DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Internal Radiation Dose Due to Inhalation of Particles by Workers in Coal-Fired Power Plants in Korea

국내 석탄화력발전소 내 작업종사자의 입자 흡입에 따른 내부피폭 방사선량 평가

  • Do Yeon Lee (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Yong Ho Jin (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Min Woo Kwak (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Ji Woo Kim (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwang Pyo Kim (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • 이도연 (경희대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 진용호 (경희대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 곽민우 (경희대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 김지우 (경희대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 김광표 (경희대학교 원자력공학과)
  • Received : 2023.05.17
  • Accepted : 2023.06.15
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

Coal-fired power plants handle large quantities of coal, one of the most prominent NORM, and the coal ash produced after the coal is burned can be tens of times more radioactive than the coal. Workers in these industries may be exposed to internal exposure by inhalation of particles while handling NORM. This study evaluated the size, concentration, particle shape and density, and radioactivity concentrations of airborne suspended particles in the main processes of a coal-fired power plant. Finally, the internal radiation dose to workers from particle inhalation was evaluated. For this purpose, airborne particles were collected by size using a multi-stage particle collector to determine the size, shape, and concentration of particles. Samples of coal and coal ash were collected to measure the density and radioactivity of particles. The dose conversion factor and annual radionuclide inhalation amount were derived based on the characteristics of the particles. Finally, the internal radiation dose due to particle inhalation was evaluated. Overall, the internal radiation dose to workers in the main processes of coalfired power plants A and B ranged from 1.47×10-5~1.12×10-3 mSv y-1. Due to the effect of dust generated during loading operations, the internal radiation dose of fly ash loading processes in both coal-fired power plants A and B was higher than that of other processes. In the case of workers in the coal storage yard at power plants A and B, the characteristic values such as particle size, airborne concentration, and working time were the same, but due to the difference in radioactivity concentration and density depending on the origin of the coal, the internal radiation dose by origin was different, and the highest was found when inhaling coal imported from Australia among the five origins. In addition, the main nuclide contributing the most to the internal radiation dose from the main processes in the coal-fired power plants was thorium due to differences in dose conversion factors. However, considering the external radiation dose of workers in coal-fired power plants presented in overseas research cases, the annual effective dose of workers in the main processes of power plants A and B does not exceed 1mSv y-1, which is the dose limit for the general public notified by the Nuclear Safety Act. The results of this study can be utilized to identify the internal exposure levels of workers in domestic coal-fired power plants and will contribute to the establishment of a data base for a differential safety management system for NORM-handling industries in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 원자력안전위원회의 재원으로 한국원자력안전재단의 지원을 받아 수행한 원자력안전연구사업의 연구결과입니다(No. 2105035).

References

  1. ARPNSA. 2008. Management of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM). Radiation Protection Series No. 15. 
  2. IAEA. 2005. Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM IV). IAEA TECDOC 1472. 
  3. IAEA. 2005. Derivation of Activity Concentration Values for Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance. Safety Reports Series No. 44. 
  4. ICRP. 2019. Radiological Protection from Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) in Industrial Processes. ICRP Publication 142. 
  5. EURATOM. 2013. Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM. European Atomic Energy Community. 
  6. IAEA. 2006. Assessing the Need for Radiation Protection Measures in Work Involving Minerals and Raw Materials. IAEA Safety Report Series No. 49. 
  7. IEA. 2022. Coal 2022 Analysis and forecast to 2025. 
  8. Pepin S, Dehandschutter B, Poffijn A and Sonck M. 2013. Norm contamination and Radiation Protection of Workers in a Belgian Coal Fired Power Plant: A Case Study. Annales de l'Association belge de Radioprotection, Vol. 38, nr.3. 
  9. Baeza A, Cancio D, Corbacho JA, Mora JC, Robles B and Suanez A. 2007. "Radiological impact of a coal fired power station in Spain," The Fifth International Symposium on Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (19-22 March 2007), Poster Session 3.1. 
  10. Garg A, Chauhan RP and Sushil K. 2014. Estimation of Annual Radiation dose Received By Some Industrial Workers. ISSN No. 0976-903X. 
  11. Dal-Molin F, Fisher R, Frost D, Anderson DR and Read D. 2017. Dose assessment from chronic exposure to industrial NORM in iron ore processing. J. Radiol. Prot. 37(2):402-421. 
  12. UNSCEAR. 2022. Sources, Effects and Risk of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report Volume IV13. Dorrian MD, Bailey MR. 1995. Particle size distributions of radioactive aerosols measured in work places. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 60(2):119-133. 
  13. Ji SW, Jang JH, Do TG and Kim KP. 2018. Radiation Dose Assessment to Workers Due to NORM Inhalation in the Korean Phosphate Industry. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 73(7):1007-1011. 
  14. ICRP. 1994. Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication 66. 
  15. Kim KP, Wu C-Y, Birky BK and Bolch WE. 2007. TENORM aerosols in the Florida Phosphate Industry-assessment of lung fluid solubility and annual effective dose to workers. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 123(1):41-55. 
  16. Marple V. 2004. History of impactors-The first 110 years. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38:247-292. 
  17. Department of Mines and Petroleum. 2010. Managing Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) in Mining and Mineral Processing. NORM 3.5. 
  18. EPA. 1994. Methods for Derivation of Inhalation Reference Concentrations and Application of Inhalation Dosimetry. EPA/600.8-90/066F. 
  19. Flues M, Camargo IMC, Figueiredo Filho PM, Silva PSC and Mazzilli BP. 2007. Evaluation of radionuclides concentration in Brazilian coals. M. Flues. Fuel 86:807-812. 
  20. U.S. Department of Energy. 2009. Methods and Models of the Hanford Internal Dosimetry Program. PNNL-MA-860. PNNL15614, Rev.1. 
  21. Smith K, Crockett G, Oatway W, Harvey M and Mobbs S. 2018. The Radiological Impact of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation in the UK. ENA-NORM III Brussels. Session III: 3.5. 
  22. Robles B, Mora JC, Cancio D, Baeza A and Corbacho JA. 2008. Radiological investigation in the boiler's maintenance operations in a Coal Fired Power Plant. 12th International congress of the International Radiation Protection Association(IRPA).