Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surface structure characteristics of dental implants and their potential changes following installation: a literature review

  • Pitchaya Aneksomboonpol (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University) ;
  • Basel Mahardawi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University) ;
  • Pheeradej Na Nan (The Engineering Institute of Thailand under H.M. The King's Patronage) ;
  • Palawat Laoharungpisit (Department of General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University) ;
  • Thongnard Kumchai (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi University) ;
  • Natthamet Wongsirichat (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Bangkokthonburi University) ;
  • Napapa Aimjirakul (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University)
  • Received : 2022.08.10
  • Accepted : 2022.12.01
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dental implants have been utilized for many years to treat individuals with missing teeth. To optimize the long-term success rate of such implants, new designs, surfaces, and materials have been analyzed. It is important for the clinician to have a background in the field of implant surface design, to be familiar with the strengths and limitations of the available options, and to be aware of the alterations in surface structure that may occur following installation. This article provides a detailed review of the structure and the surface characteristics of dental implants, the modifications of implant surface, as well as the methods of evaluating implant surface structure. Moreover, it provides information concerning the structural changes that may take place at the time of dental implant placement. It is important for clinicians to be aware of such changes to plan and execute implant procedures with the highest possible success and implant survival rates.

Keywords

References

  1. De Bruyn H, Christiaens V, Doornewaard R, Jacobsson M, Cosyn J, Jacquet W, et al. Implant surface roughness and patient factors on long-term peri-implant bone loss. Periodontol 2000 2017;73:218-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12177
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4
  3. Berbel LO, Banczek EDP, Karoussis IK, Kotsakis GA, Costa I. Determinants of corrosion resistance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy dental implants in an in vitro model of peri-implant inflammation. PLoS One 2019;14:e0210530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210530
  4. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Ulrich H, Krol JJ. An optical three-dimensional technique for topographical descriptions of surgical implants. J Biomed Eng 1992;14:412-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(92)90087-2
  5. Guan H, van Staden RC, Johnson NW, Loo YC. Dynamic modelling and simulation of dental implant insertion process-a finite element study. Finite Elem Anal Des 2011;47:886-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.03.005
  6. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  7. Albrektsson T, Buser D, Chen ST, Cochran D, DeBruyn H, Jemt T, et al. Statements from the Estepona consensus meeting on periimplantitis, February 2-4, 2012. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:781-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12017
  8. Adler L, Liedholm E, Silvegren M, Modin C, Buhlin K, Jansson L. Patient satisfaction 8-14 years after dental implant therapy - a questionnaire study. Acta Odontol Scand 2016;74:423-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2016.1177661
  9. Testori T, Clauser C, Deflorian M, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Fabbro MD. A retrospective analysis of the effectiveness of the longevity protocol for assessing the risk of implant failure. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:1113-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12428
  10. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  11. Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20 Suppl 4:185-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x
  12. Terheyden H, Lang NP, Bierbaum S, Stadlinger B. Osseointegration--communication of cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1127-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02327.x
  13. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003;67:932-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x
  14. Glauser R, Schupbach P, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH. Periimplant soft tissue barrier at experimental one-piece mini-implants with different surface topography in humans: a light-microscopic overview and histometric analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S44-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00074.x
  15. Cochran D, Oates T, Morton D, Jones A, Buser D, Peters F. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface. J Periodontol 2007;78:974-82. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060294
  16. Schwartz Z, Nasazky E, Boyan BD. Surface microtopography regulates osteointegration: the role of implant surface microtopography in osteointegration. Alpha Omegan 2005;98:9-19.
  17. Jorge JR, Barao VA, Delben JA, Faverani LP, Queiroz TP, Assuncao WG. Titanium in dentistry: historical development, state of the art and future perspectives. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0190-1
  18. Penarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago M, Canullo L, Covani U, Penarrocha M. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate versus conventional loading with fixed full-arch prostheses in the maxilla: a nonrandomized controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:690-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3516
  19. Dharmayanti AWS, Dubey R, Dubey NK, Deng WP. Implant surface modification strategies through antibacterial and bioactive components. In: Pal K, Banerjee I, Sarkar P, Kim D, Deng WP, Dubey NK, et al., eds. Biopolymer-based formulations: biomedical and food applications. Elsevier; 2020:647-73.
  20. Bencharit S, Byrd WC, Hosseini B. Immediate placement of a porous-tantalum, trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implant with demineralized bone matrix into a socket with deficient buccal bone: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:262-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.022
  21. Andani MT, Shayesteh Moghaddam N, Haberland C, Dean D, Miller MJ, Elahinia M. Metals for bone implants. Part 1. Powder metallurgy and implant rendering. Acta Biomater 2014;10:4058-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.025
  22. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2--review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-64.
  23. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-43.
  24. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol 2010;28:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003
  25. Wennerberg A, Galli S, Albrektsson T. Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2011;3:59-67. https://doi.org/10.2147/cciden.s15949
  26. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Vazquez L, Park YJ, Sammartino G, Bernard JP. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces. J Oral Implantol 2011;37:525-42. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-11-00080
  27. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-44.
  28. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Rehbein D, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. Biomaterials 2004;25:1429-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.015
