DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Two new records of Laurencia decussata and L. pacifica from Korea based on morphological structures and molecular data

  • Received : 2023.11.30
  • Accepted : 2023.12.22
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

Laurencia is a red algal genus that was described by J.V. Lamouroux in 1813. The main characteristics of this genus have been known as the presence of four pericentral cells in an axial segment, secondary pit connections between adjacent epidermal cells, and the presence of corps en cerise in both epidermal and trichoblast cells. Additionally, the tetrasporangia are arranged in a parallel manner, and male branches feature terminal cup-shaped spermatangial pits. Currently, sixteen Korean Laurencia species have been reported based on their morphological characteristics. In this study, Laurencia decussata and L. pacifica have been added as new records to the Korean algal flora based on a combination of morphological observations and molecular analyses of rbcL sequences. Laurencia decussata has expanded from Australia and New Zealand to Korea, while the distribution of L. pacifica has expanded from USA and Mexico to Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a research fund from Chosun University (2023) to T. O. Cho.

References

  1. Abbott IA and GJ Hollenberg. 1992. Marine Algae of California. Stanford University Press. California, USA. pp. 1-844.
  2. Abe T, M Masuda, S Kawaguchi and S Kamura. 1998. Taxonomic notes on Laurencia brongniartii (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycol. Res. 46:231-237. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1835.1998.00141.x
  3. Abe T, M Masuda, S Kawaguchi, T Itoh and M Suzuki. 1997. Additional analysis of chemical diversity in Laurencia nipponica (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Phycol. Res. 45:173-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.1997.tb00072.x
  4. Cassano V, Y Metti, AJK Millar, MC Gil-Rodriguez, A Senties, J Diaz-Larrea MC Oliveira and MT Fujii. 2012. Redefining the taxonomic status of Laurencia dendroidea (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from Brazil and the Canary Islands. Eur. J. Phycol. 47:67-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2011.647334
  5. Cecere E, M Cormaci, G Furnari, A Petrocelli, O Saracino and D Serio.1996. Benthic algal flora of Cheradi Islands (Gulf of Taranto, Mediterranean Sea). Nova Hedwigia 62:191-214.
  6. Cribb AB. 1958. Records of marine algae from south-eastern Queensland. III. Laurencia Lamx. University of Queensland Papers, Department of Botany. Brisbane, Australia. pp. 159-191.
  7. Edler D, J Klein, A Antonelli and D Silvestro. 2021. raxmlGUI 2.0: A graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12:373-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13512
  8. Freshwater DW and J Rueness. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of some European Gelidium. Gelidiales, Rhodophyta. species, based on rbcL nucleotide sequence analysis. Phycologia 33:187-194. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-33-3-187.1
  9. Fujii MT, V Cassano, A Senties, J Diaz-Larrea, M Machin-Sanchez and MC Gil-Rodriguez. 2012. Comparative analysis of the corps en cerise in several species of Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Atlantic Ocean. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 22:795-804. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2012005000067
  10. Furnari G, M Cormaci, D Serio and WF Prud'homme van Reine. 2016. Is the transfer of Chondria glandulifera (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) to the genus Chondrophycus (as Chondrophycus glandulifer) taxonomically correct? Not. Algarum 7:1-8.
  11. Garbary D and J Harper. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of the Laurencia complex (Rhodomelaceae) of the red algae. Cryptog. Algol. 19:185-200. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.309511
  12. Gavio B and S Fredericq. 2002. Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) is the correct name of the non-native species in the Atlantic known as Grateloupia doryphora. Eur. J. Phycol. 37:349-359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967026202003839
  13. Guiry MD and GM Guiry. 2023. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org. Accessed December 15, 2023.
  14. Harizani M, E Ioannou and V Roussis. 2016. The Laurencia Paradox: An endless source of chemodiversity. pp. 91-252. In: Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products 102 (Kinghorn A, H Falk, S Gibbons and J Kobayashi, eds.). Springer. Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33172-0_2
  15. Harvey WH. 1852. Nereis Boreali-Americana: or Contributions to a History of the Marine Algae of North America. Part II: Rhodospermeae. Smithsonian Institution. Washington D.C.
  16. Huelsenbeck JP and F Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
