 2011, pp.585-592.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.12.016