대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제50권3호
  • /
  • Pages.307-317
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유구치 인접면 우식증 수복 시 지르코니아 전장관과 기성금속관의 생존율 비교 평가: 후향적 연구

Comparative Evaluation of the Survival Rates of Zirconia Crown and Stainless Steel Crown for Proximal Caries in Primary Molars: a Retrospective Study

  • 정가희 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이난영 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 신혜원 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 박수현 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 지명관 (조선대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Gahui Jeong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Nanyoung Lee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Hyewon Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Suhyun Park (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Myeongkwan Jih (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2023.06.07
  • 심사 : 2023.07.14
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

심미성에 대한 요구가 증가함에 따라 유구치 수복을 위한 지르코니아 전장관은 더 활발하게 사용되고 있으나, 지르코니아 전장관으로 수복한 치아를 장기간 추적 관찰하거나 다른 재료와 비교한 연구는 많지 않다. 따라서 이 연구의 목적은 인접면 우식증에 대한 지르코니아 전장관과 기성금속관의 36개월 동안의 생존율을 비교하여 평가하고, 각 기성관의 수복 실패 양상을 분석하는 것이다. 2017년부터 2019년까지 조선대학교 치과병원 소아치과와 두 개의 개인 치과의원에 내원하여 두 기성관으로 수복 치료를 받은 498명 환자에 대한 1,061개의 유구치에 대한 전자의무기록지와 방사선 사진을 수집하고 분석하였다. 생존분석 결과, 기성금속관으로 수복한 치아의 생존율이 지르코니아 전장관에 비해 유의하게 높았다. 치수 치료 시행 여부를 나눠 생존 분석을 시행한 결과, 치수 치료를 시행하지 않은 경우, 기성금속관의 생존율이 지르코니아 전장관에 비해 유의하게 높았던 반면, 치수 치료를 시행한 경우에는 두 기성관의 생존율에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 기성금속관의 주된 수복실패 원인은 비정상적 치근 흡수 또는 치근단 투과상 병소의 발생이었고, 지르코니아 전장관의 경우 수복물의 탈락이었다. 이 연구는 임상가들에게 구치부 기성관 재료 선택 시 참고 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이라 생각된다.

Due to increasing demand for aesthetics, zirconia crowns have become a popular choice for treating primary molars. However, there is limited literature available comparing the survival rates of zirconia crowns with those of other restorative materials. The objective of this study was to compare the 36-month survival rates of zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns for proximal caries, as well as to analyze failure types associated with each crown type. Electronic medical records and radiographs of 1,061 primary molars from 498 patients treated with 2 types of prefabricated crowns at Chosun University Dental Hospital and 2 private dental clinics between 2017 and 2019 were collected and analyzed. The survival rate of zirconia crowns was found to be lower compared to that of stainless steel crowns. Regarding the groups without pulp treatment, the survival rate of stainless steel crowns was significantly higher than that of zirconia crowns. However, in the groups that received pulp therapy, no significant difference in the survival rates was observed between the two preformed crowns. Notably, abnormal root resorption or periapical lesions were identified as the primary cause of restorative failure in stainless steel crowns, whereas loss of restoration was the predominant cause in zirconia crowns. This study holds valuable implications for clinicians when selecting preformed crowns for primary molars.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by research fund from Chosun University Dental Hospital, 2021.

