감성과학 (Science of Emotion and Sensibility)

  • 제26권2호
  • /
  • Pages.3-12
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-8593(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-613X(eISSN)
한국감성과학회 (Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of COVID-19 Anxiety on Vigor and Innovative Work Behavior: Mediated Moderation of Flexible Work Arrangement

  • 투고 : 2022.05.13
  • 심사 : 2023.05.15
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The present study examines the impact of COVID-19 anxiety on employees' psychological resources and behaviors, drawing on the conservation of resources theory. We also investigate whether flexibility in work contexts has a meaningful effect on employees' responses to the pandemic. A total of 284 working adults participated in an online survey consisting of self-reporting questionnaires that assessed levels of COVID-19 anxiety, vigor, innovative work behavior, and flexible working arrangements. The results showed that the level of vigor mediated the positive relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and innovative work behavior, and the perceived level of flexible working arrangements moderated this mediation effect positively. The findings highlight the importance of considering employees' psychological resources and work arrangements in managing the negative impact of COVID-19-related anxiety. This study provides theoretical and practical implications for organizations to better understand the psychological processes that employees undergo during a crisis. Further research on diverse work settings and cultural backgrounds is needed to expand on the present findings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C.-Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-9. 
  2. Albort-Morant, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Leal-Rodriguez, A., & Giorgi, G. (2020). How does positive workrelated stress affect the degree of innovation development? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 520. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020520 
  3. Almer, E. D., & Kaplan, S. E. (2002). The effects of flexible work arrangements on stressors, burnout, and behavioral job outcomes in public accounting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14(1), 1-34.  https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2002.14.1.1
  4. Basadur, M. (1992). Managing creativity: A Japanese model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 6(2), 29-42.  https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1992.4274394
  5. Basadur, M. (1997). Organizational development interventions for enhancing creativity in the workplace. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 59-72.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00781.x
  6. Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vegaxy, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 77-100.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.x
  7. Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower. 
  8. Goolsby, J. R. (1992). A theory of role stress in boundary spanning positions of marketing organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(2), 155-164. DOI: 10.1177/0092070392202006 
  9. Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Shulkin, S. (2008). Schedule flexibility and stress: Linking formal flexible arrangements and perceived flexibility to employee health. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 199-214.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802024652
  10. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. (pp. xvii, 507). Guilford Press. 
  11. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
  12. Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1039-1050. DOI: 10.5465/3069447 
  13. Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523.  https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005001
  14. Korunka, C., Kubicek, B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hoonakker, P. (2009). Work engagement and burnout: Testing the robustness of the job demandsresources model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 243-255. DOI: 10.1080/17439760902879976 
  15. Mache, S., Servaty, R., & Harth, V. (2020). Flexible work arrangements in open workspaces and relations to occupational stress, need for recovery and psychological detachment from work. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 15(1), 5. DOI: 10.1186/s12995-020-00258-z 
  16. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 
  17. Rapp, D. J., Hughey, J. M., & Kreiner, G. E. (2021). Boundary work as a buffer against burnout: Evidence from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106, 1169-1187. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000951 
  18. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. DOI: 10.1177/0013164405282471 
  19. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. 
  20. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. 
  21. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour.
  22. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. John Wiley & Sons. 
  23. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1993.3997517 
  24. Wu, C.-H., Luksyte, A., & Parker, S. K. (2015). Overqualification and subjective well-being at work: The moderating role of job autonomy and culture. Social Indicators Research, 121, 917-937.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0662-2
  25. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
  26. Zhou, J., & Woodman, R. W. (2003). Managers' recognition of employees' creative ideas: A social-cognitive model, The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 631-640). Pergamon. DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50043-7