DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Assessment for College Students' Usage Patterns and Usability Testing of E-book Subscription Services

대학생의 전자책 구독 서비스 이용 실태 및 사용성 평가

  • 신혜원 (숙명여자대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 신동희 (숙명여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.08.23
  • Accepted : 2023.09.12
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the perception of e-book subscription services among the digitally native generation in their twenties, who have a high e-book usage rate. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining survey responses and usability testing. It aimed to assess the awareness and usage of e-book subscription services among university students in their twenties, a demographic known for their high utilization of electronic devices and e-books. The survey was conducted among 202 university students, and the responses were categorized and examined based on whether they were users or non-users. As a result of the survey, I found there is different awareness of e-book between users and non-users, on the other hand, convenience and portability are the strong point of e-books for users and non-users commonly also. Usability testing was performed on a group of 10 university students in their twenties who had not previously used the 'Millies Library' application, which is renowned as the most widely-used e-book platform. Following the experiment, participants expressed positive feedback regarding various optional features, convenience, design, and cost-effectiveness. However, they also had negative reactions concerning touch errors, malfunctions, functional practicality, a lack of interest, system issues, and the absence of a library.

본 연구는 전자책 이용률이 높은 디지털 네이티브 세대인 20대를 대상으로 전자책 구독서비스에 대한 인식을 파악하고자 하였다. 설문조사와 사용성 평가(usability testing)를 병행한 혼합연구 방법을 통해 전자책 이용률이 높은 20대 대학생의 전자책 구독 서비스이용 실태 및 서비스에 대한 인식을 조사하였다. 설문조사를 통해 국내 대학생 202명의 의견을 수집하였고, 전자책 비이용자와 이용자를 구분하여 분석하였다. 설문 결과, 비이용자와 이용자 간의 전자책에 인식의 차이가 나타났으며, 휴대성 및 편의성은 두 연구 참여자 그룹에게 공통적으로 나타나는 전자책의 장점으로 조사되었다. 사용성 평가에서 사용된 '밀리의 서재' 애플리케이션은 가장 대중적인 전자책 플랫폼으로 해당 서비스를 활용하여 전자책 이용 경험이 없는 20대 대학생 10명을 대상으로 평가가 진행되었다. 실험 결과, 연구 참여자들은 전자책의 편의성, 디자인, 다양한 부가 기능, 가성비 등에 대해 긍정적인 반응을 보인 반면, 흥미 부족, 기능 실용성, 터치 오류 및 오작동, 장서 부족, 시스템 문제에 대해서는 부정적인 의견을 나타냈다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung, Dahee (2020). A correlation analysis of e-book subscription plans. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 21(10), 1791-1800. http://dx.doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.10.1791 
  2. Jang, Seon-Hwa & Han, Sang-Wan (2004). A study on usability evaluation factors for e-book user interface. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.3.269 
  3. Je, Su Yeon (2001). Research on the Current Status and Development of eBook, Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University. 
  4. Jeong, Jae-Yeol & Shin, Dong-Hee (2014). Book readers shopping orientation between printed book and e-book. Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 1135-1137. 
  5. Jung, Mi Ri & Kim, Boyeon (2013). Analysis about paper-books and electronic-books based on the human behavior: through case analysis of ibooks application through 7 step user activity model. Journal of Digital Design, 13(1), 671-680. https://doi.org/10.17280/JDD.2013.13.1.064 
  6. Jung, YongChan & Kim, YoonHwa (2023). The 2022 Survey of Broadcast Media Usage Behavior n Korea. 
  7. Kim, Hyunjeong (2012). Comparative analysis on usability of e-book reader interface. Journal of Digital Design, 12(1), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.17280/JDD.2012.12.1.051 
  8. Kim, JungHyun, Yang, Dayeon, & Park, Sunyoung (2021). An exploratory study on usability of welfare information platform: usability evaluation of local government welfare information platforms. Journal of Korean Social Welfare Administration, 23(4), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.22944/kswa.2021.23.4.004 
  9. Kim, Mina & Park, Seolwoo (2023). The difference between subscription economy types and product types on subscription intention. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 28(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.17657/jcr.2023.1.31.4 
  10. Kim, Sun-Young & Oh, Kyung-Soo (2015). Influence of mobile bookstore application service quality on user satisfaction and reuse intention. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 15(10), 535-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.10.535 
  11. Kim, Tae-Yeon & Yi, Soon-Hyung (2014). The differences in children's story comprehension according to the types of reading media paperback books vs. electronic books. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 35(4), 249-262. http://dx.org/10.5723/KJCS.2014.35.4.249 
  12. Korea Education and Research Information Service (2021). University Library Statistics Survey and Trends over the Last 10 Years. 
  13. Kwak, Seung-Jin & Bae, Kyung-Jae (2011). An experimental study on the usability test for the e-book reader. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3), 313-333. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.313 
  14. Lee, Yong-Jun (2010). Research of audience perception on korea e-book market. Studies of Korean Science, 36(2), 213-250. 
  15. Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism (2013). The 2012 Survey of E-book Reading Behavior in Korea. 
  16. Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism (2021). The 2021 Survey of Literature in Korea.
  17. Nam, Young-Joon & Choi, Sung-Eun (2011). A study on user satisfaction with e-book services in university libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(1), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.1.287 
  18. Park, Hyun-Gil (2019). Subscription economy. Marketing, 53(7), 32-44. 
  19. Park, Su-Jin (2007). A Study on the Preference Media Based on Media Types between Paper-books and Electronic-books, Master's thesis, Sungkyunkwan University. 
  20. Seong, Tae-Je & Si, Ki-Ja (2006). Research Methodology. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  21. Yi, Se-young (2010). The e-publishing industry: current status and outlook. Korea Creative Content Agency, 10-02. 
  22. Yoon, Sungwook, Kim, Heesun, & Kim, Hyenki (2013). A study on the usability evaluation of e-book interface. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(4), 137-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.04.137
  23. Gardiner, E. & Musto, R. G. (2010). The Electronic Book, The Oxford Companion to the Book, 164, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
  24. Lunneborg, C. E. (2007). Convenience sample. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2007(2), 788-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc131 
  25. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering. Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.
  26. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816