References
- Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revised curriculum. No. 2015-74 [Additional Book 8]. Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education (2020). A comprehensive math education plan (2020-2024). Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education (2022). 2022 Revised curriculum. No. 2022-33 [Additional Book 8]. Ministry of Education.
- Kwon, O. N., Park, J. S., & Kim, E. J. (2013) Instructions of history of mathematics with mathematical machines. The Korean Journal for History of Mathematics, 26(4), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.14477/jhm.2013.26.4.301
- Kim, S. (2000). A study on manipulative materials in mathematics education. School Mathematics, 2(2), 459-474.
- Kim, W. K. et al. (2019). Geometry. Visang.
- Park, K. M. et. al (2015). A study on the development policy of the 2015 mathematics curriculum revised draft. KOFAC.
- Boo, D. H. (2021). Improvement of the mathematical creativity using engineering tools inmathematics mentorship program. Communications of Mathematical Education, 35(1),119-136. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2021.35.1.119
- Lew, H. C. et al. (2019). Geometry. Chunjae.
- Yang, S. H. & Kang, O. K. (2011). Instruction method for quadratic curve based on dynamic visual representation by applying GeoGebra. School Mathematics, 13(3), 447-468.
- Yi, S. H. & Cho, W. Y. (2014). The perception of the professors and teachers about the education on quadratic curves in various universities. School Mathematics, 16(4), 827-845.
- Jin, M. Y., Kim. D. W., Song, M. H., & Cho. H. H. (2012). The history of conic sections and mathematics education. The Korean Journal for History of Mathematics, 25(4), 83-99.
- Choi, N. K., & Lew. H. C. (2015). A case study on utilizing invariants for mathematically gifted students by exploring algebraic curves in dynamic geometry environments. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(4), 473-498.
- Heo, N. G., (2014). Analogical reasoning in construction of quadratic curves. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 6(3), 125-133.
- Heo, N. G., (2017). A study on construction of tangent line of quadratic curves through geometric method. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(1), 51-67.
- Heo, N. G., & Lew, H. C. (2015). Development and application of action based mathematics digital textbook. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(2), 241-261.
- Antonini, S. & Martignone, F. (2011). Pantographs for geometrical transformation: An explorative study on argumentation. Consultado el 14 de abril de 2011 en.
- Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (2000). Ancient instruments in the modern classroom, In J. Fauvel & J. van Maannen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI Study (pp. 343-351). Kluwer.
- Fauvel, J. & van Maanen, J. (2000). History in mathematics education: The ICMI Study. Kluwer.
- Fennema, E. (1973). Manupulatives in the classroom. Arithmetic Teacher, 20(May), 350-352. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.20.5.0350
- Kennedy, L. M. (1986). A rationale. Arithmetic Teacher, 33(6), 6-7. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.33.6.0006
- Leung, A., Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2013). Discernment of invariants in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(3), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9492-4
- Rosin, P. L. (2001). On Serlio's constructions of ovals. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 23(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024523
- van Schooten, F. (1657). Exercitationum mathematicarum. Elsevier.
- Young, S. L. (1983). How teacher educators can use manipulative materials with preservice teachers. Arithmetic Teacher, 31, 12-13. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.31.4.0012