DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving the Quality of Bibliographic Data in Public Libraries: Focusing on Public Libraries in Busan Metropolitan City

공공도서관 서지데이터의 품질 제고 방안

  • 노지현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이은주 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.08.21
  • Accepted : 2023.09.02
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

In 2020, the Busan metropolitan library took the lead in establishing an integrated library system (ILS) that integrates bibliographic data from 49 public libraries and 103 small public libraries. However, each library still builds bibliographic data individually and repeatedly, and the bibliographic data built by each library is only physically stored in an integrated DB. Therefore the improvement in work efficiency or data quality has not been achieved. This study aimed to analyze the construction processes and quality of bibliographic data in Busan public libraries and to suggest a new implementation strategy for an integrated environment. To this end, (1) the construction process of bibliographic data was investigated, (2) the quality of the constructed bibliographic data was objectively analyzed, and (3) four implementation strategies were suggested based on critical problems. The implementation strategy aims not only to improve the quality of bibliographic data, but also to increase work efficiency and build an infrastructure for data sharing.

부산지역에서는 2020년 대표도서관을 중심으로 모든 도서관이 공동으로 사용할 통합도서관시스템(ILS)을 구축하고, 지역 내 49개 공공도서관과 103개 공립작은도서관의 서지데이터를 통합하였다. 그러나 각 도서관은 여전히 개별적으로 서지데이터를 구축하고 있고, 각 도서관에서 구축한 서지데이터는 물리적으로만 통합되어 있을 뿐 통합환경을 활용한 업무효율이나 데이터의 고품질화를 이루지 못하고 있다. 이러한 배경에서, 이 연구는 부산지역 공공도서관의 서지데이터 구축체계와 품질을 분석하고 통합환경에 적합한 새로운 실행전략을 제안하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 (1) 부산지역 공공도서관에서 서지데이터를 구축하는 방식을 조사하고, (2) 구축된 서지데이터의 품질을 객관적으로 분석하였으며, (3) 발견된 주요 문제점을 토대로 4가지 실행전략을 제안하였다. 이 연구에서 제안하는 실행전략은 서지데이터의 품질 제고 뿐만 아니라 업무효율과 데이터 공유를 위한 기반 구축을 동시에 실현하는 것을 목표로 하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Busan Metropolitan Library (2023). Available: https://library.busan.go.kr/busanlibrary/ 
  2. Kim, Sun Ae & Lee, Soosang (2006). Quality evaluation of a shared cataloging DB: the case of KOLIS-NET. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(1), 95-117.  https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.095
  3. Korea Database Agency (2000). The Standardization of the Quality Evaluation Item on Database. Seoul: Korea Database Agency. 
  4. Lee, Jae Whoan (2002). Quality evaluation and management of a shared cataloging DB: the case of KERIS UNICAT DB. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(1), 61-89.  https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.1.061
  5. National Information Society Agency (2018). Open Government Data Quality Management Manual v2.0. Daegu: National Information Society Agency. 
  6. Park, Jin Ho (2018). Developing an assessment model of library open data quality. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(1), 33-59. https://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.1.033 
  7. Presidential Committee on Library and Information Policy of Korea (2023). National Library Statistics System. Available: https://www.libsta.go.kr/main 
  8. Rho, Jee-Hyun & Lee, Eun Ju (2018). Current status of holdings data in Korean libraries and proposal for revision of KORMARC format for holdings data. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 93-117. https://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.201812.93 
  9. Yang, Suwan (2020). Quality diagnosis of library-related open government data: focused on book details API of Data for Library. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(4), 181-206. https://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2020.37.4.181
  10. Kyprianos, K., Lolou, E., & Efthymiou, F. (2022). Cataloging quality and the views of catalogers in Hellenic Academic Libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 60(8), 683-707.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2022.2110345
  11. Snow, K. (2011). A Study of the Perception of Cataloging Quality Among Catalogers in Academic Libraries. Denton: University of North Texas.