문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제9권4호
  • /
  • Pages.211-221
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학업성취도 평가를 통한 강의평가 타당성 제고 및 수업태도에 대한 보정을 통한 강의만족도 신뢰성 제고

Improving the Validity of Evaluation through Evaluating Academic Achievement and Enhancing the Reliability of Satisfaction of Teaching through Correction of In-class Attitude

  • 윤규원 (경상국립대학교 교육학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.05.15
  • 심사 : 2023.07.05
  • 발행 : 2023.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 강의평가의 대상에 학업성취도를 추가하여 평가의 타당성을 높이고, 수업태도에 대한 통제정당성을 검증하고 수업태도 보정지수를 개발하여 평가의 신뢰성을 높이기 위한 목적으로 실시하였다. 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 학생의 수업태도는 강의만족도에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다. 수업태도가 긍정적일수록 강의만족도가 높아지고, 수업태도가 부정적일수록 강의만족도가 낮아지는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 학생의 수업태도는 학업성취도에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다. 수업태도가 긍정적일수록 학업성취도가 높으며, 수업태도가 부정적일수록 학업성취도가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 강의만족도는 학업성취도에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 확인되었다. 강의만족도가 높다고 해서 강의품질이 높다고 할 수 없으며, 강의만족도가 낮다고 해서 강의품질이 낮다고 할 수 없다는 의미이다. 넷째, 수업태도로 인해 왜곡될 수 있는 강의만족도 결과를 보정하기 위한 강의만족도 보정지수를 개발하였다. 결론적으로 강의만족도외에 학업성취도를 평가대상으로 추가하여 강의평가의 타당성을 제고하고, 강의만족도 보정지수를 적용하여 강의평가의 신뢰성을 제고해야 한다.

