DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Home Economics Teachers' Perception on Process-Based Assessment Using the Concerns-Based Adoption Model

CBAM을 활용한 가정과교사의 과정중심평가 인식조사

  • Bae, Jinhee (Dept. of Human Ecology & Interdisciplinary Program in Sustainable Living System, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Yu, Nan Sook (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea University)
  • 배진희 (고려대학교 대학원 생활과학과, 지속가능생활시스템융합전공 ) ;
  • 유난숙 (고려대학교 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2023.09.15
  • Accepted : 2023.10.11
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

This study investigates the perceptions, Stages of Concern (SoC), and Levels of Use (LoU) regarding process-based assessment among Home Economics (HE) teachers to determine the necessary support for its implementation in schools. Data were gathered from a survey administered to HE teachers. The results are as follows. First, HE teachers viewed process-based assessment favorably, valuing its multifaceted evaluation approach over result-based assessment. The feedback from process-based assessments was seen as an opportunity for reflection for both educators and students. While some teachers expressed uncertainty about the optimal timing of implementation, they generally demonstrated a sound understanding of the feedback concept within the assessment process. HE teachers were predominantly concerned with their own professional expertise and the learning outcomes of their students. The majority of HE teachers have utilized process-based assessments for at least one semester. None deemed it irrelevant to their practice or showed disinterest in its adoption. Those who had yet to implement it were either in the first(introduction) or the second(preparation) stages.

본 연구는 가정과교사의 과정중심평가에 대한 전반적 인식과 관심도, 실행도를 진단하여 학교현장에서의 내실 있는 과정중심평가 실행에 필요한 알맞은 지원책을 알아보았다. 이를 위해 전국의 가정과교사를 대상으로 CBAM을 활용하여 과정중심평가에 대한 전반적 인식과 관심도, 실행도를 묻는 설문조사를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료를 분석한 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정과교사들은 과정중심평가를 긍정적으로 인식하고 있었으며, 이는 과정중심평가가 결과중심평가에 비해 학생을 다면적으로 평가할 수 있다는 점과 가정과교사들이 과정의 교육적 가치를 중요하게 인식하고 있기 때문임을 살펴볼 수 있었다. 또한 과정중심평가가 학생과 교사 모두에게 더 유익하다고 인식하고 있었으며, 이는 피드백이 교사와 학생 모두에게 성찰의 기회를 제공한다고 생각하기 때문임을 파악할 수 있었다. 가정과교사들은 과정중심평가의 실행 시기에 관해서는 혼란을 보였으나, 과정중심평가에서의 피드백의 의미와 활용에 대해서는 비교적 높은 이해수준을 보였다. 둘째, 과정중심평가에 대한 관심도는 4단계(결과적 관심)에서 가장 높게 나타났다. 즉, 가정과교사들은 과정중심평가를 실행함으로써 개인의 전문성과 학생의 학습에 어떠한 결과나 나타날지에 가장 관심을 두고 있다고 해석할 수 있다. 셋째, 실행도 측면에서 대다수의 가정과교사들은 이미 한 학기 이상 현장에서 과정중심평가를 실행하고 있는 것으로 드러났다. 과정중심평가를 자신과 무관하다고 생각하거나, 실행에 관심을 두지 않는 교사는 보이지 않았으며, 미실행 중일지라도, 과정중심평가에 대한 정보를 조사하고 있는 1수준(입문) 상태이거나, 과정중심평가 실시 시기를 계획하는 등 실행을 위해 준비하고 있는 2수준(준비) 상태인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Institutes for Research (n.d.). SEDL ARCIVE. https://sedl.org/cbam/
  2. Bae, K.-H. (2021). A study on remote learning of early childhood teachers based on CBAM. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Baek, S.-H., Lee, H.-J., & Han, Y.-S. (2006). Teachers' recognition on the optimization of the educational contents of clothing and textiles in practical arts or technology & home economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 18(3), 97-117.
