벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제18권4호
  • /
  • Pages.149-163
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

혁신클러스터 활성화 요인이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 대덕연구개발특구 중소기업을 중심으로

Impact of Innovation Cluster Activating Factors on Business Performance: Focusing on the SMEs Case of Daedeok Innopolis

  • 박후근 (연구개발특구진흥재단) ;
  • 배관표 (충남대학교 국가정책대학원)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.12
  • 심사 : 2023.08.28
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

혁신클러스터 정책은 특정 지역에 산업부문과 연구부문의 연계를 강화하여 산업의 경쟁력을 확보하는 것을 목적으로 한다. OECD(1997)에서 첨단 중소기업을 중심으로 산업 재구조화를 통해 지역발전을 유도하는 혁신클러스터 개념이 제시된 후 산업과 지역, 과학기술 분야에서 혁신클러스터 개념을 적용하여 적극적으로 정책을 추진하기 시작했다. 혁신클러스터 활성화 차원에서 그간의 정책 및 연구에서는 구성원 간 교류·협력에 집중하는 경향이 뚜렷했으나, 본 연구에서는 혁신클러스터를 육성하고자 하는 근본적인 이유인 산업 및 지역의 경쟁력 강화, 즉 기업의 경쟁력 강화에 집중하여 연구를 진행하였다. 이에 따라, 본 연구는 혁신클러스터 활성화 요인이 대덕연구개발구에 입주한 중소기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 것을 목적으로 진행하였다. 이를 위해 혁신클러스터가 가지는 본질적인 개념인 산업집적 요인, 네트워킹 요인, 혁신창출 요인 등 혁신클러스터 활성화 요인 도출 후 175개 기업의 설문조사 결과를 활용하여 가설을 검증하였다. 혁신클러스터 활성화 요인 중 산업집적 요인과 혁신창출 요인은 기업의 경영성과에 긍정적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 네트워킹 요인은 기업의 경영성과에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 이전에 수행된 사례 중심의 연구들과 달리 실증분석을 통해 혁신클러스터의 활성화 요인을 다루었다는 점에서 차별성을 가진다. 또한, 혁신클러스터에서 네트워킹 요인에 대한 직관적 판단과 실제 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향 간 차이를 고려하여, 보다 효과적인 혁신클러스터 정책을 위해서는 지역에 뿌리내려진 사회적·문화적 구조, 특화 산업의 특성, 구성원의 니즈 등 다각적인 관점에서 혁신클러스터에 대한 입체적 검토의 필요성을 제기했다는 측면에서 실무적인 의의도 존재한다.

The policy of promoting innovation clusters aims to enhance the competitiveness of industries by strengthening the linkages between industry sectors and research sectors in specific regions. In Korea, after the concept of innovation clusters was introduced by the OECD in 1997, Korean government actively pursued policies based on this concept in the fields of industry, region, and science and technology. Previous policies and research on the activation of innovation clusters have tended to focus on the exchange and collaboration among members. However, this study focused on enhancing the competitiveness of industries and regions, in other words, strengthening the competitiveness of companies, which is the fundamental reason for fostering innovative clusters. Accordingly, this study aimed to analyze the impact of factors activating innovation clusters on the business performance of SMEs located in the Daedeok Innopolis. To achieve this, based on the essential concept of innovation clusters such as industrial agglomeration factors, networking factors, innovation generation factors, the study derived factors for activating innovation clusters and verified hypotheses using the survey results of 175 companies. Among the factors activating innovation clusters, industrial agglomeration and innovation generation were found to have a positive impact on the business performance of companies. However, networking factors were analyzed to have no significant influence on the business performance of companies. This study differentiates itself by addressing the factors for activating innovation clusters through empirical analysis, unlike previous case-based studies. Furthermore, considering the difference between intuitive judgments on networking factors in innovation clusters and their actual impact on business performance, the study raised the practical significance of conducting a comprehensive examination from various perspectives, such as the socially and culturally embedded structures in the region, the characteristics of specialized industries, and the needs of cluster members, to develop more effective policies for innovation clusters.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Asheim, B., Cooke, P., & Martin, R.(2006). The rise of the cluster concept in regional analysis and policy. Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations, 1-29.
