Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Landscape Conservation Direct Payment System Based on Spatial Information Data and Utilization of Rural Area Regeneration

공간정보데이터 기반의 경관보전직불제도 실태분석과 농촌공간 재생의 활용방안

  • 김용진 (한국섬진흥원) ;
  • 강동진 (서울대학교 환경계획연구소) ;
  • 최진아 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 손용훈 (서울대학교 환경계획연구소)
  • Received : 2023.06.01
  • Accepted : 2023.08.27
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There is a clear need to enhance the attractiveness of rural areas by leveraging their core assets to respond to emerging mega-trends. This paper analyzes the progress of the direct payment program that has been implemented to preserve agricultural landscapes in rural areas, using spatial information data. The study identified the planting characteristics of landscape crops, spatial utilization characteristics of the system, and utilization characteristics of the system by the beneficiaries. According to the analysis, the spatial utilization characteristics of the system could be classified into eight types: tourism resources and nearby agricultural areas, designation across the entire rural area, agricultural areas around villages, large-scale agricultural areas, small-scale agricultural areas, scattered and dispersed areas, independent parcels of land, and ranches. Based on the characteristics and limitations of the landscape preservation direct payment system, this study provides directions for future rural specialized zones. The landscape preservation direct payment system focuses on income support for farmers and providing agricultural benefits in terms of public interest. Meanwhile, the landscape agricultural zone serves as a rural specialized zone, highlighting the need to explore the direction of integrated rural landscape management. It is important for farmers, as the key stakeholders, to preserve the agricultural landscape in rural areas. Forming community-level cooperatives and engaging in relevant activities are crucial for achieving this goal. In order to actively preserve the agricultural landscape, it is necessary to consider the resumption of financial support for village landscape preservation activities, along with the designation of landscape agricultural zones. There is a need to conduct a specific review and explore measures to accommodate the designated landscape complexes at the local government level. The higher the ratio of designated landscape complexes, the more agricultural landscape management based on public value has been carried out. The designation of such landscape complexes can be seen as a demand for voluntary utilization of agricultural landscapes in the region. Moreover, as the ratio of designated landscape complexes increases, it becomes evident that farmers at the village level actively participate in agricultural landscape preservation and contribute to providing public value or utilize it as a tourism resource. This highlights the need for managing agricultural landscapes at the village level within the appropriate context.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 농촌진흥청 농업 정책지원 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 수행되었음.(과제번호: RS-2022-RD009984, 과제명: 농촌다움 보전을 위한 농촌공간 재생능 평가체계 구축)

