분석과 대안 (Analyses & Alternatives)

  • 제7권2호
  • /
  • Pages.35-77
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2508-822X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508 - 8238(eISSN)
사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원 (Korea Consensus Institute(KCI))
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Compressed Demographic Transition and Economic Growth in the Latecomer

  • 투고 : 2023.05.21
  • 심사 : 2023.06.02
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study aims to solve the entangled loop between demographic transition (DT) and economic growth by analyzing cross-country data. We undertake a national-level group analysis to verify the compressed transition of demographic variables over time. Assuming that the LA (latecomer advantage) on DT over time exists, we verify that the DT of the latecomer is compressed by providing a formal proof of LA on DT over income. As a DT has the double-kinked functions of income, we check them in multiple aspects: early maturation, leftward threshold, and steeper descent under a contour map and econometric methods. We find that the developing countries (the latecomer) have speedy DT (CDT, compressed DT) as well as speedy income such that DT of the latecomers starts at lower levels of income, lasts for a shorter period, and finishes at the earlier stage of economic development compared to that of developed countries (the early mover). To check the balance of DT, we classify countries into four groups of DT---balanced, slow, unilateral, and rapid transition countries. We identify that the main causes of rapid transition are due to the strong family planning programs of the government. Finally, we check the effect of latecomer's CDT on economic growth inversely: we undertake the simulation of the CDT effect on economic growth and the aging process for the latecomer. A worrying result is that the CDT of the latecomer shows a sharp upturn of the working-age population, followed by a sharp downturn in a short period. Compared to early-mover countries, the latecomer countries cannot buy more time to accommodate the workable population for the period of demographic bonus and prepare their aging societies for demographic onus. Thus, we conclude that CDT is not necessarily advantageous to developing countries. These outcomes of the latecomer's CDT can be re-interpreted as follows. Developing countries need power sources to pump up economic development, such as the following production factors: labor, physical and financial capital, and economic systems. As for labor, the properties of early maturation and leftward thresholds on DTs of the latecomer mean that demographic movement occurs at an unusually early stage of economic development; this is similar to a plane that leaks fuel before or just before take-off, with the result that it no longer flies higher or farther. What is worse, the property of steeper descent represents the falling speed of a plane so that it cannot be sustained at higher levels, and then plummets to all-time lows.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahmad, N., Peng, T. N., Zaman, K. F., Sapri, N. A., Manaf, M., & Kim, Y. Y. (2010). Status of Family Planning in Malaysia. In UNFPA-ICOMP Regional Consultation, Draft version.
  2. Barro, R. J., & Becker, G. S. (1989). Fertility Choice in a Model of Economic Growth. Econometrica 57 (2): 481-501.
  3. Becker, G. S. (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. New York: Columbia University Press, 209-240.
  4. Becker, G. S., & Barro, R. J. (1988). A Reformulation of the Economic Theory of Fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 103 (1): 1-25.
  5. Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. (1990). Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5-2): S12-S37.
  6. Benhabib, J., & Nishimura, K. (1989). Endogenous Fluctuations in the Barro-Becker Theory of Fertility. In Demographic Change and Economic Development, edited by Alois Wening and Klaus Zimmermann, 29-41. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  7. Bloom, D., & Williamson, J. G. (1998). Demographic Transitions and Economic Miracles in Emerging Asia. World Bank Economic Review 12 (3): 419-455.
  8. Bloom, D., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change, Population Matters, Santa Monica CA: Rand.
  9. Brown, G. F. (2007). Morocco: First Steps in Family Planning. In The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs, edited by Warren C. Robinson, and John A. Ross, Washington, D.C., The World Bank.
  10. Chakraborty, S. (2004). Endogenous Lifetime and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Theory 116 (1): 119-137.
  11. Chakraborty, S., Papageorgiou, C. & Perez-Sebastian, F. (2010). Diseases, Infection Dynamics, and Development. Journal of Monetary Economics 57 (7): 859-872.
  12. Cho, D., Kim, D., & Rhee, D. (1998). Latecomer Strategies: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea. Organization Science 9 (4): 489-505.
  13. Cutler, D. M., Deaton, A. S., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2006). The Determinants of Mortality. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (3): 97-120.
  14. Dahan, M., & Tsiddon, D. (1998). Demographic Transition, Income Distribution, and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3 (1): 29-52.
  15. Doepke, M. (2005). Child Mortality and Fertility Decline: Does the Barro-Becker Model Fit the Facts? Journal of Population Economics 18 (2): 337-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0208-z
  16. Easterlin, R. A. (1966). On the Relation of Economic Factors to Recent and Projected Fertility Changes. Demography 3 (1): 131-153.
  17. Fernandez-Villaverde, J. (2001). Was Malthus Right? Economic Growth and Population Dynamics. Unpublished.
  18. Frazer, E. (1992). Thailand: A Family Planning Success Story. In Context 31: 44.
  19. Galor, O. (2011). Unified Growth Theory. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  20. Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (1996). The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth. American Economic Review 86 (3): 374-387.
  21. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  22. Han, Hongyul. (2022). Structural Change as a Source of Growth: An Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries. Analyses & Alternatives 6(1): 195-222.
  23. Haub, C. (2010). Did South Korea's Population Policy Work Too Well. Population Reference Bureau, March. http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2010/koreafertility.aspx.
  24. Joo, Sangyong & Hyun, Jun Seog. (2020). The Effect of Demographic Changes on the Growth Potential of Korea. Analyses & Alternatives 4(2): 71-102.