  17. Kylin H. 1941. Californische Rhodophyceen. Acta Univ. Lund 37:1-51.
  18. Lamouroux JV. 1813. Essai sur les genres de la famille des Thalassiophytes non articulees. Annales du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle 20:21-47, 115-139, 267-293.
  19. Lee YP and SY Kang .2001. A Catalogue of the Seaweeds in Korea. Jeju National University Press. Jeju, Korea. pp. 1-662.
  20. Lin SM, S Fredericq and MH Hommersand. 2001. Systematics of the Delesseriaceae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) based on large subunit rDNA and rbcL sequences, including the Phycodryoideae, subfam. nov. J. Phycol. 37:881-899. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01012.x
  21. Machin-Sanchez M, V Cassano, J Diaz-Larrea, A Senties, MT Fujii and MC Gil-Rodriguez. 2012. Morphological and molecular evidence demonstrates the amphi-Atlantic distribution of Laurencia catarinensis (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Bot. Marina 55:241-252. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2011-0049
  22. Masuda M, T Abe, T Suzuki and M Suzuki. 1996. Morphological and chemotaxonomic studies on Laurencia composita and L. okamurae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 35:550-562. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-35-6-550.1
  23. McDermid KJ. 1988. Section V. Laurencia (Rhodophyta, Rhodomelaceae). pp. 221-256. In: Taxonomy of Economic Seaweeds with Reference to Some Pacific and Caribbean Species Volume II (Abbott IA, ed.). California Sea Grant College Program, University of California. La Jolla, California.
  24. Metti Y. 2022. Based on morphology and molecular data, Palisada rigida comb. nov. and Laurencia decussata comb. et stat. nov. (Rhodophyta, Rhodomelaceae) are proposed. Algae 37:15-32. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2022.37.2.21
  25. Metti Y, AJK Millar, V Cassano and MT Fujii. 2013. Australian Laurencia majuscula (Rhodophyta, Rhodomelaceae) and the Brazilian Laurencia dendroidea are conspecific. Phycol. Res. 61:98-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/pre.12009
  26. Nam KW, CA Maggs and DJ Garbary. 1994. Resurrection of the genus Osmundea with an emendation of the generic delineation of Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 33:384-395. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-33-5-384.1
  27. Nam KW, Y Saito and CH Sohn. 1991. Vegetative structure and reproduction of Laurencia nipponica Yamada (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Algae 6:1-12.
  28. Nam KW. 1994. Vegetative and male reproductive anatomy of Laurencia intercalaris sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) in Korea. J. Plant Biol. 37:421-428.
  29. Nam KW. 2006. Phylogenetic re-evaluation of the Laurencia Complex (Rhodophyta) with a description of L. Succulenta sp. Nov. from Korea. J. Appl. Phycol. 18:679-697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-006-9073-3
  30. Nam KW. 2011. Algal Flora of Korea. Volume 4, Number 3. Rhodophyta: Florideophyceae: Ceramiales: Rhodomelaceae: Laurencia, Chondrophycus, Palisada, Chondria. Marine Red Algae. National Institute of Biological Resources. Incheon, Korea.
  31. Oliveira-Filho EC. 1969. Algas Marinhas do Sul do Estado do Espirito Santo(Brasil). I - Ceramiales. Bol. Fac. Filos. Cienc. E. Let. Universidade Sao Paulo. Botanica. 26:7-277. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-5988.v26i1p7-277
  32. Rindi F, I Papi and F Cinelli. 1996. New records of Ceramiales (Rhodophyta) for the North-Western Mediterranean. Cryptogam. Algol. 17:223-238. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.309452
  33. Ronquist F and JP Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
  34. Rousseau F, D Gey, A Kurihara, CA Maggs, J Martin-Lescanne, C Payri, B Reviers, A Sherwood and L Gall. 2017. Molecular phylogenies support taxonomic revision of three species of Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta), with the description of a new genus. Eur. J. Taxon. 269:1-19. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.269
  35. Saito Y. 1964. Contributions to the morphology of the genus Laurencia of Japan, I. Bull. Fac. Fish., Hokkaido Univ. 15:69-74.
  36. Saito Y. 1967. Studies on Japanese species of Laurencia, with special reference to their comparative morphology. Mem. Fac. Fish., Hokkaido Univ. 15:1-81.
  37. Schneider CA, WS Rasband and KW Eliceiri. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9:671-675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
  38. Tamura K, G Stecher and S Kumar. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38:3022-3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
  39. Wynne MJ, D Serio, M Cormaci and G Furnari. 2005. The species of Chondrophycus and Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales) occurring in Dhofar, the Sultanate of Oman. Phycologia 44:497-509. https://doi.org/10.2216/00318884(2005)44[497:TSOCAL]2.0.CO;2