  29. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
  30. Barfeie A, Wilson J, Rees J. Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration. Br Dent J 2015;218:E9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.171
  31. Coelho PG, Jimbo R, Tovar N, Bonfante EA. Osseointegration: hierarchical designing encompassing the macrometer, micrometer, and nanometer length scales. Dent Mater 2015;31:37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.007
  32. Kligman S, Ren Z, Chung CH, Perillo MA, Chang YC, Koo H, et al. The impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration and biofilm formation. J Clin Med 2021;10:1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081641
  33. Franchi M, Bacchelli B, Martini D, Pasquale VD, Orsini E, Ottani V, et al. Early detachment of titanium particles from various different surfaces of endosseous dental implants. Biomaterials 2004;25:2239-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.017
  34. Rodriguez y Baena R, Arciola CR, Selan L, Battaglia R, Imbriani M, Rizzo S, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion on machined titanium, Osseotite® and Nanotite® discs. Int J Artif Organs 2012;35:754-61. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000143
  35. Nevins M, Kim DM, Jun SH, Guze K, Schupbach P, Nevins ML. Histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to laser microgrooved abutments: a canine study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:245-55.
  36. Zechner W, Tangl S, Furst G, Tepper G, Thams U, Mailath G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:150-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x
  37. Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, et al. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:6285620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6285620
  38. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NR, Cardaropoli G, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:579-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31264
  39. Kim HG, Yun PY, Kim YK, Kim IH. Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;47:175-82. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.3.175
  40. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. An animal study of c.p. titanium screws with different surface topographies. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995;6:302-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120275
  41. Wennerberg A, Ohlsson R, Rosen BG, Andersson B. Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques. Med Eng Phys 1996;18:548-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4533(95)00005-4
  42. Baro AM, Garcia N, Miranda R, Vazquez L, Aparicio C, Olive J, et al. Characterization of surface roughness in titanium dental implants measured with scanning tunnelling microscopy at atmospheric pressure. Biomaterials 1986;7:463-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(86)90036-0
  43. Wieland M, Textor M, Spencer ND, Brunette DM. Wavelength-dependent roughness: a quantitative approach to characterizing the topography of rough titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:163-81.
  44. Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, Cai Y, Berner S, Tannenbaum R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 2011;32:3395-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029
  45. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;85:496-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500603
  46. Linkow L, Chercheve R. Theories and techniques of oral implant-logy. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 1970:1.
  47. Adell R. Tissue integrated prostheses in clinical dentistry. Int Dent J 1985;35:259-65.
  48. Misch CE. Bone character: second vital implant criterion. Dent Today 1988;7:39-40.
  49. Choi YJ, Jun SH, Song YD, Chang MW, Kwon JJ. CT scanning and dental implant. In: Subburaj K, ed. CT scanning - techniques and applications. IntechOpen; 2011.
  50. Seriwatanachai D, Kiattavorncharoen S, Suriyan N, Boonsiriseth K, Wongsirichat N. Reference and techniques used in alveolar bone classification. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci 2015;3:172.
  51. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health 2008;8:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-8-32
  52. Checa S, Prendergast PJ. Effect of cell seeding and mechanical loading on vascularization and tissue formation inside a scaffold: a mechano-biological model using a lattice approach to simulate cell activity. J Biomech 2010;43:961-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.044
  53. Alam K, Qamar SZ, Iqbal M, Piya S, Al-Kindi M, Qureshi A, et al. Effect of drill quality on biological damage in bone drilling. Sci Rep 2023;13:6234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33381-y
  54. Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Giro G, Janal MN, Coelho PG. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:113-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x
  55. Neugebauer J, Traini T, Thams U, Piattelli A, Zoller JE. Periimplant bone organization under immediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analyses: a minipig study. J Periodontol 2006;77:152-60. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.040360
  56. Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, Ogawa T, Quirynen M, Vandamme K, et al. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:877-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x
  57. Rosa MB, Albrektsson T, Francischone CE, Filho HO, Wennerberg A. Micrometric characterization of the implant surfaces from the five largest companies in Brazil, the second largest worldwide implant market. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:358-65. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2791
  58. Rodrigo D, Aracil L, Martin C, Sanz M. Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective case series study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01820.x
  59. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01823.x
  60. Mints D, Elias C, Funkenbusch P, Meirelles L. Integrity of implant surface modifications after insertion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:97-104. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3259
  61. Senna P, Antoninha Del Bel Cury A, Kates S, Meirelles L. Surface damage on dental implants with release of loose particles after insertion into bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:681-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12167
  62. Robert-Perron E, Blais C, Thomas Y, Pelletier S, Dionne M. An integrated approach to the characterization of powder metallurgy components performance during green machining. Mater Sci Eng A 2005;402:325-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.019
  63. Meyer U, Buhner M, Buchter A, Kruse-Losler B, Stamm T, Wiesmann HP. Fast element mapping of titanium wear around implants of different surface structures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:206-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01184.x
  64. Flatebo RS, Johannessen AC, Gronningsaeter AG, Boe OE, Gjerdet NR, Grung B, et al. Host response to titanium dental implant placement evaluated in a human oral model. J Periodontol 2006;77:1201-10. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050406
  65. Salerno M, Itri A, Frezzato M, Rebaudi A. Surface microstructure of dental implants before and after insertion: an in vitro study by means of scanning probe microscopy. Implant Dent 2015;24:248-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000244