DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microscopic Image-based Cancer Cell Viability-related Phenotype Extraction

현미경 영상 기반 암세포 생존력 관련 표현형 추출

  • Misun Kang (Department of Computer Software Engineering, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 강미선 (순천향대학교 컴퓨터소프트웨어공학과)
  • Received : 2023.05.02
  • Accepted : 2023.05.18
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

During cancer treatment, the patient's response to drugs appears differently at the cellular level. In this paper, an image-based cell phenotypic feature quantification and key feature selection method are presented to predict the response of patient-derived cancer cells to a specific drug. In order to analyze the viability characteristics of cancer cells, high-definition microscope images in which cell nuclei are fluorescently stained are used, and individual-level cell analysis is performed. To this end, first, image stitching is performed for analysis of the same environment in units of the well plates, and uneven brightness due to the effects of illumination is adjusted based on the histogram. In order to automatically segment only the cell nucleus region, which is the region of interest, from the improved image, a superpixel-based segmentation technique is applied using the fluorescence expression level and morphological information. After extracting 242 types of features from the image through the segmented cell region information, only the features related to cell viability are selected through the ReliefF algorithm. The proposed method can be applied to cell image-based phenotypic screening to determine a patient's response to a drug.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다(No. RS-2022-00165681). 본 연구에서 사용된 암세포 현미경 영상 데이터는 삼성서울병원 연구센터로부터 제공받아서 수행되었으며 이에 감사드립니다.

References

  1. Connor S. Glaxo chief: Our drugs do not work on most patients. The Independent. 2003;8:1-2. 
  2. Fontanella A. Equivalent/generic drugs use. To whom? When? How?. Italian Journal of Medicine. 2014;8(2):77-79.  https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2014.472
  3. Fetz V, Prochnow H, Bronstrup M, Sasse F. Target identification by image analysis. Natural product reports. 2016;33(5):655-667.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NP00113G
  4. Singh S, Carpenter AE, Genovesio A. Increasing the content of high-content screening an overview. Journal of biomolecular screening. 2014;19(5): 640-650.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057114528537
  5. Liberali P, Snijder B, Pelkmans L. Single-cell and multivariate approaches in genetic perturbation screens. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2015;16(1):18-32.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3768
  6. Adel E, Elmogy M, Elbakry H. Image stitching based on feature extraction techniques: a survey. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2014;99(6): 1-8.  https://doi.org/10.5120/17374-7818
  7. Ghosh D, Kaabouch N. A survey on image mosaicing techniques. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation. 2016;34:1-11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2015.10.014
  8. Seo JH, Yang S, Kang MS, Her NG, Nam DH, Choi JH, Kim MH. Automated stitching of microscope images of fluorescence in cells with minimal overlap. Micron. 2019;126:102718. 
  9. Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Susstrunk S. SLIC superpixels. EPFL-REPORT-149300, 2010. 
  10. Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Susstrunk S. SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. 2012;34(11):2274-2282.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.120
  11. Teague MR. "Image analysis via the general theory of moments." JOSA 70.8 1980;920-930.  https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.70.000920
  12. Aurenhammer F. Voronoi diagrams-a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 1991;23(3):345-405.  https://doi.org/10.1145/116873.116880
  13. Wang J, Ju L, Wang X. An edge-weighted centroidal Voronoi tessellation model for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2009;18(8):1844-1858.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2009.2021087
  14. Wilkinson L, Friendly M. The history of the cluster heat map. The American Statistician, 2009;63(2):179-184.  https://doi.org/10.1198/tas.2009.0033
  15. Urbanowicz RJ, Meeker M, La Cava W, Olson RS, Moore J H. Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2018;85:189-203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014
  16. Kononenko I. Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF. In ECML. 1994;94:171-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57868-4_57