  4. Ban, J.-C., Kim, S., Park, C., & Kim, H. K. (2018). Teachers' perceptions on the teacher by teacher process fortified assessment policy. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 21(3), 105-130. http://doi.org/10.22799/jce.2018.21.3.005
  5. Chae, J.-H., & Hwang, S.-K. (2002). Evaluation of ICT-utilized lessons on the based on CBAM model by home economics teachers. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 14(2), 37-52.
  6. Choi, M., Park, M., & Chae, J.-H. (2011). Middle school home economics teachers stages of concern and levels of use about career education: Based on CBAM(the Concerns Based Adoption Model). Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(4), 49-65.
  7. Cho, S. K. (2006). The stages of concern, innovation configurations as well as the level of use and analysis of their relationship to each other shown by physical education teachers of middle school regarding 7th physical education curriculum. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  8. Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312006002207
  9. Hall, G. E., George, A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC Questionnaire (Report No. 3032). Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 147 342).
  10. Jeong, J. (2020). A study on the orientation of educational evaluation based on the analysis of the educational meaning and its difficulties of the process-based evaluation. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(4), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.15754/jkpe.2020.42.4.009
  11. Jung, M.-J., & Chae, J.-H. (2004). A study on Home Economics teachers concern for performance assessment and its implementation. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 16(1), 79-91.
  12. Kang, H. Y., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H., Lee, H., Tak, B., Cho, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2018). A study on professional development program for mathematics teachers about process-focused assessment. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(3), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.08.28.3.321
  13. Kang, E. Y., & Park, M. J. (2020). Development and implementation of a process-based evaluation program on school space design: Focusing on the housing life area of home economics curriculum in middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(4), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.12.32.4.81
  14. Ko, E. M., Heo, Y. S., & Chae, J. H. (2021). Development of the teaching-learning process plan for process-based assessment in home economics of middle school: Focusing on the life design unit. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 33(1), 101-127. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.101
  15. Ko, H. (2019). The study on the perception, actual condition, and support strategies of process-centered assessment by each teacher. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(9), 1137-1164. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.9.1137
  16. Ko, J. Y. (2020). Changes in the stages of concerns about scientific core competency and recognition and implementation of 2015 national science curriculum of biology teachers participated in Level 1 biology teacher qualification training. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea.
  17. Koo, J. (2019). A study on applying a process-focused assessment of discussion and debate in 2015 revised social studies curriculum. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 51(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.51.3.201909.001
  18. Kim, H.-N., & Kim, D.-H. (2010). The characteristics of theses and dissertations related to Levels of Use(LoU) of CBAM in Korea. The Journal of Korean Educational Idea, 24(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17283/jkedi.2010.24.2.1
  19. Kim, J. (2018). The concept and educational implication of process-focused assessment. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(20), 839-859. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.20.839
  20. Kim, J., & Lee, J. (2020). An investigation of teachers' stages of concern and levels of use about SW education based on concerns-based adoption model. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(8), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.08.075
  21. Kim, J. K. (1999). Implementing progress the practical reasoning home economics instruction on concerns based adoption model. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
  22. Kim, J.-K., & Chae, J.-H. (2001). Implementing progress the practical reasoning home economics instruction on concerns based adoption model. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 13(3), 1-11.
  23. Kim, S. (2020). The concept analysis and application proposal of process based assessment. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(5), 317-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.24159/joec.2020.26.5.317
  24. Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2023). An analysis of chemistry teachers' stages of concern and level of use on competency assessment based on CBAM. Journal of Science Education, 47(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2023.47.1.24
  25. Kim, S., Kim, H., Bae, G., & Chang, J. (2022). A validation of process-based assessement scale for middle school teachers' expertise. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(12), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2022.22.12.420
  26. Kim, S., & Paik, S. (2016). An analysis of science teachers' stages of concern and levels of use on descriptive assessment. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 60(5), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.353
  27. Kim, S. H. (2019). The development of an assessment rubric of appinventor program based on process-focused assessments. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  28. Kim, S. M. (2020). An analysis of elementary special education teachers' stages of concern and level of use of process-based assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea.
