대한감각통합치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)

  • 제21권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-10
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1738-0405(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-115X(eISSN)
대한감각통합치료학회 (Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 감각처리와 성격의 관계

Relationship between Sensory Processing and Personality in College Students

  • 이춘엽 (가야대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 정남해 (동서대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Lee, Chunyeop (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kaya University) ;
  • Jung, Namhae (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Dongseo University)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.10
  • 심사 : 2023.06.22
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 대학생을 대상으로 성격 5요인을 사용하여 감각처리와 성격 간의 관련성을 알아보았다. 연구방법 : 본 연구는 2022년 10월부터 12월까지 보건관련 학과 대학생 149명을 대상으로 실시하였다. 감각처리는 청소년/성인 감각프로파일(Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile; AASP)로 평가하고, 성격은 성격 5요인(International Personality Item Pool; IPIP)으로 평가하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS를 이용하여 기술통계, 빈도분석, 피어슨상관분석을 실시하였다. 결과 : 외향성과 친화성 성격은 모든 감각처리 유형과 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 감각추구를 제외한 모든 감각처리 유형과 신경성 성격 간, 감각추구 유형과 개방성 성격 간에 양의 상관관계가 있었고, 성실성 성격과 등록저하 및 감각예민 유형 간에 음의 상관관계가 있었다(p<.01). 결론 : 대학생의 감각처리와 성격 5요인 평가를 통한 성격 간에 관련성이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 추후 대학생에게 나타나는 여러 문제의 해결방안을 모색하는 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Objective : This study aimed to identify the relationship between sensory processing and personality in college students by using five personality factors. Methods : The study was conducted between October and December 2022 with 149 college students majoring in health studies. Sensory processing was evaluated using the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP), and personality was evaluated using the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP). The data collected were analyzed by descriptive statistics, frequency analysis, and Pearson correlation analysis, and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used. Results : Extraversion and agreeableness showed a significant correlation with all sensory processing types. Neuroticism showed a positive correlation with all types of sensory processing other than sensory seeking, while openness to experience showed a positive correlation with sensory seeking. Conscientiousness showed a negative correlation with low registration and sensory sensitivity type (p<.01). Conclusion : This study found a relationship between sensory processing type and personality type through an evaluation of five personality in college students. This information can be used to find solutions to various problems that college students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ayres, A. J. (1979). Sensory integration and child. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. 
  2. Bodison, S. C., & Parham, L. D. (2018). Specific sensory techniques and sensory environmental modifications for children and youth with sensory integration difficulties: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 7201190040p1-7201190040p11. doi:10.5014/ajot.2018.029413 
  3. Brown, C., & Dunn, W. (2002). The adult sensory profile. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  4. Byun, K. H. (2009). A study of the factors that have an influence for college students from local campus to adapt themselves to campus life (Master's thesis). Konkuk University, Seoul. 
  5. Capsi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (1993). When do individual differences matter? A paradoxical theory of personality coherence. Psychological Inquiry, 4(4), 247-271. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0404_1 
  6. Cha, N. H. (2013). Learning ability and stress by character type in nursing college students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 14(12), 6257-6264. doi:10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.12.6257 
  7. Choi, E. S., Kim, Y. S., Baek, D. R., Hong, K. H., & Jung, H. R. (2015). The relationship between sensory processing feature and personality in early adolescents. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 23(4), 35-45. doi:10.14519/jksot.2015.23.4.03 
  8. Choi, J. D., Kim, J. K., & Lee, T. Y. (2010). Relationship between sensory processing styles and personality. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(1), 23-30. 
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated. 
  10. Crede, M., & Neihorster, S. (2012). Adjustment to college as measured by the student adaptation to college questionnaire: A quantitative review of its structure and relationships with correlates and consequences. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 133-165. 
  11. Dunn, W. (2014). Sensory profile 2 user's manual. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. 
  12. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press. 
  13. Ha, M. S. (2017). The relationship between big-five personality, emotional intelligence and leadership in female college students. Korean Education Inquiry, 35(2), 89-118. doi:10.22327/kei.2017.35.2.089 
  14. Han, S. J. (2018). The effect of the personality 5 traits of university students on the method of stress coping. Journal of Enneagram Studies, 15(2), 61-78. 
  15. Humphry, R. (2002). Young children's occupations: Explicating the dynamics of developmental processes. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(2), 171-179. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.2.171 
