Journal of Trauma and Injury

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.78-86
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2799-4317(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1683(eISSN)
대한외상학회 (The Korean Society of Traumatology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality monitoring of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta using cumulative sum analysis in Korea: a case series

  • Hyunsik Choi (Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital) ;
  • Joongsuck Kim (Department of Trauma Surgery, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital) ;
  • Kwanghee Yeo (Department of Trauma Surgery, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital) ;
  • Ohsang Kwon (Department of Trauma Surgery, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital) ;
  • Kyounghwan Kim (Department of Trauma Surgery, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital) ;
  • Wu Seong Kang (Department of Trauma Surgery, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.06
  • 심사 : 2022.11.30
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a state-of-the-art lifesaving procedure. However, due to its high mortality and morbidity, including ischemia and reperfusion injury, well-trained medical staff and effective systems are needed. This study was conducted to investigate the learning curve for REBOA in Korea. Methods: To monitor this learning curve, we used cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis and graphs of mortality and aortic occlusion time within 60, 90, and 120 minutes for consecutive patients. The procedures performed between July 2017 and June 2021 were divided into pre-trauma center (pre-TC; July 2017-February 2020) and TC (February 2020-June 2021) periods. Results: REBOA was performed for 31 consecutive patients with trauma. The pre-TC (n=12) and TC (n=19) periods did not differ significantly with regard to Injury Severity Score, age, injury mechanism, initial systolic blood pressure, prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), or CPR in the emergency department. At the 17th consecutive patient during the TC period, CUSUM failure graphs for mortality and aortic occlusion time exhibited a downward inflection, indicating an improvement in performance. Conclusions: The mortality and aortic occlusion time of REBOA improved, and these parameters can be monitored using CUSUM analysis at the hospital level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cannon JW, Khan MA, Raja AS, et al. Damage control resuscitation in patients with severe traumatic hemorrhage: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017;82:605-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001333
  2. Khalid S, Khatri M, Siddiqui MS, Ahmed J. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta versus aortic cross-clamping by thoracotomy for noncompressible torso hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2022;270:252-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.016
  3. Borger van der Burg BL, van Dongen TT, Morrison JJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of major exsanguination. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018;44:535-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0959-y
  4. Brenner M, Bulger EM, Perina DG, et al. Joint statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) regarding the clinical use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2018;3:e000154.
  5. Liu A, Nguyen J, Ehrlich H, et al. Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy for civilian thoracic trauma in the field and emergency department settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2022;273:44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.11.012
  6. Castellini G, Gianola S, Biffi A, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with major trauma and uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg 2021;16:41.
  7. Linderman GC, Lin W, Becher RD, et al. Increased mortality with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta only mitigated by strong unmeasured confounding: an expanded analysis using the national trauma data bank. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021;91:790-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003265
  8. Gorman E, Nowak B, Klein M, et al. High resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta procedural volume is associated with improved outcomes: an analysis of the AORTA registry. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021;91:781-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003201
  9. Kang WS, Jo YG, Park YC. Quality improvement of damage control laparotomy: impact of the establishment of a single Korean regional trauma center. World J Surg 2019;43:2814-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05083-y
  10. Noyez L. Cumulative sum analysis: a simple and practical tool for monitoring and auditing clinical performance. Health Care Curr Rev 2014;2:113.
  11. Kim CH, Kim HJ, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Learning curve of laparoscopic low anterior resection in terms of local recurrence. J Surg Oncol 2014;110:989-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23757
  12. Joseph B, Zeeshan M, Sakran JV, et al. Nationwide analysis of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in civilian trauma. JAMA Surg 2019;154:500-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0096
  13. Samuels JM, Sun K, Moore EE, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: interest is widespread but need for training persists. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020;89:e112-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002855
  14. Sperandei S. Understanding logistic regression analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:12-8. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.003