  29. Kim, S.-W. (2021). Analysis of middle school teachers concern and levels of use for process-based assessment. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(4), 527-549. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.4.527
  30. Kim, S.-W., & Suh, W.-S. (2020). An analysis on the stages of secondary school teachers' concern and levels of use for process-based assessment. Teacher Education Research, 59(2), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.59.2.202006.273
  31. Kim, S.-W., Zhang, K., & Suh, W.-S. (2021). Analysis of the importance and performance of middle school teachers for process-based evaluation. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(17), 429-441. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.17.429
  32. Kim, Y. H. (2020). An analysis on the stages of teachers' concern and levels of their use for the process-based assessment in high schools. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea.
  33. Kim, Y. L. (2022). Metaverse based classes diagnosis and adoption exploration for home economics teachers: Applying the CBAM. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
  34. Lee, I., Park, M., & Chae, J. H. (2012). Home economics teachers' concern on creativity and personality education in home economics classes: Based on the concerns based adoption model(CBAM). Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(2), 117-134.
  35. Lee, K.-H., Kang, H. Y., Ko, E.-S., Lee, D.-H., Shin, B., Lee, H. C., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Exploration of the direction for the practice of process-focused assessment. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(4), 819-834.
  36. Lee, S.-M. (2008). Home economics teachers awareness and concern stages of 2007 revised curriculum. Unpublished master's thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
  37. Lim, J-.H., & Choi, W.-S. (2018). A study on characteristics and meanings of 'process-focused evaluation' in the free semester program. The Journal of Korean Education, 45(3), 31-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.22804/jke.2018.45.3.002
  38. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2015). National guidelines for elementary and secondary curriculum (2015-80 Annex 1). Sejong: Author.
  39. Ministry of Education [MOE] & Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation [KICE] (2017). 과정을 중시하는 수행평가 어떻게 할까요? [How to conduct a performance evaluation that focuses on the process] (ORM 2017-19-2). Sejong and Chungbuk: Author.
  40. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2021). 2022 revised curriculum general guidelines highlight [Draft]. Sejong: Author.
  41. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2022). Practical arts(technology & home economics)/informations curriculum (2022-33 Annex 10). Sejong: Author.
  42. Oh, H. J. (2003). The stages of concern and levels of use about discretionary activity curriculum and the influencing factors. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  43. Park, C. (2017). A meaning of assessment in classroom. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 30(3), 397-413.
  44. Park, D. S. (2000). 학교교육 평가의 방향과 사회과 평가에의 시사점 [Direction of school education evaluation and implications for social studies evaluation]. Social Studies Education, 33, 5-15.
  45. Park, J., Jin, K., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2018). 과정 중심 평가 내실화를 위한 교사의 평가 전문성 신장 방안 연구 [A study for enhancing the teacher' expertise in student assessment for stabilizing process-fortified assessment policy] (RRE 2018-5). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchReport.do?cn=TRKO201900002178
  46. Park, J. S. (1994). An investigation of teacher's stages-of-concern and levels-of-use toward curriculum. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
  47. Park, M. O. (2012). A study on teacher perception and classroom practice of practical inference-focused home economics instruction: Focused the concerns-based adoption model. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
  48. Park, S. Y. (2008). The stages of concern about and the actual state of practicing visual literacy education among middle school fine art teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  49. Park, Y. S. (2021). A study of arguments and implications on the meaning of process-focused assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
  50. Shin, H., Ahn, S., & Kim, Y. (2017). A policy analysis on the process-based evaluation: Focusing on middle school teachers in seoul. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20(2), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2017.20.2.135
  51. Son, S. H. (2008). A study on the meaning of curriculum implementation and innovation configuration: Trends of research and the implication for future studies. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 29(2), 1-20.
  52. Yi, J.-E., & Shin, J.-H. (2012). An analysis of teachers' stage of concerns and implementation on the 2007 revised curriculum based on CBAM. Teacher Education Research, 51(1), 137-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.15812/ter.51.1.201204.137
  53. Yi, J.-Y., & Kim, Y. (2023). An action research on the implementation of the process-oriented assessment in major courses for the pre-service english teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 23(4), 139-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2023.23.4.139