DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Inclusive Nutrition Education Direction for Sustainable Dietary Competency in Elementary Schools

초등학교 식생활교육에서 지속가능 식생활 역량 함양을 위한 포용적 식생활교육의 방향

  • Kim, Hyun Joo (Dept.of Practical Arts of Education, Chinju National University of Education)
  • 김현주 (진주교육대학교 실과교육과)
  • Received : 2022.12.13
  • Accepted : 2023.03.03
  • Published : 2023.03.31

Abstract

Since the enactment of the School Meal Support Act in 2009, South Korean dietary education has been evolving, placing health, environment, and consideration as its core values. The 3rd Basic Plan for Dietary Education (2020-2024) aims to achieve a sustainable dietary lifestyle that civic agriculture for collective consumption, healthy citizens, and an inclusive society. However, the digital civilization of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is significantly impacting dietary education in schools. Therefore, this study examines sustainable dietary education content in South Korean school meals, diagnoses the phenomena of dietary education facing digital transformation in education due to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and explores directions for inclusive dietary education through concrete structures and content systems for inclusive dietary education that foster sustainable dietary capabilities. To achieve inclusive dietary education, a structure and system that allow cognitive, normative, and practical learning to be combined in an inclusive way is required. Furthermore, to practice sustainable dietary education, alternative approaches that emphasize the development of learners' core competencies are necessary in the direction of inclusive dietary education that fosters inclusivity.

우리나라 식생활교육은 2009년 식생활교육지원법이 제정되면서 건강, 환경, 배려를 핵심 가치로 삼아 변화되기 시작하였으며, 제3차 식생활교육 기본 계획(2020년-2024년)에서는 지속가능한 식생활로 함께 하는 농업, 건강한 국민, 포용하는 사회 실현을 비전으로 제시하고 있다. 그러나 4차 산업혁명의 디지털 문명은 학교 식생활교육에도 큰 영향을 미치고 있다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 우리나라 학교 식생활교육에서 지속가능한 식생활교육 내용을 살펴보고, 4차 산업혁명으로 인한 교육의 디지털 전환에 직면한 식생활교육 현상을 진단하고, 지속가능한 식생활 역량 함양을 위하여 포용적 식생활교육 구조와 내용 체계의 구체성을 통해 포용적 식생활교육의 방향을 탐색하였다. 포용적 식생활교육을 위해서는 인지적 학습, 정의적 학습, 실천적 학습이 포용적 방식으로 융합될 수 있는 구조와 체계가 필요하며, 지속가능한 식생활교육을 실천하기 위해서는 학습자 핵심 역량 함양에 중점을 두는 포용적 식생활교육의 방향에서 그 대안을 마련해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2018학년도 진주교육대학교 연구비 지원을 받아 작성되었음.

