DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Production of Spirometer 'The Spirokit' and Performance Verification through ATS 24/26 Waveform

휴대형 폐기능 검사기 'The Spirokit'의 제작 및 ATS 24/26파형을 통한 성능검증

  • Byeong-Soo Kim (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daejeon University) ;
  • Jun-Young Song (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daejeon University) ;
  • Myung-Mo Lee (Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon University)
  • 김병수 (대전대학교 물리치료학과 대학원) ;
  • 송준영 (대전대학교 물리치료학과 대학원) ;
  • 이명모 (대전대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2022.12.19
  • Accepted : 2023.02.13
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Background: This study aims to examine the useful- ness of the portable spirometer "The Spirokit" as a clinical diagnostic device through technology introduction, precision test, and correction. Design: Technical note Methods: "The Spirokit" was developed using a propeller-type flow rate and flow rate measurement method using infrared and light detection sensors. The level of agreement between the Pulmonary Waveform Generator and the measured values was checked to determine the precision of "The Spirokit", and the correction equation was included using the Pulmonary Waveform Generator software to correct the error range. The analysis was requested using the ATS 24/26 waveform recognized by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety and the American Thoracic Society for the values of Forced Voluntary Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1second (FEV1), and Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), which are used as major indicators for pulmonary function tests. All tests were repeated five times to derive an average value, and FVC and FEV1 presented accuracy and PEF presented accuracy as the result values. Results: FVC and FEV1 of 'The Spirokit' developed in this study showed accuracy within ± 3% of the error level in the ATS 24 waveform. The PEF value of 'The Spirokit' showed accuracy within the error level ± 12% of the ATS 26 waveform. Conclusion: Through the results of this study, the precision of 'The Spirokit' as a clinical diagnosis device was identified, and it was confirmed that it can be used as a portable pulmonary function test that can replace a spirometer.

Keywords

References

  1. 식품의약품안전청. 진단폐활량계의 허가 및 기술문서 작성을 위한 가이드라인. 식품의약품안전처;2012 
  2. 이인광, 박미정, 김경옥 등. 진단폐활량계 성능검증을 위한 장치의 정확도 평가. 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집. 2015:1429-30. 
  3. 이인광, 박미정, 이상봉 등. 호흡기류 계측모듈의 교정과 성능 비교를 위한 실용적인 표준기류 생성 시스템. 의공학회지. 2015;36(4):115-22.  https://doi.org/10.9718/JBER.2015.36.4.115
  4. Adeloye D, Agarwal D, Barnes PJ, et al. Research priorities to address the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the next decade. Journal of global health. 2021;11:15003. 
  5. Ardekani MA, Nafisi VR, Farhani F. Extrapolation of Calibration Curve of Hot-wire Spirometer Using a Novel Neural Network Based Approach. Journal of medical signals and sensors. 2012;2(4):185-91.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2228-7477.110317
  6. Carta R, Turgis D, Hermans B, et al, editors. A Differential Pressure Approach to Spirometry. 2007 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference; 2007 27-30 Nov. 2007. 
  7. Coughlin S, Parrott H, Wells C, et al, Sonnappa S, Fleming L. Acceptability of Home Spirometry in Children with Asthma: The NuvoAir Platform. TP67 TP067 SYMPTOMS, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND CAREGIVER ENGAGEMENT IN PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP: American Thoracic Society; 2021. p. A3188-A. 
  8. Feng Y, Wang Y, Zeng C, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Chronic Airway Diseases: Focus on Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. International journal of medical sciences. 2021;18(13):2871-89.  https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.58191
  9. Ge Y, Ming J, Feary J, et al. P77 Outcomes in pandemic asthma diagnostics with home spirometry. Thorax. 2021;76(Suppl 2):A109. 
  10. Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, et al. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2019;200(8):e70-e88.  https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST
  11. Grant T, Croce E, Matsui EC. Asthma and the social determinants of health. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. 2022;128(1):5-11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.002
  12. Hegewald MJ, Gallo HM, Wilson EL. Accuracy and quality of spirometry in primary care offices. 2016;13(12):2119-24.  https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-418OC
  13. Kaplan A, Cao H, Fitz Gerald JM, et al. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning in Respiratory Medicine and Potential Role in Asthma and COPD Diagnosis. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2021;9(6):2255-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.014
  14. Kocks JWH, Andringa HJH, van Heijst E, et al. Aeroallergen sensitization for detecting asthma in primary care: A diagnostic test accuracy study. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. 2021;51(8):1080-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13888
  15. Lefebvre Q, Vandergoten T, Derom E, et al. Testing spirometers: are the standard curves of the American Thoracic Society sufficient? 2014;59(12):1895-904.  https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02918
  16. Malmberg LP, Hedman J, Sovijarvi ARA. Accuracy and repeatability of a pocket turbine spirometer: comparison with a rolling seal flow-volume spirometer. Clinical Physiology. 1993;13(1):89-98.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.1993.tb00320.x
  17. Nozu Y, Ming-Ho Y, Tatsum M, et al. Utility of the Hot-Wire Spirometer. The Annals of physiological anthropology. 1991;10(2):77-82.22.  https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs1983.10.77
  18. Peak MJ, Peak JG. Convex Curvatures of alkaline elution profiles of DNA from human cells irradiated with 405nm : evidence for induction of slowly developing Alkali-Labile sites. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 1989;50(3):379-83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb04173.x
  19. Plaut DI, Webster JG. Ultrasonic Measurement of Respiratory Flow. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1980;BME-27(10):549-58.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1980.326576
  20. Rodriguez-Olivares NA, Nava-Balanzar L, Barriga-Rodriguez L. Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 2021;70:1-10.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3116307
  21. Saputra AJ, Widyastuti K, Sutanto YS. New GOLD COPD Guideline 2019: How We Deal with It? (Inhaled Corticosteroid Use and Blood Eosinophil Count). Respiratory Science. 2021;1(2):79-87.  https://doi.org/10.36497/respirsci.v1i2.13
  22. Schermer TR, Verweij EH, Cretier R, et al. Accuracy and precision of desktop spirometers in general practices. 2012;83(4):344-52.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000334320
  23. Sokol YI, Tomashevsky RS, Kolisnyk KV, editors. Turbine spirometers metrological support. 2016 International Conference on Electronics and Information Technology (EIT); 2016 23-27 May 2016. 
  24. Walters JAE, Wood-Baker R, Walls J, et al. Stability of the EasyOne ultrasonic spirometer for use in general practice. Respirology. 2006;11(3):306-10.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00842.x