DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

KANO 모형 기반 안전요구사항 평가

Assessing Safety Requirements Based on KANO Model

  • 이세정 (부경대학교 안전공학과) ;
  • 장성록 (부경대학교 안전공학과) ;
  • 서용윤 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Sejung Lee (Department of Safety Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Seongrok Chang (Department of Safety Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Yongyoon Suh (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.24
  • 심사 : 2023.09.25
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30

초록

As the first step of risk management, risk identification is inevitable to understand the degree of work safety. However, the safety requirements can be divided in necessary factors and additional factors. Thus, we propose a safety requirements assessment model using Kano model derived from Herzberg's two-factor theory, classifying safety requirements into ideal elements and must-be elements. The Kano model is usually applied to evaluate customer satisfaction divided into three major requirements in the fields of product development and marketing: attractive, must-be, and one-dimensional requirements. Among them, attractive requirement and must-be requirement are matched with ideal element and must-be element for safety requirement classification, respectively. The ideal element is defined as preventive safety elements to make systems more safe and the must-be element is referred to as fatal elements to be essentially eliminated in systems. Also, coefficients of safety measurement and safety prevention are developed to classify different class of safety requirements. The positioning map is finally visualized in terms of both coefficients to compare the different features. Consequently, the proposed model enables safety managers to make a decision between safety measurement and prevention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. Kim, J. Choi, D. An(2017), "Feature extraction for bearing prognostics based on frequency energy." Journal of Korea Institute of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(2):128-139. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2017.16.2.128
  2. J. Lee, F. Wu, W. Zhao, M. Ghaffari, L. Liao, D. Siegel(2014), "Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems-reviews, methodology and applications." Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 42(1):314-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.004
  3. M. Hartono, T. K. Chuan(2011), "How the Kano Model contributes to Kansei engineering in services." Ergonomics, 54(11):987-1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.616229
  4. N. Kano, N. Seraku, F. Takahasi, S. Tsuji(1984), "Attractive quality and must be quality." Quality, 14(2):39-48.
  5. C. C. Chen, M. C. Chuang(2008), "Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design." International Journal of Production Economics, 114:667-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.015
  6. A. Shahin(2004), "Integration of FMEA and the Kano model: An exploratory examination." International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(7):731-746. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710410549082
  7. K. C. Tan, T. A. Pawitra(2001), "Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano's model into QFD for service excellence development." Managing Service Quality, 11(6):418-430. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006520
  8. A. Shahin, S. M. Shahiverdi(2015), "Estimating customer lifetime value for new product development based on the Kano model with a case study in automobile industry." Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(5):857-873. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2013-0099