Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy (한국수소및신에너지학회논문집)

The Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society (한국수소및신에너지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Economic Comparison of Various Turquoise Hydrogen Production Processes

다양한 청록수소 생산 공정에 대한 경제성 분석

  • SOOYONG LEE (Department of Energy Engineering, Korea Institute of Energy Technology (KENTECH)) ;
  • VAN-TIEN GIAP (Department of Zero-carbon Fuel and Power Generation, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials) ;
  • MUJAHID NASEEM (Department of Energy Engineering, Korea Institute of Energy Technology (KENTECH)) ;
  • JONGHWAN KIM (Department of Energy Engineering, Korea Institute of Energy Technology (KENTECH)) ;
  • YOUNG DUK LEE (Department of Energy Engineering, Korea Institute of Energy Technology (KENTECH))
  • 이수용 (한국에너지공과대학교 에너지공학부) ;
  • 잡반티엔 (한국기계연구원 무탄소연료발전연구실) ;
  • 무자히드 나심 (한국에너지공과대학교 에너지공학부) ;
  • 김종환 (한국에너지공과대학교 에너지공학부) ;
  • 이영덕 (한국에너지공과대학교 에너지공학부)
  • Received : 2023.05.22
  • Accepted : 2023.06.07
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Hydrogen production can be classified based on the energy source, primary reactor type, and whether or not it emits carbon dioxide. Utilizing color representation proves to be an effective means of expressing these distinctive characteristics. Among the various clean hydrogen production techniques, there has been a growing interest in turquoise hydrogen production, which involves the decomposition of methane or other fossil fuels. This method offers advantages in terms of large-scale production and cost reduction through the sale of solid-carbon byproduct. In this study, an extensive literature review was conducted to select and analyze several promising candidates for turquoise hydrogen production processes. The efficiency and economics of these processes were evaluated using stream data reported in the literature sources. The findings indicate that the levelized cost of hydrogen production (LCOH) is significantly influenced by the sales of byproducts, specifically the solid-carbon and carbon monoxide byproducts.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국전력공사의 사외공모 기초연구(과제번호: R22XO02-12)와 산업통상자원부 한국에너지기술평가원(과제번호: 20213030020280)의 연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. United Nations (UN), "What is Kyoto protocool?" UN. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol?gclid=.
  2. R. Rapier, "Life cycle emissions of hydrogen", Climate, 2020. Retrieved from https://4thgeneration.energy/life-cycles-emissions-of-hydrogen/.
  3. Internationale Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), "Global renewables outlook: energy transformation 2050", IRENA, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Global-Renewables-Outlook-2020.
  4. D. Lee, T. P. Israel, Y. Bae, Y. Kim, K. Ahm, and S. Lee, "Analysis of levelized cost of electricity for type of stationary fuel-cells", Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2022, pp. 643-659, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2022.33.6.643.
  5. International Energy Agency (IEA), "The future of hydrogen", IEA, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/thefuture-of-hydrogen.
  6. J. Castigliego and T. Stasio, "The "Colors" of Hydrogen", Applied Economics Clinic, 2021. Retrieved from https://aeclinic.org/aec-blog/2021/6/24/the-colors-of-hydrogen.
  7. J. Diab, L. Fulcheri, V. Hessel, V. Rohani, and M. Frenklach, "Why turquoise hydrogen will be a game changer for the energy transition", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 47, No. 61, 2022, pp. 25831-25848, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.299.
  8. A. Frangoul, "There's a buzz about green hydrogen. But pink, produced using nuclear, may have a huge role to play too", CNBC, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/03/why-pink-hydrogen-produced-using-nuclear-mayhave-a-big-role-to-play.html.
  9. K. Lee, W. Nam, G. Han, K. J. Yoon, and B. G. Lee,"Production of hydrogen by the pyrolysis of methane over carbon in the fluidized bed", Theories and Applications of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2022, pp. 3881-3884. Retrieved from https://www.cheric.org/proceeding_disk/kiche2002f/DP022.PDF.
