DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

석탄화력발전소 호흡성분진 작업환경 평가 전략 사례에 관한 연구

A Study on Occupational Environment Assessment Strategies for Respirable Particulate Matter at Coal-Fired Power Plants

  • 투고 : 2023.07.24
  • 심사 : 2023.09.07
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30

초록

Objectives: Coal-fired power plants feature diverse working conditions, including multi-layered employment structures and irregular work cycles due to outsourcing and non-standardized tasks. The current uniform occupational environment measurement systems have limitations in accurately assessing and evaluating these varied conditions. This study aims to propose alternative measurement and assessment strategies to supplement existing methods. Methods: Major domestic coal-fired power plants were selected as the study targets. To prepare for the study and establish strategies, work processes were identified and existing occupational environment measurement results were compared and analyzed. The study proceeded by employing three strategies: specific exposure groups (SEGs) measurement, continuous monitoring, and supplementary measurements, which were then compared and discussed. Results: Previous exposure index evaluations (5,268 cases) indicated that crystalline silica, a type of respirable particulate matter, had detection limits below the threshold (non-detectable) in 82.6% (4,349 cases) of instances. Exposures below 10% of the exposure limit were observed at a very low concentration of 96.1%. Similar exposure group measurements yielded results where detection limits were below the threshold in 38.2% of cases, and exposures below 10% of the limit were observed in 70.6%. Continuous monitoring indicated detection limits below the threshold in 12.6% of cases, and exposures below 10% of the limit were observed in 75.6%. Instances requiring active workplace management accounted for more than 30% of cases, with SEGs at 11.8% (four cases), showing a higher proportion compared to 3.0% (four cases) in continuous monitoring. For coal dust, exposures below 10% of the limit were highest in legal measurements at 90.2% (113 cases), followed by 74.0% (91 cases) in continuous monitoring, and 47.0% (16 cases) in SEGs. Instances exceeding 30% were most prevalent in SEGs at 14.7% (five cases), followed by legal measurements at 5.0% (eight cases), and continuous monitoring at 2.4% (three cases). When examining exposure levels through arithmetic means, crystalline silica was found to be 104.7% higher in SEGs at 0.0088 mg/m3 compared to 0.0043 mg/m3 in continuous monitoring. Coal dust measurements were highest in SEGs at 0.1247 mg/m3, followed by 0.1224 mg/m3 in legal measurements, and 0.0935 mg/m3 in continuous monitoring. Conclusions: Strategies involving SEGs measurement and continuous monitoring can enhance measurement reliability in environments with irregular work processes and frequent fluctuations in working conditions, as observed in coal-fired power plants. These strategies reduce the likelihood of omitting or underestimating processes and enhance measurement accuracy. In particular, a significant reduction in detection limits below the threshold for crystalline silica was observed. Supplementary measurements can identify worker exposure characteristics, uncover potential risks in blind spots of management, and provide a complementary method for legal measurements.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACGIH. TLVs and BEIs - Based on the documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for chemical substances and physical agents and Biological Exposure Indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hyg.; 2020.
  2. Bird MJ, Maclntosh DL, Williams PL. Occupational exposure during routine activities in coal-fired power plants. Occu Environ Hyg 2004;1:403-413 https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620490453346
  3. Engelbrecht J, Tau P, Hongoro C. Occupational health hazards of fabric bag filter workers' expousure to coal fly Ash. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 2012;4(3):57-64
  4. Hicks J, Yager J. Airborne Crystalline Silica Concentrations at Coal-Fired Power Plants Associated with Coal Fly Ash. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2006;3:448-455 https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620600802747
  5. Hwang JS. A Study on the Harmfulness of Silicon Oxide Dust and Measures for the Work Environment Improvement in Construction Sites. Journal of the Society of Disaster Information 2022;18(3):478-486
  6. IARC. Silicad Dust crystalline In the form of quartz or cristobalite. IARC Monograph 100C-14.; 2012.
  7. Kim SH, Kwon JW, Kim SM, Kim YK, Jang YH. Characteristics of domestic coals and efficient control of coal dust. Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association 2017;19(4):589-609
  8. The State of Queensland. Managing respirable dust hazards in coal-fired power stations Code of Practice(PN12377). The State of Queensland.; 2018.
  9. Yun YN, Kim YS. Particle Size Distribution and Respirable Dust Fraction of Some Coal Mine Floating Dust. Journal of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 1991;1(1):62-67
  10. Kwon JW, Jang GH, Hwang ES, Kim KW. Study on Ensuring the Reliability of Measurement and Analysis of Crystalline Silica. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency.; 2017. p. 18-31
  11. Kwon JE, Jang KM, Kim SH, Kim SD, Jang MY et al. Study on the Evaluation of Hazardous Exposures by Process and Establishment of Working Environment Management Measures in Coal-Fired Power Plants. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency.; 2020. p. 29-38
  12. Lee YG, Park JI, Lee JH, Jung TJ, Choi YE et al. Pilot Study for the Introduction of Comprehensive Work Environment Evaluation System. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency.; 2020. p. 39-55