The Korean Journal of Pain

  • 제36권3호
  • /
  • Pages.269-271
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2005-9159(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-0569(eISSN)
대한통증학회 (The Korean Pain Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

P value, it is just not enough

  • Boohwi Hong (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.06.07
  • 심사 : 2023.06.12
  • 발행 : 2023.07.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c332. 
  2. Govil N, Parag K, Arora P, Khandelwal H, Singh A; Ruchi. Perioperative duloxetine as part of a multimodal analgesia regime reduces postoperative pain in lumbar canal stenosis surgery: a randomized, triple blind, and placebo-controlled trial. Korean J Pain 2020; 33: 40-7.  https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.40
  3. Jeong H, Choi JW, Sim WS, Kim DK, Bang YJ, Park S, et al. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for pain management after gastrectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. Korean J Pain 2022; 35: 303-10.  https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.3.303
  4. Lee GY, Lee JW, Lee E, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Shin HI, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of epidural steroid injection using a nonparticulate steroid, dexamethasone or betamethasone: a double-blind, randomized, crossover, clinical trial. Korean J Pain 2022; 35: 336-44.  https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.3.336
  5. Hadjipavlou G, Siviter R, Feix B. What is the true worth of a P-value? Time for a change. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 564-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.042
  6. Chuang Z, Martin J, Shapiro J, Nguyen D, Neocleous P, Jones PM. Minimum false-positive risk of primary outcomes and impact of reducing nominal P-value threshold from 0.05 to 0.005 in anaesthesiology randomised clinical trials: a cross-sectional study. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130: 412-20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.11.001
  7. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 2016; 70: 129-33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
  8. Lee DK. Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Korean J Anesthesiol 2016; 69: 555-62.  https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555
  9. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 2012; 4: 279-82.  https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
  10. Lee S. Avoiding negative reviewer comments: common statistical errors in anesthesia journals. Korean J Anesthesiol 2016; 69: 219-26.  https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.3.219
  11. Munoz-Leyva F, El-Boghdadly K, Chan V. Is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in acute pain a good measure of analgesic efficacy in regional anesthesia? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45: 1000-5.  https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101670
  12. Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Boyd D, Chew C, MacDonald N, et al. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 424-9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew466
  13. Park S. Significant results: statistical or clinical? Korean J Anesthesiol 2016; 69: 121-5. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.121