  25. Keyfitz, N. (1989). The Growing Human Population. Scientific American 261 (3): 118-126.
  26. Shin, Inyong & Kim, Hyunho. (2020). The Relation between the Demographic Transition and GDP per capita at the National-level Data, Korea Journal of Regional Economics 45: 5-20.
  27. Kirk, D. (1996). Demographic Transition Theory. Population Studies 50 (3): 361-387.
  28. Kremer, M. (1993). Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 681-716. 
  29. Lapan, H. E., & Enders, W. (1990). Endogenous Fertility, Ricardian Equivalence, and Debt Management Policy. Journal of Public Economics 41 (2): 227-248.
  30. Lee, Dong Jin. (2023). Asymmetric Changes in Korean Industry and Labor After Economic Crises. Analyses & Alternatives 7(1): 45-81.
  31. Maddison, A. (2001). The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
  32. Mizushima, A. (2009). Intergenerational Transfers of Time and Public Long-term Care with an Aging Population. Journal of Macroeconomics 31 (4): 572-581 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2008.12.009
  33. Momota, A., Ken, T., & Futagami, K. (2005). Infectious Disease and Preventive Behavior in an Overlapping Generations Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29 (10): 1673-1700.
  34. Murphy, T. E. (2015). Old Habits Die Hard (Sometimes): Can Department Heterogeneity Tell Us Something about the French Fertility Decline? Journal of Economic Growth 20: 177-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9111-6
  35. Nerlove, M., Razin, A., & Sadka, E. (1978). Household and Economy: Welfare Economics of Endogenous Fertility. New York: Academic Press.
  36. New York Times. (2015). China Ends One-Child Policy, Allowing Families Two Children. Oct. 29. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/world/asia/china-endone-child-policy.html.
  37. Omran, Abdel R. 1971, "The Epidemiologic Transition." In International Encyclopedia of Population, edited by John A. Ross, Vol. 1, Free Press.
  38. Ozawa, T. (2004). Veblen's Theories of ''Latecomer Advantage" and "The Machine Process": Relevancy for Flexible Production. Journal of Economic Issues 38 (2): 379-388.
  39. Pecchenino, R. A., & Pollard, P. S. (1997). The Effects of Annuities, Bequests, and Aging in an Overlapping Generations Model of Endogenous Growth. Economic Journal 107 (440): 26-46.
  40. Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2005). The International Diffusion of New Technologies: A Multi-technology Analysis of Latecomer Advantage and Global Economic Integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (4): 789-808.
  41. Qi, L., & Kanaya, S. (2010). The Concavity of the Value Function of the Extended Barro-Becker Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34 (3): 314-329. 
  42. Roudi-Fahimi, F. (2004). Islam and Family Planning. MENA Policy Brief, Population Reference Bureau.
  43. Sadik, N. (1991). Population Policies and Programs: Lessons Learned from Two Decades of Experience, United Nations Population Fund, New York: NYU Press.
  44. Sen, A. (1998). Mortality as an Indicator of Economic Success and Failure. Economic Journal 108 (446): 1-25.
  45. Tabata, K. (2005). Population Aging, the Costs of Health Care for the Elderly and Growth, Journal of Macroeconomics 27 (3): 472-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2004.02.008
  46. Tekce, B. (1985), Determinants of Child Survival: Comments on a New perspective. In Population Factors in Development Planning in the Middle East, edited by Fredric C. Shorter and Huda Zurayk, New York, Population Council: 137-147.
  47. Thomson, W. S. (1929). Population. American Journal of Sociology 34 (6): 959-975.
  48. Todato, Michael P. & Stephen C. Smith. (2009). Economic Development, Boston MA: Addison Wesley.
  49. United Nations (2006). World Population Policies 2005, United Nations publication, Sales No. E.06.XIII.5, New York.
  50. United Nations (2011). World Contraceptive Use 2011, Chart, Department of Social and Economic Affairs, UN Population Divisions.
  51. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2008), World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Equatorial Guinea: Overview, Minority Rights Group International.
  52. University of Pennsylvania. 1960-2010. Penn World Tables 6.3, Gross Domestic Product per capita. http://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/php\_site/pwt63/pwt63\_form.php (accessed February 10, 2014).
  53. USAID. 2006. Romania: Scaling Up Integrated Family Planning Services: A Case Study, Delivery Project. Washington D.C.
  54. Vallin, J. (1991). Mortality in Europe from 1720 to 1914: Long-term Trends and Changes in the Patterns by Age and Sex. In The Decline of Mortality in Europe, edited by Roger Schofield, David Reher, and Alain Bideau, Oxford, Oxford University Press: 38-67.
  55. Van den Berg, H. (2012). Economic Growth and Development, 2nd edition, Singapore: World Scientific. 
  56. Weber, L. (2010). Demographic Change and Economic Growth: Simulations on Growth Models, London, UK: Physica-Verlag.
  57. Weil, D. N. (2013). Economic Growth, Pearson, Boston MA: Addison Wesley.
  58. Wikipedians. (2011). Economics, Mainz Germany: Pedia Press.
  59. Wong, Poh-Kam. (1999). National Innovation Systems for Rapid Technological Catch-up: An Analytical Framework and a Comparative Analysis of Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference on National Innovation Systems, Industrial Dynamics and Innovation Policy, Rebild: Denmark.
  60. World Bank. (2011). Mauritania - Reproductive Health at a Glance. MENA Policy Brief, Population Reference Bureau. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/05/14659199/mauritania-reproductive-health-glance.
  61. World Bank. 1960-2010. ''World Development Indicators 2010, Birth Rate, Crude." http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CBRT.IN (accessed February 10, 2014).
  62. World Bank. 1960-2010. ''World Development Indicators 2010, Death Rate, Crude." http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CDRT.IN (accessed February 10, 2014).