  2. Bae, J. T., & Jung, J. W.(1997), Relationship Between Technological Cooperation Activities and Performance of Small and Medium size Companies in Korea. Journal of the Society of Small and Medium Business, 19(2), 273-296.
  3. Boekholt, P., & Thuriaux, B.(1999). Public Policies to Facilitate Clusters: Background, Rationale and Policy Practices in International Perspective, in Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. Paris: OECD.
  4. Bok, D. K.(2003). Network Structure of Successful Industrial Cluster: Case of Silicon Valley and Toyota City. Journal of Regional Studies, 11(1), 63-83.
  5. Bok, D. K., & Park, Y. K.(2007). The Effects of Network Structure on the Individual Firm's R&D Expenditure: Empirical Evidence on Korean Data. Journal of the Korean Academic Society of Industrial Cluster, 1(1), 16-28.
  6. Brown, J. S.(2000). The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  7. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E.(2005). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Third ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Capello, R.(1999). Spatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieux: learning versus collective learning processes. Regional Studies, 33(4), 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950081211
  9. Cho, E. S.(2014). A Study on the Multidimensional Policy Monitoring of Innovative Cluster Policy in Korea: Focusing on the Korea Industrial Cluster Program. Korean policy sciences review, 18(4), 55-84.
  10. Choi, I. Y., & Han, J. H.(2014). A Study of the Criticality and The Priority for Developing Crea tive Cluster of The National Industrial Complex: For the Gumi National Industr ial Complex. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 17(1), 195-218.
  11. Choi, J. I.(2008). Critical Success Factors of Innovation Cluster: Focus on the Daedeok Innopolis. Journal of Innovation Cluster, 1(1), 67-90.
  12. Chung, D. B., Ko, Y. M., & Kim, K. N.(2012). An Analysis of Industry-University-Institute R&D Collaboration and Firm Performance on SMEs. Journal of Technology Innovation, 20(1), 115-140.
  13. Chung, S. Y., Hwang, D. H., & Yim, J. B.(2016). A study on the impact factors for innovation cluster: A case of the Pangyo Techno Valley. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 19(4), 848-872.
  14. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A.(1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  15. Cooke, P.(2001). Regional Innovation System, Cluster, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and corporate Change, 10(4), 945-974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945
  16. Cooke, P.(2008). Regional Innovation System, Clean Technology and Jacobian Cluster Platform Policies. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 1(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00002.x
  17. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G.(1997). Regional Innovation System: International and Organizational Dimension. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 23-45.
  18. Etzkowitz, H.(2012). Triple helix clusters: boundary permeability at university-industry-government interfaces as a regional innovation strategy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(5), 766-779. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1182
  19. Han, W. Y., Nam, J. H., & Shin, K, J.(2010). In-depth Evaluation Report on Innovation Cluster Projects in Industrial Complex. Eumseong: KISTEP.
  20. Herliana, S.(2015). Regional innovation cluster for small and medium enterprise: A triple helix concept. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.297
  21. Heunks, F. J.(1998). Innovation, Creativity and Success. Small Business Economic, 10(3), 263-272.
  22. Hyundai Research Institute.(2004). Trends in Innovation Capacity by Region and Cluster Strategies. Seoul: Ministry of Knowledge Economy.
  23. Hong, H. D.(2003). University-Industry Link Strategy for Promoting the Cooperation: With the Role Model of Polytechnic University. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, 15(1), 1-24.
  24. Hong, H. D.(2006). Policy Linkage and Expansion of Innovation Cluster Projects in Industrial Complex. Gwacheon: Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy.
  25. Im, J. B.(2013). The study on the effect of innovation cluster on firm's businessa ctivities: focusing on the innovation cluster in Gyeonggi-Province. Doctoral Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  26. Im, J. B., Cho, H. R., & Chung, S. Y.(2012). The study on the policy for the formation of the innovation cluster: Focus on Pangyo Techno valley in Gyeonggi Province. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 15(3), 675-699.