References

  1. All Education, Digital Transformation Goal (2021). https://zdnet.co.kr
  2. Choi, S. Y., & Han, J. (2022). Development and effectiveness analysis of sustainable dietary free-year program for the improvement of youth empowerment. Journal of Home Economics Education Research, 34(2), 129-152.
  3. Daum (2022). Language online dictionary. http://www.daum.net
  4. Food and Beverage Newspaper (2021, November 03). Food industry speeding up ESG management...evaluation result 'good'. http://www.thinkfood.co.kr, Search.
  5. Joint Ministries (2020). The 3rd dietary education basic plan (2020-2024).
  6. Kim, J. W. (2018). Paradigm shift to sustainable dietary education from the confusion of dietary education and nutrition education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 24(4), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2018.24.4.017
  7. Kim, J. W. (2019). Virtual reality (VR) based sustainable food education contents for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 32(4), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.24062/kpae.2019.32.4.45
  8. Kim, J. W. (2021). Implications of global sustainable food education practices by school levels. Korean J Food Cook Sci, 37(4), 328-339. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2021.37.4.328
  9. Kim, J. W., Lee, E. J., & Sang, E. Y. (2020). Establishment of a "Food Life Classroom" platform for sustainable food education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 26(4), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2020.26.3.003
  10. Kim, J. Y., & Sim, K. H. (2011). The actual conditions and recognition of dietary life education in elementary school after execution of the dietary life education support act. The Korean Society of Food And Nutrition, 24(3), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2011.24.3.295
  11. Kim, H. J. (2013). A study on the current status and exploring the new possibility of dietary education for school children-Focusing on sensory education-. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 26(2), 59-82.
  12. Kim, H. J. (2015). The modern food culture and ethical conditions of dietary life education. Environmental Philosophy, 19, 172-196.
  13. Kim, H. J. (2021). The 2021 online exhibition on dietary education (Session 1). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM_a3c4bmeQ
  14. Kim, H. J. (2022). The role and task of inclusive dietary life education in elementary school dietary life education in the era of the 4th industrial revolution. Journal of Elementary School, 38(1), 1-22.
  15. Kim, J. K., & Nam, Y. S. (2016). A study on sustainable dietary education through analysis of content elements of the 2015 revised elementary school curriculum. Proceedings of the winter Korean Society for Environmental Education Conference (pp. 130-134). Jeollanam-do: Korean Society for Environmental Education Association.
  16. Kim, T. J. (2022). Competency-based education innovation plan for innovative inclusive growth. Korea Educational Development Institute, IP2020-03, Seoul, Korea.
  17. KSP News (2021, November 26). [Special Feature] Ministry of education, 2022 revised curriculum announcement of major issues. KSP News. https://www.kspnews.com
  18. Hong, S. J. (2016), Exploring the direction of school education in preparation for the intelligent information society. Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation 2016 Issue Paper, ORM 2016-26-9. 1-29.
  19. Hwang, M. Y. (2009). Sustainable agriculture and rural development and dietary education. Proceedings of the East Asian Dietary Society Conference (pp. 2-9) Gyeongsangbuk-do: The asian Dietary Society Association.
  20. Jeon, S. K. (2019). Analysis of core concepts and achievement standards in 'Home Life' in practical arts curriculum for the connection and convergence lesson plan of practical subjects. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 32(3), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2019.25.4.003
  21. Jung, H. R. (2017). The 4th industrial revolution and dietary life. Proceedings of the Spring Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference (pp. 34-52) Jeollabuk-do: Korean Home economics Education Association.
  22. Lee, S. S. (2017). The 4th industrial revolution, changes of dietary life and exploration of Direction of dietary life education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 30(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.20954/jkpae.2017.30.1.1
  23. Lee, Y. C., Lee, K. A., & Kim, J. W. (2021). Development and application of sustainable food competency evaluation tools. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 34(2), 43-63.
  24. Lee, E. J. (2017). Trends and direction of dietary education research in elementary School. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 30(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.24062/kapae.30.1.83
  25. Lee, E. J., & Kim, J. W. (2019a). Development of sustainable dietary education objective and content system for improving elementary students' food literacy. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 30(1), 145-160.
  26. Lee, E. J., & Kim, J. W. (2019b). Development of sustainable diet education contents by elementary school grade group. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 30(3), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.30.3.201909.19
  27. Lee, H. J., & Lee, J. H. (2020). The development of creative convergence program using augmented reality(AR) for college students on english-dietary education. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 11(2), 941-956.
  28. Lee, J. E., & Yu, N. S. (2022). Development of sustainable dietary life teaching-learning plans to implement the sustainable development. Journal of Home Economics Education Research, 34(3), 149-167.
  29. Lee, K. (2022). Content analysis of Practical Arts curriculum and textbooks from the perspective of sustainable dietary education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 28(1), 77-104. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2022.28.1.05
  30. Ministry of Education (2015). Practical arts subject(technology and home economics)/information curriculum (No. 74). Sejong: Author.
  31. Ministry of Education (2021). Future-oriented curriculum promotion plan (draft) with the public. Curriculum Policy Division. Sejong: Author.
  32. OECD (2018). OECD learning frame work 2030.
  33. Park, S. H. (2020). The need for monitoring Inclusiveness in Education. Korea Educational Development Institute (IP 2020-11), Seoul, Korea.
  34. Song, W. C., & Chung, D. H. (2021). Explication and rational conceptualization of metaverse. Informatization Policy, 28(3), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2021.28.3.003
  35. UNESCO (2017). A guide to ensuring inclusiveness and equity in education. Paris, UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002482/248254e.pdf(2023.1.14. Search.)
  36. UNESCO (2020). Teacher education for inclusion: five countries across three continents, Background paper prepared for the 2020 Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002482/248254e.pdf(2023.1.14. Search.)
  37. World Commision on Environment and Development (1987). Brundtland report, 'our common future'. New York: Author.