The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis

  • Received : 2023.07.03
  • Accepted : 2023.08.24
  • Published : 2023.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Genicular nerve neurolysis with phenol and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are two interventional techniques for treating chronic refractory knee osteoarthritis (KOA) pain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of both techniques. Methods: Sixty-four patients responding to diagnostic blockade of the superior medial, superior lateral, and inferior medial genicular nerve under ultrasound guidance were randomly divided into two groups: Group P (2 mL phenol for each genicular nerve) and Group R (RFA 80℃ for 60 seconds for each genicular nerve). The numeric rating scale (NRS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. Results: RFA and phenol neurolysis of the genicular nerves provided effective analgesia within groups at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months compared to baseline. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of NRS and WOMAC scores at all measurement times. At the 3rd month follow-up, 50% or more pain relief was observed in 53.1% of patients in Group P and 50% of patients in Group R. The rate of transient paresthesia was 34.4% in Group P and 6.3% in Group R, and this was significantly higher in Group P. Conclusions: Neurolysis of the genicular nerves with both RFA and phenol is effective in the management of KOA pain. Phenol may be a good alternative to RFA. Further studies are needed on issues such as dose adjustment to prevent transient paresthesia response.

Keywords

References

  1. Neogi T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21: 1145-53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018
  2. Haider MZ, Bhuiyan R, Ahmed S, Zahid-Al-Quadir A, Choudhury MR, Haq SA, et al. Risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in Bangladeshi adults: a national survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23: 333. 
  3. Risso RC, Ferraro LHC, Nouer Frederico T, Peng PWH, Luzo MV, Debieux P, et al. Chemical ablation of genicular nerve with phenol for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Pain Pract 2021; 21: 438-44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12972
  4. Conger A, Gililland J, Anderson L, Pelt CE, Peters C, McCormick ZL. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of painful knee osteoarthritis: current evidence and future directions. Pain Med 2021; 22(Suppl 1): S20-3.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab129
  5. Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, et al. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain 2011; 152: 481-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029
  6. Guven Kose S, Kirac Unal Z, Kose HC, Celikel F, Akkaya OT. Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve radiofrequency treatment: prospective randomized comparative trial of a 3-nerve protocol versus a 5-nerve protocol. Pain Med 2023; 24: 758-67. 
  7. Salehi R, Valizadeh L, Negahban H, Karimi M, Goharpey S, Shahali S. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis, Lequesne Algofunctional index, Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale-short form, and Visual Analogue Scale in patients with knee osteoarthritis: responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45: 2185-91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2084776
  8. Sari S, Aydin ON, Turan Y, Ozlulerden P, Efe U, Kurt Omurlu I. Which one is more effective for the clinical treatment of chronic pain in knee osteoarthritis: radiofrequency neurotomy of the genicular nerves or intra-articular injection? Int J Rheum Dis 2018; 21: 1772-8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12925
  9. Fogarty AE, Burnham T, Kuo K, Tate Q, Sperry BP, Cheney C, et al. The effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 101: 482-92.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001813
  10. Cosman ER Jr, Dolensky JR, Hoffman RA. Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size. Pain Med 2014; 15: 2020-36.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12566
  11. Cushman DM, Monson N, Conger A, Kendall RW, Henrie AM, McCormick ZL. Use of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL of local anesthetic for genicular nerve blocks. Pain Med 2019; 20: 1049-52.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny277
  12. Gonzalez Sotelo V, Macule F, Minguell J, Berge R, Franco C, Sala-Blanch X. Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block for pain control after total knee replacement: preliminary case series and technical note. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2017; 64: 568-76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2017.04.001
  13. Walega DR, McCormick ZL. Chemical neurolysis of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: reviving an old dog and an old trick. Pain Med 2018; 19: 1882-4.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny023
  14. Kidd VD, Strum SR, Strum DS, Shah J. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for painful knee arthritis: the why and the how. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2019; 9: e10. 
  15. D'Souza RS, Warner NS. Phenol nerve block. Stat-Pearls Publishing. 2023. 
  16. Dass RM, Kim E, Kim HK, Lee JY, Lee HJ, Rhee SJ. Alcohol neurolysis of genicular nerve for chronic knee pain. Korean J Pain 2019; 32: 223-7.  https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2019.32.3.223
  17. Tan YL, Neo EJR, Wee TC. Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blockade with pharmacological agents for chronic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Pain Physician 2022; 25: E489-502. 
  18. Tran J, Peng PWH, Lam K, Baig E, Agur AMR, Gofeld M. Anatomical study of the innervation of anterior knee joint capsule: implication for image-guided intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43: 407-14.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000778
  19. Kose SG, Kose HC, Celikel F, Akkaya OT. Predictive factors associated with successful response to utrasound guided genicular radiofrequency ablation. Korean J Pain 2022; 35: 447-57.  https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.4.447
  20. Tran J, Peng P, Agur A. Evaluation of nerve capture using classical landmarks for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation: 3D cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45: 898-906.  https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101894
  21. Kim DH, Lee MS, Lee S, Yoon SH, Shin JW, Choi SS. A prospective randomized comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound- vs fluoroscopy-guided genicular nerve block for chronic knee osteoarthritis. Pain Physician 2019; 22: 139-46.  https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj/2019.22.139
  22. Sari S, Aydin ON, Turan Y, Sen S, Ozlulerden P, Omurlu IK, et al. Which imaging method should be used for genicular nerve radio frequency thermocoagulation in chronic knee osteoarthritis? J Clin Monit Comput 2017; 31: 797-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9886-9