DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Unveiling the Effect of TechTubers' Unboxing Videos on Consumer Buying Behavior

  • Md Imran HOSSAIN (Department of Business Administration, College of Economics and Management, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Md Mahiuddin SABBIR (Department of Marketing, University of Barishal) ;
  • Hyung Jun KIM (Department of Business Administration, College of Economics and Management, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2023.07.03
  • Accepted : 2023.08.05
  • Published : 2023.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: The study examines the effect of TechTubers' unboxing videos on consumer buying behavior by highlighting the role of product touch, visual and verbal sensory cues. The study integrates the vicarious touch and the dual coding theory to analyze the Smartphone purchase behavior of Generation Z. Research design, data and methodology: The study collected data from 349 respondents who were viewers of YouTube unboxing videos. A structured questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale was employed as a survey instrument. Convenience sampling technique was utilized to select the samples. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: Results reveal that vicarious touch and verbal description have a statistically significant positive effect on Generation Z's purchase intention of Smartphone. Moreover, purchase intention positively affects Generation Z's actual purchase behavior of Smartphone. However, the visual images did not significantly affect purchase intention. Conclusions: The study offers significant theoretical and practical implications. The study adds new knowledge to the extant literary field by highlighting the impact of digital product presentation in the form of Unboxing videos on purchase intention for technology products. Moreover, the study suggests content sponsorship and advertising opportunities for marketers in collaboration with the TechTubers on YouTube unboxing video platform.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The study was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant number: 2022S1A5A2A030531601231482092640102).

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Aref, M. M., & Okasha, A. E. (2020). Evaluating the online shopping behavior among Egyptian college-educated community. Review of Economics and Political Science, 5(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-10-2018-0013
  3. Berg, M. (2018). How this 7-year-old made $22 million playing with toys. Forbes Magazine.
  4. Bhutto, M. Y., Soomro, Y. A., & Yang, H. (2022). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Young Consumer Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances (Evidence From Developing Economy). SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221078289
  5. Blythe, M., & Cairns, P. (2009). Critical methods and user generated content: the iPhone on YouTube. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1467-1476.
  6. Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003
  7. Burnaz, S., & Acikgoz, F. (2021). The influence of "influencer marketing" on YouTube influencers. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 15(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijima.2021.10036966
  8. Chaithra, V. D. (2019). Hybrid approach: naive bayes and sentiment VADER for analyzing sentiment of mobile unboxing video comments. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 9(5), 4452-4459. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4452-4459
  9. Chen, G., Ye, Z., & Liu, Y. (2022). Cognitive mechanisms of observing others touching products increases purchasing intention: An eye-tracking study. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03221-9
  10. Chen, Y.-L., Chang, C.-L., & Yeh, C.-S. (2017). Emotion classification of YouTube videos. Decision Support Systems, 101, 40-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.05.014
  11. Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 643-654. https://doi.org/10.1086/209001
  12. Craig, D., & Cunningham, S. (2017). Toy unboxing: living in a(n unregulated) material world. Media International Australia, 163(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17693700
  13. Dou, K., Yu, P., Deng, N., Liu, F., Guan, Y., Li, Z., Ji, Y., Du, N., Lu, X., & Duan, H. (2017). Patients' Acceptance of Smartphone Health Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 5(12), e177. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7886
  14. Filieri, R., Lin, Z., Pino, G., Alguezaui, S., & Inversini, A. (2021). The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers' behavioral intention and decisions. Journal of Business Research, 135, 663-675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.055
  15. Forbes, P. (2021). The Anatomy Of A Killer Unboxing Video: How and Why. https://packhelp.com/unboxing-phenomenon-why-people-watch-unpacking-videos/
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1)(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  17. Friesen, G. B. (2004). Redefining B2C: From" Business to Consumer" to" Building Toward Community"! Consulting to Management, 15(1), 21.
  18. Garcia, V. H. (2019). TechTubers: Why companies are collaborating with them to generate customer trust? https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-tech-companiessponsoring-reviewers-review-productsgarcia/?articleId=6611346664458371073
  19. Geyser, W. (2022). 12 Best Types of YouTube Content To Succeed at Growing a YouTube Channel. https://influencermarketinghub.com/types-of-youtube-content/
  20. Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 129-151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90008-L
  21. Google. (2014). The Magic Behind Unboxing on YouTube. https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/marketing-strategies/video/youtube-insights-stats-data-trends-vol7/#:~:text=So it's no surprise that,season (and even beyond).
