DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Module level EMC verification method for replacement items in nuclear power plant

  • Received : 2022.09.18
  • Accepted : 2023.03.09
  • Published : 2023.07.25

Abstract

Internal replaceable electronic module substitutions can impact EMC (ElectroMagnetic Compatibility) qualification testing and results if EMC testing is conducted at the cabinet level. The impact of component substitutions on EMC qualification results therefore should be evaluated. If a qualitative evaluation is not adequate to ensure that the modified product will not impact the cabinet level EMC qualification results, a new qualification testing should be conducted. Component level retesting should be conducted under electromagnetically equivalent conditions with the cabinet level test. This paper analyzes the propagation of conducted susceptibility test waveforms in a representative cabinet and evaluates the impact of component substitutions on cabinet level EMC qualification results according to the location of the replacement items. A guideline for a qualitative evaluation of the impact of component substitutions is described based on the propagation of the conducted susceptibility test waveforms. A module level test method is also described based on an analysis of the shielding effectiveness of the cabinet.

Keywords

References

  1. U.S. NRC, Guidelines for evaluating electromagnetic and radio-frequency interference in safety-related instrumentation and control systems, regulatory guide 1.180, Rev 1 (2003). 
  2. M. O'Hara, An EMC design risk assessment technique to retest or not to retest?, in: 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC2.2003.1428210. Istanbul, Turkey, May 11-16. 
  3. Korea National Radio Research Agency, Notification about Conformity Assessment for Broadcasting and Communications Equipment and Etc, Notification of National Radio Research Agency, 2018, 2018-13. 
  4. A.C. Gehl, E.W. Hagen, Aging Assessment of Reactor Instrumentation and Protection System Components, U.S. NRC, 1992. NUREG/CR-5700. 
  5. K. Korsah, R.L. Clark, T.T. Wood, Functional Issues and Environmental Qualification of Digital Protection Systems of Advanced Light-Water Nuclear Reactors, U.S. NRC, 1994. NUREG/CR-5904. 
  6. S.W. Kercel, M.R. Moore, E.D. Blackeman, P.D. Ewing, R.T. Wood, Survey of Ambient Electromagnetic and Radio-Frequency Interference Levels in Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. NRC, 1996. NUREG/CR-6436. 
  7. Min Moon-Gi, Lee Jae-Ki, Ji Yeong-Haw, Jo Sung-Han, Kim Hee-Je, Evaluation of electromagnetic interference environment of the instrumentation and control systems in nuclear power unit, Nucl. Eng. Des. 285 (2015) 15-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.01.011. 
  8. P.D. Ewing, R.T. Wood, Recommended Electromagnetic Operating Envelopes for Safety-Related I&C Systems in Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. NRC, 1999. NUREG/CR-6431. 
  9. K. Korsah, T.J. Tanaka, T.L. Wilson Jr., R.T. Wood, Environmental Testing of an Experimental Digital Safety Channel, U.S. NRC, 1996. NUREG/CR-6406. 
  10. P.D. Ewing, R.T. Wood, in: Comparison of U.S.Military and International Electromagnetic Compatibility Guidance, U.S. NRC, 2003, p. 6782. NUREG/CR. 
  11. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Guidelines for electromagnetic compatibility testing of power plant equipment, TR-102323 rev5, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020359, 2019. 
  12. Hrvoje Grganic, Davor Grigic, Sinisa Sadek, Room Classification Based on EMC Conditions in Nuclear Power Plants, MDPI, energies, 2020. 
  13. C.L. Lowe, C.J. Kiger, In-situ electromagnetic immunity testing of nuclear power plant equipment, in: Proceedings of the 58th Annual ISA POWID Symposium, 2015. Kansas City, MO, USA, June 7-11. 
  14. C. Kiger, H. Grganic, In-situ electromagnetic and radio frequency interference testing of equipment in the main control room of the Krsko nuclear power plan, in: Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society 11th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC & HMIT), Orlando, FL, USA, 2019. February 9-14. 
  15. U.S. DOD, Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment, MIL-STD-461E, 1999. 
  16. IEC Std. 61000-4-12, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)-Part 4-12: Testing and Measurement Techniques, Section 12, Oscillatory Waves Immunity Tests, IEC, 1996. 
  17. IEC Std. 61000-4-5, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)-Part 4-5: Testing and Measurement Techniques, Section 5, Surge Immunity Test, IEC, 1995. 
  18. IEC Std. 61000-4-4, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)-Part 4-4: Testing and Measurement Techniques, Section 4, Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test, IEC, 1995. 
  19. Shielding effectiveness test report (radiometrics document RP-5760B). www.smcoenclosures.com.