  27. Inter ministerial council.(2023). Development of a global cluster for advanced industries: Focusing on Bio-Cluster. Sejong: Inter ministerial council.
  28. Jang, J. S., Yim, D. S., Kim, Y. D., Bok, D. K., & Park, J. K.(2007). Innovation Cluster. Seoul: National Balanced Development Committee.
  29. Jeong, I. H.(2009). Determinants of network outcome and performances in innovation clusters. Doctoral Dissertation, Yeungnam University.
  30. Jeong, J. S., Park, D., Lee, D. S., Park, J. S., & Park, C. W.(2006). Activating Measures of HRD toward the Industry-Academia Clusters. Seoul: Foundation of Korea Vocational Education and Training Institute.
  31. Jun, I., & Oh, S. H.(2016). The Relationship of Top Management Team's Willingness to Innovate and Technological Innovation Capability: Focusing on the Mediating role of R&D Intensity and the Moderating Role of Innovative Organizational Culture. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 29(2), 213-235.
  32. Kim, H. J., & Huh, J.(2010). Statistical Analysis and Explanation of Korean SPSSWIN 18.0. Seoul: Samyoungsa.
  33. Kim, J. H.(2010). Empirical analysis on the economies of agglomeration for the local industrial cluster projects in korea. The Korea Local Administration Review, 24(2), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.22783/KRILA.2010.24.2.157
  34. Kim, K. S.(2005). Comparative and Empirical Analysis between Regional Innovation Capabilities and Regional Industrial Performances for Regional Innovation Cluster. Journal of Korea Trade, 30(6), 27-45.
  35. Kim, S. B., Jung, J. H., & Lee, J. M.(2005). Linkage Structures and Spatial Patterns of Industrial Clusters in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade.
  36. Kim, S. H.(2007). Building the Innovation Network Strategy for the Open Technology Innovation by Major Industry. Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  37. Kwon, J. J., Kim, Y. S., & Hwang, H. Y.(2009). Analysis of Industrial Clustering Effect on Building Innovation City: A Case of Developing the Chungbuk Innovation City. Journal of the National Geographic Society, 43(4), 557-569.
  38. Korea Industrial Technology Association(2013). A Survey to Expand Cooperation between Enterprises and Government Funded Research Institute. Seoul: Korea Industrial Technology Association.
  39. Korea Innovation Foundation(2022). Report on Statistical Survey of Innopolis. Daejeon: Korea Innovation Foundation.
  40. Kwon, O. H.(2017). Concept and Range of Industrial Cluster. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 52(1), 55-71.
  41. Laursen, K., & Salter, A.(2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  42. Lee, C. W.(2007). The Evaluation of Regional Innovation and Innovative Cluster Policies in Korea. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 10(4), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2007.10.4.377
  43. Lee, E. H., & Oh, D. S.(2016). Endogenous Development Strategy of Technopolis in Korea: Case of Daedeok INNOPOLIS. World Technopolis Report, 5, 2-18. https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2016.5.1.2
  44. Lee, J. D.(2014). The Effects of SMEs' Core Competence and Competitive Strategy on their Business Performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  45. Lee, J. H., & Lee, C. W.(2003). Social and Institutional Conditions for the Development of the Innovation Cluster. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 11(2), 195-217.
  46. Lee, J. Y., Chai, W. H., Lee, C. W., & Son, H. J.(2005). Strategies for Developing Innovation Cluster in Korea: Focusing on Industrial Cluster. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 15(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.23036/KAPAE.2005.15.2.006
  47. Lee, S. Y.(2011). The Study of Industrial Clusters in the Busan, Ulsan, Koungnam as Southeast Area of Korea Analysed by the Location Quotient(LQ) Analysis Method. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 14(3), 599-621.