  22. Habib, A. (2021, November 4). Mobile data users to double by 2030. https://www.thedailystar.net/business/telecom/news/mobile-data-users-double-2030-2221721
  23. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  24. Hartland, W., Biddle, C., & Fallacaro, M. (2008). Audiovisual facilitation of clinical knowledge: a paradigm for dispersed student education based on Paivio's Dual Coding Theory. AANA Journal, 76(3).
  25. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  26. Huang, T.-L., & Chen, Y.-M. (2014). Young audiences' emotional experience on smartphone film: an application of dual-coding theory. Young Consumers, 15(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2013-00384
  27. Izagirre-Olaizola, J., Fernandez-Sainz, A., & Vicente-Molina, M. A. (2015). Internal determinants of recycling behaviour by university students: a cross-country comparative analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12147
  28. Jaakkola, M. (2020). From vernacularized commercialism to kidbait: toy review videos on YouTube and the problematics of the mash-up genre. Journal of Children and Media, 14(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1693409
  29. Jensen, J. A., Walsh, P., Cobbs, J., & Turner, B. A. (2015). The effects of second screen use on sponsor brand awareness: a dual coding theory perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(2), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2014-0861
  30. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2004). Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 111-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045817
  31. John, S. P., & De'Villiers, R. (2020). Elaboration of marketing communication through visual media: An empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102052.
  32. KEMP, S. (2022, February 15). DIGITAL 2022: BANGLADESH. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-bangladesh
  33. Ki, E.-J., & Hon, L. C. (2007). Testing the linkages among the organization-public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(1), 1-23.
  34. Kim, H. (2020). Unpacking Unboxing Video-Viewing Motivations: The Uses and Gratifications Perspective and the Mediating Role of Parasocial Interaction on Purchase Intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(3), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1828202
  35. Kim, M. (2019). Digital product presentation, information processing, need for cognition and behavioral intent in digital commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 362-370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.011
  36. Kim, M., & Lennon, S. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 146-178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20204
  37. Kim, M., & Lennon, S. J. (2000). Television shopping for apparel in the United States: Effects of perceived amount of information on perceived risks and purchase intentions. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 28(3), 301-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X00283002
  38. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65-100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5
  39. Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753-5760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171
  40. Lee, M., & Lee, H.-H. (2022). Do parasocial interactions and vicarious experiences in the beauty YouTube channels promote consumer purchase intention? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(1), 235-248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12667
  41. Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. (2020). Healthcare wearable devices: an analysis of key factors for continuous use intention. Service Business, 14(4), 503-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00428-3
  42. Li, C., Liu, Y., & Du, R. (2021). The Effects of Review Presentation Formats on Consumers' Purchase Intention. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.20211101.oa46
  43. Li, M., Huang, L., Tan, C. H., & Wei, K. K. (2013). Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(4), 101-136. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170404
  44. Lightner, N. J., & Eastman, C. M. (2002). User preference for product information in remote purchase environments. J. Electron. Commer. Res., 3(3), 174-186.
  45. Liu, Y., Zang, X., Chen, L., Assumpcao, L., & Li, H. (2018). Vicariously touching products through observing others' hand actions increases purchasing intention, and the effect of visual perspective in this process: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 39(1), 332-343.
  46. Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140-151.
