문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제9권4호
  • /
  • Pages.1-11
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

토의 중심 교수학습 모형 개발

Development of a Discussion-Centered Teaching and Learning Model

  • 투고 : 2023.04.05
  • 심사 : 2023.05.10
  • 발행 : 2023.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 창의⸱융합형 인재 양성을 위하여 토의중심 교수학습 모형을 개발하는 데 있다. 연구 방법은 토의중심 교수학습 모형 초안을 구안하고 전문가의 타당성 검증을 통해 모형을 최종 완성하였다. 도출된 최종안으로 수업 적용 타당성을 검증하여 최종안을 수정 보완하였다. 토의중심 교수학습 모형 초안과 비교해 볼 때 최종 모형은 직소 토의를 제외하고 텍스트 읽기 강조, 질문 방법, 질문생성 전략에 중점을 둔 모형이 개발되었다. 본 연구에서 개발된 토의중심 교수학습 모형은 창의⸱융합형 인재 양성을 위한 교수자에게 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다. 토의중심 교수학습 모형을 현장에 효과적으로 적용하기 위한 제언으로 첫째, 토의 시 경청과 존중의 자세가 필요하며, 둘째, 토의에 참여하는 학습자들의 능동적인 참여를 어떻게 끌어낼 것인가? 방안을 생각해야 하며, 셋째, 토의 시간 관리의 중요성을 강조하였다.

The purpose of this study is to develop a discussion-centered teaching and learning model for nurturing creative and convergence talents. Regarding the research method, a draft model on discussion-centered teaching and learning was devised, and the model was completed through expert validation. The final draft was revised and supplemented by verifying how valid the model was when applied in class by using the derived final draft. Compared with the draft on discussion-centered teaching and learning model, the final model focused on text-reading emphasis, methods of questioning, and question generation strategies, excluding jigsaw discussions. The discussion-centered teaching and learning model developed in this study is expected to help instructors foster creative and convergence talents. Three suggestions have been provided to effectively apply this model to the field. First, an attitude of listening and respect is required during a discussion. Second, a plan should be considered on how to induce active participation of learners participating in the discussion. Third, the importance of managing discussion time was emphasized.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. O. H, Yoon, "Analysis of the Meaning of the 2022 Revised Curriculum", The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 59-69, 2022, https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2022.8.5.59.
  2. J. M. Lee, "A qualitative analysis of multiple cases on the applications of discussion methods to college classes", The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 447-475. 2012. uci: G704-001474.2012.24.2.009. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2012.24.2.447
  3. S. J. Lee, O. H. Yoon, "Effect of Applied Design Thinking Courses", Effect of Applied Design Thinking Courses, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 205-215, 2021. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2021.15.4.205
  4. J. H. Kim, "The Effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) on the Ability toParticipate in Field-Education Classes and Improvement of Problem-Solving Skills", The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), Vol. 9, No. (1), p. 1-9. 2023. https://doi.org.10.17703/JCCT.2023.9.1.1
  5. Y. Deval, J. Jesionkowska, & F. Wild,, "Active Learning Augmented Reality for STEAM Education; A Case Study," Education Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 198, pp.1-15, 2020. DOI 10.1063/5.0112204
  6. Y. C. L. Richard, "Applying online and blended learning structure to teaching practice for STEAM Education," 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp.1-5, 2020. DOI 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274147
  7. A. R. Hwang, J. L. Lee, "The Effect of the Flipped Learning on Grit, Learning Presence, and Learning Satisfaction of Nursing Students", International JOURNAL OF CONTENTS, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 656-666, 2022.
  8. S. Y. Jung, H. J. Choi, "Analysis of Interaction Patterns in Online Discussion Activities Based on the Principles of Israeli's Havruta", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 18, No. 10, pp. 351-373, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.10.351
  9. C. Allison, & O. Kent, "Three partners in study : two people and ate text," A Journal of Jewish Ideas, Vol. 42, No .6, pp.90-105. 2012.
  10. D. W. Johnson, & R. T. Johnson, "Critical thinking through structured controversy," Educational Leadership, Vol. 45, No. 8, pp.58-64, 1998.
  11. H. J. Park, "A Case Study on the Effects of Discussion Methodsin Teaching Profession Courses", Journal of Educational Innovation Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 139-161, 2018. DOI: 10.21024/pnuedi.28.2.201806.139.
  12. Ministry of Education, 2015 Revised Curriculum, Ministry of Education Notification No. 2015-74, Sejong: Ministry of Education, 2015.
  13. J. H. Park, S. H. Kim, "The Moderating Effects of Learning Strategies in the Influence of Active and Collaborative Learning on Critical Thinking and Cooperative Ability in the Interdisciplinary Courses", Korean Education Inquiry, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 127-152, 2020. DOI : 10.22327/kei.2020.38.3.127
  14. O. H. Yoon, "Applying a Teaching Method to Lessons to Improve Thinking Ability: A Case Study", The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 637-654, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2021.33.4.637
  15. Y. K. Baek, J. S. Park, Educational methods and educational technology in the ubiquitous era. Hakjisa, 2010.
  16. B. K. Kim, "A Study on the Structrual Principles Academaic Debate - A Centering on the Structured Plan of Debate Eduacation at University Utilizing Sookmyung Debate Model", Poetics & Linguistics, Vol. 22, pp.71-100. 2012.
  17. E. M. Ra, "Critical Review and Improvement Plan of Debate Educationin University - Targeting Debate Education as Liberal Education", Korean Speech and Discourse Analysis, Vol. 19, pp. 241-269, 2011. uci: G704-002013.2011..19.003 G704-002013.2011..19.003
  18. S. J. Park, "A Study on the Problem Solving Method of University Debate Education", language and literature, Vol. 104, pp. 27-56, 2009. uci: G704-000112.2009..104.004 G704-000112.2009..104.004
  19. B. Y. Kim, Y. N. Go, M. Shin, Habuta class design. Seoul: MaMed, 2019.
  20. S. S. Jeon, The best way to study Jewish Habuta's secret, Kyunghyang BP. 2015.
  21. S. Y. Kim, J. E. Park, NECA Systematic Review Manual. NECA Research Methods Series, pp.1-287, 2011.
  22. S. Y. Chang, J. J. Lee, "Development of a Team-Based Learning Design Model in Higher Education", Asian Journal of Education, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 271-302, 2015. uci: G704-000733.2015.16.1.015 https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2015.16.1.012
  23. R. C. Richey, & J. D. Kein, Design and Development Research. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 2007.
  24. M. Lynn,"Determination and quantification of content validity," Nursing Research, Vol. 35, pp. 382-38, 1996.
  25. C. H. Lawshe, "A quantitative approach to content validity," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.563-575, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  26. D. F. Polit, C. T. Beck, & S. V. Owen, "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations," Research in Nursing & Health, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 459-467, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  27. I. J. Ra, H. M. Jung, "Developing an Action Model for WBI Design", Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 27-52, 2001. DOI 10.17232/KSET.17.2.27
  28. E. M. Sung, J. E. Choi, M. K. Baek, "A Study on Development for Teaching and Learning Model of Online Project-Based Learning in Untact Context", The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 227-270, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2021.33.1.227
  29. N. S. Gang, Question Poor Society. Paju: Planetary Rain Co., Ltd. 2021.
  30. O. Kent, "A theory of Havruta learing," Journal of Jewish Education, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 215-245, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2010.501499