참고문헌

  1. Patel MC, Bhatt RK, Khurana SM, Patel NG, Bhatt RA : Choice of Material for the Treatment of Proximal Lesions in Deciduous Molars among Paediatric Post Graduates and Paediatric Dentists of Gujarat: A Cross Sectional Study. Adv Hum Biol, 9:258-263, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4103/AIHB.AIHB_67_19
  2. Novaes TF, Matos R, Celiberti P, Braga MM, Mendes FM : The influence of interdental spacing on the detection of proximal caries lesions in primary teeth. Braz Oral Res, 26:293-299, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000400002
  3. Allison PJ, Schwartz S : Interproximal contact points and proximal caries in posterior primary teeth. Pediatr Dent, 25:334-340, 2003.
  4. Sengul F, Gurbuz T : Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 39:315-321, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.315
  5. Chen K, Lei Q, Xiong H, Chen Y, Luo W, Liang Y : A 2-year clinical evaluation of stainless steel crowns and composite resin restorations in primary molars under general anaesthesia in China's Guangdong province. Br Dent J, 225:49-52, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.519
  6. Zahdan BA, Szabo A, Gonzalez CD, Okunseri EM, Okunseri CE : Survival rates of stainless steel crowns and multi-surface composite restorations placed by dental students in a pediatric clinic. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 42:167-172, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-42.3.1
  7. Murali G, Mungara J, Vijayakumar P, T K, Kothimbakkam SSK, Akr SP : Clinical Evaluation of Pediatric Posterior Zirconia and Stainless Steel Crowns: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 15:9-14, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2125
  8. Abuelniel G, Eltawil S : Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Stainless Steel versus Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars: Randomized Controlled Trial. Egypt Dent J, 64:977-989, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.76940
  9. Kaushik M, Masih U, Mahay P, Goyal A, Ajmera H, Daryani H : Comparative Evaluation Of Commercially Available Stainless Steel Crowns: An In-Vitro Study. Univ J Dent Sci, 7:91-95, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21276/ujds.2021.7.3.27
  10. Padmapriya S, Krishnappa S, Srinath S : Success Rate of Zirconia Crowns over Stainless Steel Crowns in Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent, 4:212-218, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3094
  11. Alamoudi RA, Walia T, Debaybo D : Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of NuSmile Pedodontics Zirconia Crowns in Pulp-Treated Primary Teeth-2 Years Follow-Up Study. Eur J Dent, 17:82-90, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742129
  12. Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A : Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars. J Fam Med Prim Care, 9: 1418-1423, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1006_19
  13. Hanafi L, Altinawi M, Comisi JC : Evaluation and comparison two types of prefabricated zirconia crowns in mixed and primary dentition: A randomized clinical trial. Heliyon, 7:E06240, 2021.
  14. Harshitha K, Rao HTA, Hegde KS, Sargod SS, Mahaveeran SS, Devan A : Comparative evaluation on clinical success rate of prefabricated zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns in primary molars. Int J Oral Health Dent, 7:180-186, 2021. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2021.036
  15. Seale NS : The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 24:501-505, 2002.
  16. Duggal M, Gizani S, Albadri S, Kramer N, Stratigaki E, Tong HJ, Seremidi K, Kloukos D, BaniHani A, Santamaria RM, Hu S, Maden M, Amend S, Boutsiouki C, Bekes K, Lygidakis N, Frankenberger R, Monteiro J, Anttonnen V, Leith R, Sobczak M, Rajasekharan S, Parekh S : Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 23:659-666, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00718-6
  17. Nikhil DKR, Krishnamoorthy SH, Savitha NS, Allwin A, Nandan S : Clinical evaluation of zirconia and stainless-steel crowns in primary molars - A randomized control trial. Int J Pedo Rehabil, 7:30-38, 2022. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjpedorehab.v7i2.571
  18. Tremblay L, Lovsin T, Zecevic C, Lariviere M : Perceptions of self in 3-5-year-old children: a preliminary investigation into the early emergence of body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 8:287-292, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.04.004
  19. Pani SC, Saffan AA, AlHobail S, Bin Salem F, AlFuraih A, AlTamimi M : Esthetic Concerns and Acceptability of Treatment Modalities in Primary Teeth: A Comparison between Children and Their Parents. Int J Dent, 2016:3163904, 2016.
  20. Fishman R, Guelmann M, Bimstein E : Children's selection of posterior restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 31:1-4, 2006. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.31.1.ng7122836mp04vj5
  21. Agrawal R, Khanduja R, Singhal M, Gupta S, Kaushik M : Clinical Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crown versus Zirconia Crown in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 15:15-19, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2134
  22. Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, Lou J : Comparison of Amount of Primary Tooth Reduction Required for Anterior and Posterior Zirconia and Stainless Steel Crowns. Pediatr Dent, 38:42-46, 2016.
  23. Alzanbaqi SD, Alogaiel RM, Alasmari MA, Al Essa AM, Khogeer LN, Alanazi BS, Hawsah ES, Shaikh AM, Ibrahim MS : Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19:2838, 2022.
  24. Chen Y, Li H, Li M, Yang L, Sun Q, Chen K : Analysis of survival and factors associated with failure of primary tooth pulpectomies performed under general anaesthesia in children from South China. Int J Paediatr Dent, 30:225-233, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12589
  25. Bang SJ, Han MR, Kim JB, Lee JH, Kim JS, Shin JS : A Retrospective Study on the Effect of Pulp Treatment on the Exfoliation of Primary Teeth. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 50:24-34, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2023.50.1.24
  26. Yang B, Lange-Jansen HC, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M : Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater, 24:508-513, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.013
  27. Mulder R, Medhat R, Mohamed N : In vitro analysis of the marginal adaptation and discrepancy of stainless steel crowns. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand, 4:20-29, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1444995
  28. Choi JE, Jeong TS, Kim S : A Morphometric study on the primary molars and preformed stainless steel crown. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 28:355-362, 2001.
  29. Guclu ZA, Caliskan S, Efe Z, Dogan S : Can zirconia crowns be the first restorative choice after endodontic treatment of primary teeth? Int J Clin Pract, 75:E14888, 2021.
  30. Jeong YY, Nam OH, Kim MS, Lee HS, Choi SC : Repair Rate of Composite Resin Restorations in Permanent First Molar in Children Under 12 Years Old. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 45:370-377, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2018.45.3.370
  31. Alomari Q, Al-Saiegh F, Qudeimat M, Omar R : Recurrent caries at crown margins: making a decision on treatment. Med Princ Pract, 18:187-192, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1159/000204348
  32. Lopez-Cazaux S, Aiem E, Velly AM, Muller-Bolla M : Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials, 20:530, 2019.
  33. Alhissan AS, Pani SC : Factors Influencing the Survival of Preformed Zirconia Crowns in Children Treated under General Anesthesia. Int J Dent, 2021:5515383, 2021.
  34. Srinivasan SR, Mathew MG, Jayaraman J : Comparison of Three Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molar Teeth: a 36-month Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent, 45:117-124, 2023.
  35. Yang B, Lange-Jansen HC, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M : Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater, 24:508-513, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.013
  36. Ninawe N, Joshi S, Badhe H, Honaje N, Bhaje P, Barjatya K : Zirconia Crowns In Pediatric Dentistry: A Review. J Posit Sch Psychol, 6:1718-1724, 2022.
  37. Kim JY, Park H, Lee J, Seo H : Comparison of Bonding Strength by Cleaning Method of Pediatric Zirconia Crown Contaminated with Saliva or Blood. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 45:185-194, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2018.45.2.185