  47. Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., Hedgcock, W., & Xu, Y. (2022). Observing Product Touch: The Vicarious Haptic Effect in Digital Marketing and Virtual Reality. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(2), 306-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211059540
  48. Marsh, J. (2016). 'Unboxing' videos: co-construction of the child as cyberflaneur. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1041457
  49. McAvoy, D. (2017). Guilty Pleasures, or Nobrow Treasures? BT - When Highbrow Meets Lowbrow: Popular Culture and the Rise of Nobrow (P. Swirski & T. E. Vanhanen (eds.); pp. 181-205). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95168-0_9
  50. McCarthy, A. (2017). Gen Z really likes watching product reviews on YouTube. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-really-likes-watching-product-reviews-on-youtube-2017-3
  51. Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800306
  52. Mowlabocus, S. (2020a). 'Let's get this thing open': The pleasures of unboxing videos. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 564-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418810098
  53. Mowlabocus, S. (2020b). 'Let's get this thing open': The pleasures of unboxing videos. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 564-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418810098
  54. Nelson, M. R., & McLeod, L. E. (2005). Adolescent brand consciousness and product placements: awareness, liking and perceived effects on self and others. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(6), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00429.x
  55. Oster, E. (2014). his Gen Z Infographic Can Help Marketers Get Wise to the Future. https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/gen-z-infographic-can-help-marketers-get-wise-future-159642/
  56. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and cognitive processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  57. Papathanassis, A., & Knolle, F. (2011). Exploring the adoption and processing of online holiday reviews: A grounded theory approach. Tourism Management, 32(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.12.005
  58. Park, M. (2006). The compensatory effects of pictorial and verbal information for haptic information on consumer responses in non-store shopping environments. The Ohio State University.
  59. Peck, J., Barger, V. A., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.001
  60. Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612
  61. Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614
  62. Pino, G., Amatulli, C., Nataraajan, R., De Angelis, M., Peluso, A. M., & Guido, G. (2020). Product touch in the real and digital world: How do consumers react? Journal of Business Research, 112, 492-501.
  63. Reid, D. J., & Beveridge, M. (1986). Effects of text illustration on children's learning of a school science topic. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 294-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1986.tb03042.x
  64. Ruiz Mafe, C., Sanz Blas, S., & Fernando Tavera-Mesias, J. (2010). A comparative study of mobile messaging services acceptance to participate in television programmes. Journal of Service Management, 21(1), 69-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231011025128
  65. Sabbir, M. M., Taufique, K. M. R., & Nomi, M. (2021). Telemedicine acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic: User satisfaction and strategic healthcare marketing considerations. Health Marketing Quarterly, 38(2-3), 168-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2021.1986988
  66. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2007). Toward a unified theory of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530714
  67. Shen, H., Zhang, M., & Krishna, A. (2016). Computer interfaces and the "direct-touch" effect: Can iPads increase the choice of hedonic food? Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0563
  68. Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
  69. Smith, S. P. (2006). Online vicarious-experience: using technology to help consumers evaluate physical products over the Internet. September. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/39193%0Afile:///bitstream/handle/11343/39193/67140_00002926_02_online_vicarious.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  70. Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742.
  71. Tsao, W.-C., & Hsieh, M.-T. (2015). eWOM persuasiveness: do eWOM platforms and product type matter? Electronic Commerce Research, 15, 509-541.
  72. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the Relations between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830-846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830
  73. UNFPA. (2022). Population trends. https://bangladesh.unfpa.org/en/node/24314
  74. Uzunoglu, E., & Kip, S. M. (2014). Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 592-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.007
  75. Vaudrey, R. K. (2022). A practice unpacked: Unboxing as a consumption practice. Journal of Business Research, 145(February 2021), 843-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.021
  76. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  77. Verbran, R. (2022). How To Sell More By Simply Showing This Body Part. https://www.newneuromarketing.com/how-to-sell-more-by-simply-showing-this-body-part
  78. Waddill, P. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1988). Illustrations as adjuncts to prose: A text-appropriate processing approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 457.
  79. Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Van der Voort, T. H. A. (2000). The impact of television, print, and audio on children's recall of the news. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00747.x
  80. Walters, G., Sparks, B., & Herington, C. (2007). The effectiveness of print advertising stimuli in evoking elaborate consumption visions for potential travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507302376
  81. Xu, P., Chen, L., & Santhanam, R. (2015). Will video be the next generation of e-commerce product reviews? Presentation format and the role of product type. Decision Support Systems, 73, 85-96.
  82. Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114-122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019
  83. Yang, D., & Ma, M.-Y. (2020). The Impact of Quality Attribute on Purchase Intention Take Unboxing Video as an Example BT - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research (H. Shoji, S. Koyama, T. Kato, K. Muramatsu, T. Yamanaka, P. Levy, K. Chen, & A. M. Lokman (eds.); pp. 88-96). Springer Singapore.
  84. Yang, S.-B., Hlee, S., Lee, J., & Koo, C. (2017). An empirical examination of online restaurant reviews on Yelp. com: A dual coding theory perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.