  16. Jeong, S. H., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10(3), 364-384. doi:10.1080/15213260701532948 
  17. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford. 
  18. Ju, J. S. (2021). Moderating effects of big 5 personality traits on the relations between helicopter parenting and college students' life satisfaction and school adjustment (Master's thesis). Chungbuk National University, Cheongju. 
  19. Jung, S. M., Choi, W. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, S. A., & Kang, E. Y. (2017). The correlation of sensory processing type, school record and self-esteem in the college student. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 11(6), 247-253. doi:10.21184/jkeia.2017.08.11.6.247 
  20. Kamath, M. S., Dahm, C. R., Tucker, J. R., Huang-Pollock, C. L., Etter, N. M., & Neely, K. A. (2020). Sensory profiles in adults with and without ADHD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 104, 103696. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103696 
  21. Kim, E. Y., Lee, S. W., Kim, Y., Lee, S. H., Kim, H. J., & Gwon, J. A. (2018). Psychometric characteristics of Korean version of life balance inventory (K-LBI) and relationship between life balance and sensory processing. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 16(2), 36-49. doi:10.18064/JKASI.2018.16.2.036 
  22. Kim, M. S., & Kim, T. R. (2001). A comparison of the sensory processing skills of typically developing children with developmental disability. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9(1), 1-10. 
  23. Kim, S. K., & Kim, E. Y. (2021). Effect of early childhood sensory processing on temperament and character traits. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 19(3), 13-21. doi:10.18064/JKASI.2021.19.3.13 
  24. Kim, S. K., Kang, C. M., Kwon, J. H., Kim, M. K., Kim, S. H., Cho, Y. J., & Kim, E. Y. (2022). Effect of sensory processing patterns on temperament and character traits in undergraduate students. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 20(3), 38-47. doi:10.18064/JKASI.2022.20.3.38 
  25. Koh, D. W. (2013). Tourism psychology. Seoul, Korea: Daewangsa. 
  26. Lee, G. C. (2015). Statistics for health care. Seoul, Korea: Hyunmoonsa. 
  27. Lee, H. I. (2014). Psychology and behavior of service customers. Seoul, Korea: Kimunsa. 
  28. Lee, K. A., Shin, H. L., Yoo, N. H., & Lee, K. H. (2008). The development and validation of the college adjustment inventory-short form. Korea Journal of Counseling, 9(2), 739-754. doi:10.15703/kjc.9.2.200806.739 
  29. Lee, S. H. (2015). The effect of sensory processing on social skills in school-age children with ADHD (Master's thesis). Gachon University, Seongnam. 
  30. LePine, J., Colquitt, J., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563-593. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x 
  31. Lim, K. O., & Choi, Y. T. (2013). Study on university students' personality types and stress management techniques and their effect on academic burnout: Based on the MBTI personality assessment. Journal of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 8(5), 785-790. doi:10.13067/JKIECS.2013.8.5.785 
  32. McAdams, D. P. (1992). The Five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 329-361. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x 
  33. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.81 
  34. Nam, J. H. (2014). The relations among the big five personality factors, the early maladaptive schema, and interpersonal competence of college students (Master's thesis). Daegu University, Kyungsan. 
  35. Neal, J. A., Edelman, R. F., & Glachan, M. (2002). Behavioural inhibition and symptoms of anxiety and depression: Is there a specific relationship with social phobia? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(4), 361-374. doi:10.1348/014466502760387489 
  36. Park, J. Y. (2019). Analysis of relationship between big-five personality factors and creativity convergence competency of undergraduate students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 20(8), 371-380. doi:10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.8.371 
  37. Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Vidovic, V., Saklofske, D. H., Stoeber, J., & Benoit, A. (2019). Perfectionism and the five-factor model of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 367-390. doi:10.1177/1088868318814973 
  38. Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., & Terracciano, A. (2018). Facets of conscientiousness and objective markers of health status. Psychology and Health, 33(9), 1100-1115. doi:10.1080/08870446.2018.1464165 
  39. Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2022). Agreeableness and its consequences: A quantitative review of meta-analytic findings. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(3), 242-280. doi:10.1177/10888683211073007 
  40. Woo, H. S., & Choi, Y. I. (2018). The effects of sensory processing types on the psychosocial factors of college students. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(9), 819-826. doi:10.21742/AJMAHS.2018.09.71 
  41. Yoo, T. Y., Lee, K. B., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the HEXACO personality inventory. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 18(3), 61-75. 
  42. Youk, E. H. (2022). The influence of game usage by genre on game addiction: Focusing on the moderating effect of sensory processing feature and interpersonal competence. Journal of Korea Game Society, 22(5), 115-128. doi:10.7583/JKGS.2022.22.5.115