DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Which is the More Important Factor for Users' Adopting the Serious Games for Health? Effectiveness or Safety

건강 기능성 게임의 확산을 위한 유통 전략 연구: 유효성과 안전성에 대한 사용자 인식을 중심으로

  • Yong-Young Kim (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2023.08.23
  • Accepted : 2023.09.20
  • Published : 2023.09.28

Abstract

Interest in Serious Games for Healthcare (SGHs) that can improve health through games is increasing. Digital Therapeutics (DTx) is a treatment that must be approved for effectiveness and safety, so it should follow the traditional drug distribution method, but SGHs are wellness products that are more flexible in terms of adoption and diffusion than DTx. SGHs are effective because it can provide customized services through continuous monitoring and feedback. When SGHs are applied to cognitive impairment treatment or behavioral correction, malfunctions and side effects are minor. This study developed research model based on the Valence Framework, gathered data from 142 undergraduates, and demonstrated that only the perceived benefits have a statistically significant positive (+) effect on SGHs acceptance intentions. Based on these results, this study suggests that SGHs companies should promote benefits in accepting SGHs for general users and they need for a distribution and analytics platform strategy based on a data-driven approach.

게임을 통해 건강을 증진할 수 있는 건강 기능성 게임(SGHs)에 대한 관심이 고조되고 있다. 디지털 치료제(DTx)는 유효성과 안전성을 확보한 치료제이기 때문에 전통적인 의약품 유통방식을 따라야 하지만, SGHs는 웰니스 제품으로 DTx에 비해 보급과 확산이 유연하다. 또한 SGHs는 일시적인 치료 효과가 아닌 지속적인 모니터링과 피드백을 통해 맞춤형 서비스를 제공할 수 있어 효과적이며, SGHs를 인지장애치료나 행동교정 등에 적용할 경우 오작동과 부작용이 경미하다. 본 연구는 SGHs의 지각된 혜택과 위험을 동시에 고려하는 밸런스 프레임워크(Valence Framework)를 기반으로 142명의 학부생을 대상으로 설문을 수집하여 지각된 혜택만이 SGHs 사용 의도에 통계적으로 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 준다는 점을 실증하였다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 일반 사용자를 대상으로 한 SGHs 수용에 있어 혜택(유효성)을 중심으로 홍보하고, 데이터 주도형 (data-driven) 접근방법의 중요성과 데이터 주도형 유통 및 분석 플랫폼 전략의 필요하다는 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. J.S. Oh & J.H. Chung(2023). Introduction to Digital Therapeutics. Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 66(3), 147-155. DOI : 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2022.00542
  2. C.C. Abt(1970). Serious Games, The Viking Press.
  3. E. Choi, E.-H. Yoon, & M.-H. Park(2022). Game-based Digital Therapeutics for Children and Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. DOI : 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.986687
  4. P. Goldsmith, One Size Doesn't Fit All: A New Age in Healthcare, Closed Loop Medicine, 2022.
  5. B. Kappe, Digital Therapeutics (DTx), Orthogonal, 2022.
  6. T. Park & J. Nam(2017). The Effects of Perceived Interactivity on Information Acceptance in Mobile Health Information Service. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 151-177. DOI : 10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.151
  7. Y. Yi & B. Bae(2017). An Analysis of Non-users of Mobile Healthcare Applications. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(1), 135-154. DOI : 10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.1.135
  8. S. Kim & S. Yang(2023). Factors Influencing Acceptance Resistance of Personal Health Record Apps. Information Systems Review, 25(1), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2023.25.1.165
  9. D.J. Kim, D.L. Ferrin, & H.R. Rao(2009). Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237-257. DOI : 10.1287/isre.1080.0188
  10. V. Wattanasoontorn, I. Boada, R. Garcia, & M. Sbert(2013). Serious Games for Health. Entertainment Computing, 4(4), 231-247. DOI : 10.1016/j.entcom.2013.09.002
  11. H. Kacak(2022). Using Digital Games as a Strategic Tool to Reinforce Positive Health Behaviour. Journal of Strategic Management Research, 5(2), 196. DOI : 10.54993/syad.1167217
  12. W. Peng & M. Liu(2009). An Overview of Using Electronic Games for Health Purposes, in Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. R.E. Ferdig, Editor, IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 388-401. DOI : 10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch023
  13. J.P. Peter & L.X. Tarpey, Sr.(1975). A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29-37. DOI : 10.1086/208613
  14. Z. Gong, Z. Han, X. Li, C. Yu, & J.D. Reinhardt (2019). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Online Health Consultation Services. Frontiers in Public Health, 7(286), 1-9. DOI : 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00286
  15. M. Yang, J. Jiang, M. Kiang, & F. Yuan(2022). Re-Examining the Impact of Multidimensional Trust on Patients' Online Medical Consultation Service Continuance Decision. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(3), 983-1007. DOI : 10.1007/s10796-021-10117-9
  16. L. van Velsen, M. Tabak, & H. Hermens(2017). Measuring Patient Trust in Telemedicine Services. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 97, 52-58. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.009
  17. M.S. Featherman & P.A. Pavlou(2003). Predicting e-Services Adoption. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474. DOI : 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
  18. C. Fornell & D.F. Larcker(1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI : 10.2307/3151312
  19. D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, & M.-C. Boudreau(2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression. Communications of the AIS, 4(7), 1-77. DOI : 10.17705/1CAIS.00407
  20. L.A. Hayduk(1987). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI : 10.1002/nur.4770110511
  21. L.-t. Hu & P.M. Bentler(1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. DOI : 10.1080/10705519909540118
  22. J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, & R.L. Tatham(2006). Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed, Pearson Prentice Hall
  23. J.B.E.M. Steenkamp & H.C.M. van Trijp(1991). The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283-299. DOI : 10.1016/0167-8116(91)90027-5
  24. V.A. Clarke, H. Lovegrove, A. Williams, & M. Machperson(2000). Unrealistic Optimism and the Health Belief Model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(4), 367-376 DOI : 10.1023/a:1005500917875
  25. J. Kim & Y. Doh(2014). Generation Gap between Adolescents Group and Parents Group in the Perceptions on Online Games. Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue, 20(3), 263-280. UCI : G704-000654.2014.20.3.003 G704-000654.2014.20.3.003
  26. U. Lee, et al.(2023). Toward Data-Driven Digital Therapeutics Analytics. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(1), 42-66. DOI : 10.1109/JAS.2023.123015