  10. Y. H. Yoon, N. K. Park, J. D. Lee, T. J. Lee, W. C. Chang, B. G. Lee, and B. S. Ahn, "Hydrogen and carbon black production by pyrolysis of natural gas", Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2023, pp. 105-113. Retrieved from https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200330360540547.pdf.
  11. D. Lee, Y. Kim, and K. Ahn, "Analysis of methane conversion rate and selectivity of methane pyrolysis reaction in ceramic tube according to temperature and reaction time", Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2022, pp. 1-7, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2022.33.1.1.
  12. J. S. Hong, S. C. Kang, S. Y. Park, J. U. Lee, J. S. Im, Y. P. Jeon, J. Y. Hong, and C. W. Lee, "Trends in technology of hydrogen and carbon production by thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane", Korean Industrial Chemistry News, Vol.23, No.4, 2020, pp. 37-47. Retrieved from https://www.cheric.org/research/tech/periodicals/view.php?seq=1818076.
  13. D. C. Upham, V. Agarwal, A. Khechfe, Z. R. Snodgrass, M, J. Gordon, H. Metiu, and E. W. McFarland, "Catalytic molten metals for the direct conversion of methane to hydrogen and separable carbon", Science, Vol. 358, No. 6365, 2017, pp. 917-921, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao5023.
  14. U. Sikander, S. Sufian, K. Z. KuShaari, and F. K. Chong, "Effects of catalytic bed position on hydrogen production by methane decomposition", Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2018, pp. 3313-3320, doi: https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.12.1.2018.3.0297.
  15. T. Keipi, H. Tolvanen, and J. Konttinen, "Economic analysis of hydrogen production by methane thermal decomposition: Comparison to competing technologies", Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 159, 2018, pp. 264-273, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.063.
  16. T. Keipi, V. Hankalin, J. Nummelin, and R. Raiko, "Techno-economic analysis of four concepts for thermal decomposition of methane: reduction of CO2 emissions in natural gas combustion", Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 110, 2016, pp. 1-12, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.057.
  17. M. E. Tabat, F. O. Omoarukhe, F. Gulec, D. E. Adeniyi, A. Mukherjee, P. U. Okoye, C. C. Ogbaga, E. I. Epelle, O. Akande, and J. A. Okolie, "Process design, exergy, and economic assessment of a conceptual mobile autothermal methane pyrolysis unit for onsite hydrogen production", Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 278, 2023, pp. 116707, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116707.
  18. S. Schneider, S. Bajohr, F. Graf, and T. Kolb, "State of the art of hydrogen production via pyrolysis of natural gas", ChemBioEng Reviews, Vol. 7, No. 5, 2020, pp. 150-158, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202000014.
  19. T. Bui, Y. S. Kim, D. K. Lee, K. Y. Ahn, Y. Bae, and S. M. Lee, "Economic analysis and comparison between low-power and high-power SOEC systems", Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2022, pp. 707-714, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2022.33.6.707.
  20. S. S. Aji, Y. S. Kim, K. Y. Ahn, and Y. D. Lee, "Life-cycle cost minimization of gas turbine power cycles for distributed power generation using sequential quadratic programming method", Energies, Vol. 11, No. 12, 2018, pp. 3511, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123511.
  21. A. Bejan, G. Tsatsaronis, and M. J. Moran, "Thermal design and optimization", John Wiley & Sons, USA, 1995.
  22. IEA, "Key World Energy Statistics 2021", IEA, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2021.
  23. Korea Power Exchange, "Unit prices for different sources", Electric Power Statistics Information System, 2023. Retrieved from https://epsis.kpx.or.kr/epsisnew/selectEkmaUpsBftChart.do?menuId=040701.
  24. H. M. Kvamsdal, K. Jordal, and O. Bolland, "A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture", Energy, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007, pp. 10-24, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.02.006.