The purpose of this study is to improve the validity of the evaluation by adding the factor of academic achievement to the subject of evaluation, and to improve the reliability of the evaluation by verifying the legitimacy of control of in-class attitude and developing the correction index of satisfaction of teaching. The results of the study are as follows. Firstly, it was confirmed that the students' in-class attitude had a significant effect on satisfaction of teaching. The more positive the in-class attitude, the higher the satisfaction of teaching, and vice versa. Secondly, it was confirmed that the students' in-class attitude had a significant effect on academic achievement. The more positive the in-class attitude, the higher the academic achievement, and vice versa. Thirdly, it was confirmed that satisfaction of teaching did not have a significant effect on academic achievement. High satisfaction of teaching does not mean that the quality of the teaching is high, and vice versa. Fourthly, the correction index of satisfaction of teaching was developed to correct the results of satisfaction of teaching that may be distorted due to the students' negative in-class attitude. In conclusion, academic achievement should be added as the subject of evaluation in addition to the satisfaction of teaching to improve the validity of evaluation and the correction index of satisfaction of teaching should be applied to improve the reliability of evaluation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. R. W. Tyler, "Basic principles of curriculum and instruction", Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1949,
  2. M. H. Kim, "Validity and Reliability of Lecture Evaluation", Asian Journal of Education, Vol. No. 3, pp 1-24, 2005.
  3. J. K. Kim, "Developing a Student Evaluation Instrument for College Teaching", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp 187-196, 2017.
  4. S. I. Han, H. J. Kim, J. Y. Lee, "A Comprehensive Study of Korean Students Evaluations of University Teaching", The Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp 379-403, 2005.
  5. R. W. Kim, "Evaluating the lecture evaluation of Seoul National University", Seoul National University Press, Apr. 10, 2022. http://www.snunews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=30614
  6. D. H. Choi, "Looking back on our university's lecture evaluation system", Postech Press, Sep. 14, 2022, http://times.postech.ac.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=22217
  7. C. H. Ryu, S. J. Lim, "A Study on the Appropriate Timing for the Compulsory University Lecture Evaluation: Focusing on the Case of University A", Korean Business Education Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp 31-50, 2022. https://doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2022.37.1.31
  8. Y. J. Yun, "A Study on the Variables Affecting the Evaluation of Lectures", Korean Journal of General Education, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp 185-210, 2018.
  9. D. E. Clayson, D. A. Haley, "Are Students Telling Us the Truth? A Critical Look at the Student Evaluation of Teaching", Marketing Education Review, Vol. 21, No, 2, pp 101-112, 2011 DOI.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008210201
  10. J. W. Kim. "73.5% of the respondents said, "It does not serve as a role of communication between professors and students."", Usline, Aug. 03, 2014, http://www.usline.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=2888
  11. J. B. Kim, "A Study on Influencing Factors of Instructor on Student Evaluation of Teaching", Journal of Consumption Culture, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp 161-179, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2017.20.4.008
  12. B. Uttl, C. A. White, & D. W. Gonzalez, "Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related", Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 54, pp 22-42, 2017. DOI.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
  13. J. A. Centra, "Reflective faculty evaluation", San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
  14. Y. H. Choi, R. Yun, "A Study on Developing and Validating the Lecture Evaluation Tool - Focusing on the H University case", Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp 25-49, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.26.1.025
  15. D. L. Kirkpatrick & J. D. Kirkpatrick, "Evaluating training programs: the four levels". California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006. 
  16. T. J. Seong, "Fundamentals of Education Evaluation (3rd Edition)", Seoul: Hakjisa, 2019. 
  17. S. G, Baek, H, J, Shin, "Multilevel Analysis of the Effects of Student and Course Characteristics on Student Course Evaluation - Focused on the Undergraduate Liberal Education Program -", Journal of Educational Evaluation, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp 1-24, 2008. 
  18. S. H. Lee, J. A. Ming, "Effective reaction evaluation in evaluating training programs. Purposes and dimension classification". Performance Improvement, Vol. 38, No. 8, pp 32-39, 1999.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140380808
  19. K. A. Feldman, "The superior college teacher from the students' view", Res High Educ, Vol. 5, pp 243-288, 1976. DOI.org/10.1007/BF00991967 
  20. H. W. Marsh, "Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility", Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp 707-754, 1984. DOI.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.707 
  21. C. A. Burdsal & J. W. Bardo, "Measuring Student's Perceptions of Teaching: Dimensions of Evaluation". Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp 63-79, 1986. DOI.org/10.1177/0013164486461006 
  22. S. H. Lee, "A Study for Instrument Development of Course Evaluation in the University Based Upon the Theory of Instructional Design", Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp 81-108, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.17.1.81
  23. G. S. Yang, "Meta-research on the influence of course, instructor, and student characteristics in student evaluation of teaching at universities", The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp 293-322, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2014.26.2.293
  24. E. J. Jung, J. D. Lee, "The Relationship between Students' Lecture Satisfaction, Positive Self Concept, and Class Attitude", The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp 447-465, 2016. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2016.33.2.447
  25. S. S. Cho, "A Case Study on the Effect of Student Characteristics among the Influential Factors in the Teaching Evaluation at Universities", Journal of Engineering Education Research, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp 38-43, 2016. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2016.19.6.38
  26. H. K. Wachtel, "Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: a brief review", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp 191-212, 1998. DOI.org/10.1080/0260293980230207
  27. P. Spooren, B. Brockx, & D. Mortelmans, "On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art", Review of Educational Research, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp 598-642, 2013. DOI.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
  28. G. H. Lee, "Can We Trust Students' Rating on Course in University?: Analysis on the Students' Ratings of A Professor's Same Courses", The Journal of Local Education Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp 1-20, 2018.
  29. S. Y. Oh, "The Study on Adjustment Method for Influence factor of Course Evaluation Score". Journal of Educational Evaluation, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp 1225-1254, 2015.
  30. H. W. Marsh & L. A. Roche, "Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility". American Psychologist, Vol. 52, No. 11, pp 1187-1197, 1997. DOI.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1187
  31. K. B. Moon, "The Study for problems of course evaluations in mathematics education", Communi cations of mathematical education, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp 909-922, 2010.