Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of Designation of Agricultural Heritage for Rural Regeneration

농촌 재생을 위한 농업유산 지정 효과 측정 연구

  • 도지윤 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 정명철 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원)
  • Received : 2023.08.10
  • Accepted : 2023.08.19
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was aimed to derive the following regional characteristics and implications by reviewing the effects of local communities and overseas cases through agricultural heritage and related systems to prepare rural regeneration measures using agricultural and rural heritage. First, The study was examined to improve the awareness to improve awareness of the value and preservation of heritage through the designation of agricultural heritage. However, it was found that it was necessary to prepare for social problems such as the aging population in the future. Second, most of the residents' perceptions showed a positive perception of the designation of agricultural heritage, but they were somewhat less recognized in terms of economics, so it was found that regeneration measures were needed to compensate for this. Third, as a result of applying the effect measurement model, the preservation and management effect that meets the purpose of the system is high, and the effect varies depending on projects such as local governments and residents' councils. Fourth, as a result of examining rural regeneration measures through overseas cases, it was found that rather than large-scale development, various cultural and natural resources and activation measures were prepared by expanding the scope to surrounding areas. This study was conducted only on agricultural heritage areas, but it is meaningful that agricultural and rural heritage should be reviewed from various perspectives suitable for the current trend, and it is meaningful in that it considers not only local residents' perception but also regional effects and revitalization measures.

본 연구는 농업·농촌유산을 활용한 농촌 재생 방안을 마련하기 위하여 농업유산과 관련 제도를 통해 발생하는 지역사회 효과 검토와 해외 사례를 고찰함으로써 다음과 같은 지역 특성과 시사점을 도출할 수 있었다. 첫째, 농업유산 지정을 통해 유산의 가치 및 보전에 관한 인식 향상을 도모할 수 있었다. 그러나 추후 발생할 인구 고령화 등 사회문제에 대비할 수 있는 지역의 보전·관리 방안 마련이 필요한 것을 알 수 있었다. 둘째, 주민 인식은 농업유산 지정에 대하여 대부분 긍정적 인식을 보였으나, 경제적인 부분에서는 인식이 다소 떨어지므로 이를 보완할 수 있는 재생 방안이 필요함을 파악할 수 있었다. 셋째, 효과측정 모델을 적용한 결과 제도의 목적에 부합하는 보전·관리 효과가 높게 나타나고 있으며, 지자체와 주민협의체 등의 사업에 따라 효과에 차이가 있으므로 재생 방안 마련 시 목표 지향적인 대안이 필요한 것을 알 수 있었다. 넷째, 해외 사례를 통한 농촌 재생 방안을 살펴본 결과 대규모의 개발보다는 다양한 문화·자연 자원과 주변 지역까지 범위를 확대하여 활성화 방안을 마련하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 농업유산 지역만을 대상으로 연구를 수행하였으나, 현재 흐름에 걸맞은 다양한 관점으로 농업·농촌유산을 검토해야 할 것으로 판단되며, 지역주민 인식뿐만 아니라 전문가 설문 등 지역의 지정 효과와 활성화 방안을 함께 고찰한 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국립농업과학원 농업과학기술 연구개발사업(PJ01711203)에 의해 이루어진 것임.

