한국학교수학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society)

  • 제26권3호
  • /
  • Pages.221-244
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1229-0890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-4350(eISSN)
한국학교수학회 (The Korean School Mathematics Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

컴퓨팅 사고력 향상을 위한 로봇 활용 수학 교수학습 자료 개발

Development of mathematics teaching and learning materials using robots to improve computational thinking

  • 투고 : 2023.08.28
  • 심사 : 2023.09.13
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 로봇을 활용하여 고등학교 함수 및 해석 영역에서 컴퓨팅 사고력을 향상할 수 있는 교수학습 자료 개발을 목표로 하였다. 문헌 연구를 통해 컴퓨팅 사고력에 대한 연구를 분석하고 국내외 수학과 교육과정 속에서 컴퓨터 프로그래밍과 코딩 교육이 어떻게 진행되고 있는지 살펴보았다. 그리고 Carnegie Mellon University DBL Unit을 재구성하여 로봇을 활용한 DBL Unit 모형을 제시하고 함수와 해석 영역의 단원을 선정하여 LEGO Mindstorms EV3를 활용한 수학 교수학습 자료를 개발하였다. 이후 델파이 조사 결과를 바탕으로 개발한 자료를 수정하고 수학 수업에서 컴퓨팅 사고력을 향상시키기 위한 시사점을 제시하였다.

This study aimed to develop teaching and learning materials that can improve computational thinking in the areas of high school functions and analysis by using robots. Through a literature review, we analyzed research on computational thinking and examined how computer programming and coding education are being conducted in domestic and international mathematics curricula. We then restructured the Carnegie Mellon University DBL Unit to propose a DBL Unit model that utilizes robots, and we developed mathematics teaching materials using LEGO Mindstorms EV3 for units in the areas of functions and analysis. Subsequently, based on the Delphi survey results, we revised the developed materials and provided recommendations for enhancing computational thinking in mathematics classes.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 제1저자의 2023년도 석사학위 일부를 재구성한 것임.

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education (2020). Mathematics curriculum (#2020-236 supplement 8). Ministry of Education.
  2. Ministry of Education (2020). Comprehensive math education plan to grow together and lead the future through the power of thinking. Ministry of Education, Press release.
  3. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum (#2022-33 supplement 8). Ministry of Education. 
  4. Kim, E. H., & Kim, R. Y. (2020). Interpretation and application of information processing competency as mathematical competency: A case of middle school mathematics textbooks under the 2015 revised curriculum. The Mathematical Education, 59(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2020.59.4.389
  5. Kim, H. K. (2006). A study on learning and teaching environments for computers and mathematics education. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 16(4), 367-386.
  6. Noh, S. Y. (2006). Delphi technique: Predict the future with professional insight. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 299, 53-62.
  7. Park, K., Lee, H., Park, S., Kang, E., Kim, S., Lim, H., Kim, S., Chang, H., Kang, T., Kwon, J., Kim, M., Pang, J., Lee, H., Lim, M., Lee, M., Kim, H., Yoon, S., Lee, K., Lee, K., ... Kang, S. (2015). 2015 revised mathematics curriculum draft development study II. Ministry of Education.
  8. Seo, D. Y., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Comparing the secondary mathematics content between France and Korea and analyzing the Baccalaureate system. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 23(2), 51-73. 
  9. Lee, S. W. (2020). An analysis of the middle school mathematics curriculum in france: Focusing on 'algorithms and programming'. School Mathematics, 22(1), 125-159.
  10. Lee, J. S. (2006). Delphi method (Research methods #21). Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  11. Rim, H., & Choi, I. (2019). Analysis of LEGO mindstorm activity levels based on the Van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 22(3), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2019.22.3.005
  12. Rim, H., Choi, I., & Noh, S. (2014). A study on the application of robotic programming to promote logical and critical thinking in mathematics education. The Mathematical Education, 53(3), 413-434. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2014.53.3.413
  13. Choen, I., Lee, H., & Cha, H. (2021). Computational thinking and problem solving. Seoul: InfinityBooks.
  14. Choi, I., Kim, H., Lee, H., & Rim, H. (2021). Analysis of 'algorithms and programming' in French high school mathematics textbooks. School Mathematics, 23(4), 617-646.
  15. Hwang, Y. H., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The recognition and needs of mathematics teachers for instruction and assessment to enhance mathematical competency. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(4), 651-669.
  16. Gueudet, G., Bueno-Ravel, L., Modeste, S., & Trouche, L. (2017). Curriculum in France: A national frame in transition. In Thompson, D., Huntley, M. A., & Suurtamm, C. (Eds.), International perspectives on mathematics curriculum (pp. 41-70). International Age Publishing. 978-1-64113-043-1. hal-01599059.
  17. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  18. Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191473
  19. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  20. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118