References

  1. An, P. G., Eom, S. J., Cho, S. Y., and Kim, S. B. (2020). A Study on the Creation Rural Experience Village Reflecting the Travel Trends of the Post-Corona: A Case of Wi-bong Village in Jeollabuk-do. KSRP, 26(4), 27-39.
  2. Chae, H. S., Shin, S. A., Lee, J. Y., Lee, G. Y., Choi, O. H., Cho, J. Y., Ryu, S. J., and Ahn, T. M. (2006). Improvement Strategy by Survey Analysis on the Direct Payment Program for Rural Landscape Conservation in Korea. KSRP, 12(4), 115-123.
  3. Choi, J. A., Kim, S. B., Kim, E, J., Park, M, J., and Lim, C. S. (2016). A Study on Rural Landscape Management and Regional action plan. RDA.
  4. Choi, J. A. (2021). Evaluation of Functions of Public Benefit of Rural Landscape based on Landscape Ecology, Buan-gun, Doctoral dissertation, Jeonbuk National University.
  5. Chung, C. M. (2005). A Study on the Direct Payback System for the Preservation of Sustainable Scenic Agriculture. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 17(3), 191-210.
  6. Jang, H. S., Gim, U. S., and Um, D. H. (2007). Improvement Strategy by Case Study on the Direct Payment Program for Rural Landscape Preservation: Bonghwa-gun, Chungwon-gun, Hongsung-gun. KSRP, 13(4), 69-77.
  7. Kim, K. S., and Lee, S. J. (2004). A Study on the Change Process and Characteristics of the Development Policy in Rural Areas. Journal of the Korean Institute of Rural Architecture, 6(3), 1-14.
  8. Kim, M. Y., and Kim, K. N. (2009). The Status and Improvement Proposal of the Direct Payment Program for Rural Landscape Conservation. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 16(4), 837-867.
  9. Kim, S. J., Kim, D. G., Choi, M. S., Cho, J. H., Lee, S. B., Lim, D. I., Cho, H. J., M, C., Park, Y. H., and Lee, G. P. (2019). Policy Directions for Rural Land Use Planning System, KRIHS.
  10. Kim, Y. J., Lee, S. H., and Son, Y. H. (2021). Changes and Applications of Rural Tourism in the Post-COVID-19 Era through Social Data Analysis. KSRP, 27(4), 43-54.
  11. Kim, Y. J., and Son, Y. H. (2022a). Residents' Perception and Evaluation of New Ruralism Using IPA: Focusing on the Regional Leader Group in Gochang- gun. KSRP, 28(1), 99-108.
  12. Kim, Y. J., and Son, Y. H. (2022b). Types of Living Areas according to the Flow Characteristics of Rural Dwellers using Mobile Floating Population Data. KSRP, 28(2), 61-69.
  13. Kim, Y. J. (2023). Appraisal of Rural Area Based on New Ruralism Perspective: The Case Study of Gochang County using De Facto Population Awareness and Geospatial Data, Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  14. Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation. (2022). 「Urban Planning Status」 Statistical Information Report.
  15. Lee, J. M. (2020). Finding Rural Regions in Si-Gun-Gu Level Applying OECD Regional Typology. JKPA, 55(4), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2020.08.55.4.50
  16. Lee, Y. J., and Lee, S. H. (2020). The Improvement Plans for Landscape Conservation Direct Payment System through IPA Analysis. Journal of the Korea Landscape Council, 12(2), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.36466/KLC.12.2.5
  17. Lee, Y. J., Yoo, H. Y., Lee, S. H., Lee, D. Y., and Kim, J. K. (2020). A Study on the Improvement of the Landscape Conservation Direct Payment System by Reforming the Public Interest Direct Payment System, MAFRA.
  18. Li, Y., Westlund, H., and Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003
  19. Lichter, D. T., and Brown, D. L. (2011). Rural America in an Urban Society: Changing Spatial and Social Boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 565-592. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150208
  20. MAFRA. (2020). Guidelines for Implementing Agri-Food Projects.
  21. OECD. (2016). OECD Regional Outlook 2016. Productive Regions for Inclusive Societies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  22. Park, J. H., and Hwang, H. C. (2012). A Comparative Study on the Attitudes between Residents, Officials and Experts towards Direct Payment Program for Rural Landscape Conservation. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 18(3), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2012.18.3.137
  23. ROKG. (2019). 5th Comprehensive National Territorial Plan.
  24. Seong, J. I., and Park, J. Y. (2008). A Study on the Effects and the Development Issues of the Direct Payment Program for Rural Landscape Conservation. Journal of Rural Tourism, 15(1), 85-111.
  25. Shim, J. H., Song, M. R., Han, Y, C., and Seo, H. J. (2019). Rural Prospects and Planning Strategies on Rural Development(Year 1 of 3). KREI.
  26. Song, M. R., and Park, K. C. (2005). Policies for the Rural Landscape Preservation : Trends and Lessons. Journal of Rural Development, 28(3), 121-137.
  27. Um, D. H., Sim, W. B., Yun, J. O., Lee, C. S., and Yu, S. O. (2004). A study on the implementation plan of the direct payment system for landscape preservation. Rural Research Institute.
  28. Wilson, G. A., and Burton, R. J. F. (2015). 'Neo-productivist' agriculture: Spatio-temporal versus structuralist perspectives. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.02.003
  29. Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture-A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 639-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008