References
- Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Am J Cancer Res 2023;13:1148-54.
- Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science 2023;379:313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
- Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature 2023;613:620-1. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
- Gaggioli A. Ethics: disclose use of AI in scientific manuscripts. Nature 2023;614:413. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00381-x
- Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature 2023;613:612. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
- Kung TH, Cheatham M, ChatGPT, Medenilla A, Sillos C, De Leon L, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for ai-assisted medical education using large language models. medRxiv 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643 [Epub ahead of print]
- O'Connor S. Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Educ Pract 2023;66:103537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537
- ChatGPT Generative Pre-trained Transformer; Zhavoronkov A. Rapamycin in the context of Pascal's Wager: generative pre-trained transformer perspective. Oncoscience 2022;9:82-4. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.571
- GPT Generative Pretrained Transformer, Osmanovic-Thunstrom A, Steingrimsson S. Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input? HAL 2022. https://hal.science/hal-03701250 [Epub ahead of print]