  48. Lee, W. I., Yim, D. S., Lee, Y. H., & Jung, E. J.(2010). The Study on the Strategy for the Formation of the Innovation Clusters: Focused on the Scenario Planning of the 'Pankyo Techno Valley'. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 14(2), 301-319.
  49. Lin, H., Zeng, S., Liu, H., & Li, C.(2016). How do Intermediaries Drive Corporate Innovation? A Moderated Mediating Examination. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4831-4836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.039
  50. Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., & Hua, Z.(2013). The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452-1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016
  51. Lundvall, B. A.(1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Printer Publishers.
  52. Marshall, A.(1920). Principles of Economics(8th edn.). London: Macmillan. 
  53. Martin, R., & Sunley, P.(2003). Deconstructing clusters; chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5
  54. McCann, P.(2001). Urban and Regional Economics. London: Oxford University Press.
  55. Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F.(2003). Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
  56. Nam, G. B.(2004). The Paradox of Cluster Policy: Lessons from the Worst Practices. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 7(3), 407-432.
  57. Newlands, D.(2003). Competition and cooperation industrial clusters: the implications for public policy. European Planning Studies, 11(5), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310303649
  58. OECD.(1992). Technology and Economy: the Key Relationships. Paris: OECD.
  59. OECD.(1997). National Innovation System. Paris: OECD.
  60. OECD.(1999). Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. Paris: OECD.
  61. Onias, P., & Malecki, E. J.(1999). Spatial Innovation System. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  62. Paniccia, I.(2002). Industrial Districts: Evolution and Competitiveness in Italian Firms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  63. Park, H. G., & Bae, K. P.(2021). Analysis on the Difference in Perception Between Policy Providers and Users on the Factors that Activate the Innovation Cluster: Focusing on the Case of Daedeok Innopolis using AHP. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 16(3), 105-119.
  64. Park, J. S., Park, S. H., & Hong, S. S.(2020). Integrated Study on the Factors Influencing Sustainable Innovation Cluster of Pangyo Techno Valley. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.15.1.202002.71
  65. Park, S. C., & Moon, M, C.(2010). A study on the establishment of an innovation cluster network: the performance and problems of mini-cluster activities in the industrial complex and the activation methodology. The korean association for public administration winter conference, 2010(0), 1-18.
  66. Park, W. K.(2021). Expectations for the re-creation of the Daedeok Innopolis. Daejeon Ilbo, http://www.daejonilbo.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=1484442.
  67. Paytas, J., Gradeck, R., & Andrews, L.(2004). Universities and the Development of Industry Clusters. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon Heniz Business School.
  68. Porter, M.(1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
  69. Porter, M.(1998). Cluster and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, November-December, 77-90.
  70. Roh, K. H., & Kim, Y. S.(2004). Industrial Policies for Building the Regional Innovation System of Chungbuk. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 7(1), 130-158.
  71. Schmitz, H.(1999). Collective efficiency and increasing returns. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 435-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.4.465
  72. Shin, S. W.(2019). The impact of technological innovation capacity on business performance: Focusing on the moderating effect of technical commercialization capacity. Management & Information Systems Review, 38(1), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2019.38.1.013
  73. Shou, Z., Chen, J., Zhu, W., & Yang, L.(2014). Firm Capability and Performance in China: The Moderating Role of Guanxi and Institutional Forces in Domestic and Foreign Contexts. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.11.014
  74. Spencer, G. M., Vinodrai, T., Gertler, M. S., & Wolfe, D. A.(2010). Do Clusters Make a Difference? Defining and Assessing their Economic Performance. Regional Studies, 44(6), 697-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903107736
  75. Storper, M., & Scott, A. J.(1988). The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In WOLCH J. and DEAR M. (Eds), London: The Power of Geography, Allen & Unwin.
  76. Yam, R. C. M., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F., & Tang, E. P. Y. (2004). An Audit of technological innovation capabilities in chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, china. Research Policy, 31(3), 543-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  77. Yang, D. W., & Kim, D. J.(2010). Causal Relationship between Firms' R&D Collaboration and Performance in Contents Industry. International Journal of Contents, 306-317.