References

  1. An PG, Eom SJ, Kim YG, Kim SB. 2021. A Study on the Introduction of the RURITAGE Concept for the Utilization of Rural Resources -Agricultural Heritage Districts and Historical Villages-. The Korean Journal of Community Living Science 32(4): 731-749.
  2. Beak SS. 2017. A Proposal for Conservation and Management Policy on Korea's Important Agricultural Heritage. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 35(2): 98-107.
  3. Cha DW, Oh CH. 2022. Terrestrial Insect Fauna of Persimmon Plantation in Sangju Dried Persimmon Agricultural Area, National Important Agricultural Heritage System. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 36(1): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2022.36.1.56
  4. Choi DS, Oh CH. 2019. Change of Flora and Land Use Types in Globally Important Agriculture Heritage System Gudeuljang Irrigated Rice Terraces, Cheongsando, Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology Conference Paper (1): 77-78.
  5. Choi JA, You JW, Kim EJ, Kim SB, Lim CS. 2014. The Analysis of Indicators for Walking Trail Management in Agricultural Areas by AHP. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Tourism 21(2): 7-23.
  6. Chung CK. 2020. Public Polocy Making. Seoul: Deamyung.
  7. Do JY, Jeong MC. 2022. A Study on the Change of Visitor's Perception with the Implementation of Korean Important Agricultural Heritage System: The Field Agricultural Area of the Volcanic Island in Ulleung. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 31(3): 173-183.
  8. Gang SG. 2013. The actual conditins and the problem of rural tourism. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 10(384): 36-42.
  9. Im TB. 1996. Articles : A Study on the Negative Effects of Agricultural Subsidy Policies; From the Sociological Interaction Perspectives. Korean Policy Studies Review 5(2): 136-160.
  10. Jeong MC, Mun HY, Kim MH. 2014. A Study on the Classification Scheme of the Rural Intangible Heritage According to GIAHS. Korean Jounal of Agricultural History 13(1): 51-84.
  11. Kim DC, Choi WY. 2014. IPA Study of Landscape Petentiality of Agricultural and Fishery Heritages - A Focus on Cheongsando -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(4): 76-88.
  12. Kim JH, Jung MC. 2019. Development of Rural Tourism Program for Dynamic Conservation of Agricultural Heritage. Northeast Asia tourism research (NATR) 15(4): 255-274.
  13. Kim JH, Jung MC. 2020. Development of Resident Participation-type Agricultural Heritage Monitoring Indicators. Northeast Asia tourism research (NATR), 16(4): 23-47.
  14. KRAHS. 2021. A Study on the Establishment of an Agricultural Heritage Monitoring System for Residents' Participation. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  15. Kwon BK, Jeong MC. 2018. The Implementation of Korea Important Agricultural Heritage System Policy and Future Tasks (4): 105-129.
  16. Lee HK, Shin YS. 2019. A Comparative Analysis on Economic Evaluation Methods of the Public Values of Agricultural and Rural Area. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture Conference Paper 2019(0): 263-264.
  17. Lee JM. 2011. Derivation of HRD Policy Direction in the Field of Green Technology Using AHP Methodology. Journal of Korea Contents Association 11(6): 350-359.
  18. Lee SH, Jeong SM. 2019. Effects of "Walking City, Seoul" Policy and Directions for Future Researches. The Seoul Institute : 1-83.
  19. Lim JW, Son YH. 2021. A Study on the Landscape Characteristics of Jeju Woljeong-ri Batdam as an Agricultural Heritage Systems. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 27(3): 57-68. 10.7851/ksrp.2021.27.3.057
  20. Lim KK. 2021. A Study of the Development Strategies of Sustainable Agri-Tourism through Agricultural Haritage - Focused on Byeongyeong-myeon, Gangjin-gun -. Jorunal of Photo Geography (Sajin Chiri) 31(1): 75-89.
  21. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2021. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems.Japanese Agricultural Heritage Systems.World Heritage of Irrigation Facilities.
  22. Park KS, Lim KU. 2020. A Study on the Activation of Agricultural Tourism through Ecomuseum. Jorunal of Photo Geography (Sajin Chiri) 30(2): 148-159.
  23. Park MJ, Jeon JB, Son HG, Shin MJ, Park RU. 2019. A Study on Public Effect of Rural Tourism Development Project on the Rural Community. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 61(5): 57-68.
  24. Rho WJ. 1991. Public Poilcy Analysis. Seoul: Bubmunsa. 
  25. Saaty TL. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  26. Saaty TL. 2003. Multi Criteria Decision Making the Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGrawHill, New York.
  27. Sha DC. 2019. Reflections of the Public Interest Values in the Framework Act on Agricultural Food. The Law Reasearch Institutute of Hongik Univ. 20(3): 423-447.
  28. UNU-IAS.Bioversity International.IGES.UNDP. 2014. Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio- ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS). United Nations University Institute of Advanced Study of Sustainability.
  29. Yoon JS. 2013. Determining the Priority of Lifelong Education Promotion Policy in Gyeongsangnam-do through AHP Analysis. Journal of Korea Contents Association 13(5): 517-526. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.05.517
  30. Yoon SD, Choi YJ, Choi JS, Lee SM. 2017. 2016 Rural Index. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences.
  31. https://www.ruritage.eu