여성건강간호학회지 (Women's Health Nursing)

  • 제29권2호
  • /
  • Pages.85-90
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 3022-7666(pISSN)
  • /
  • 3022-8247(eISSN)
한국여성건강간호학회 (Korean Society of Women Health Nursing)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implementing alternative estimation methods to test the construct validity of Likert-scale instruments

  • Chang Gi Park (Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago)
  • 투고 : 2023.06.11
  • 심사 : 2023.06.14
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kiwanuka F, Kopra J, Sak-Dankosky N, Nanyonga RC, Kvist T. Polychoric correlation with ordinal data in nursing research. Nurs Res. 2022;71(6):469-476. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000614
  2. Brauer K, Ranger J, Ziegler M. Confirmatory factor analyses in psychological test adaptation and development: a nontechnical discussion of the WLSMV estimator. Psychol Test Adapt Dev. 2023;4(1):4-12. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000034
  3. Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PE, Savalei V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(3):354-373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
  4. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006.
  5. Bentler PM, Chou C. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res. 1987;16(1):78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
  6. Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: a second course. Charlotte, NC; IAP Information Age Publishing: 2013. p. 439-492.
  7. Dolan CV. Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5 and 7 response categories: a comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. Br J Stat Psychol. 1994;47(2):309-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1994.tb01039.x
  8. Tarka P. The comparison of estimation methods on the parameter estimates and fit indices in SEM model under 7-point Likert scale. Arch Data Sci. 2017;2(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000058749/10
  9. Beauducel A, Herzberg PY. On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Struct Equ Modeling. 2006;13(2):186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
  10. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004;9(4):466-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
  11. Muthen BO, du Toit SH, Spisic D. Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Technical report, UCLA; 1997. Retrieved from: http://gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article_075.pdf
  12. Tluczek A, Henriques JB, Brown RL. Support for the reliability and validity of a six-item state anxiety scale derived from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(1):19-28. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.17.1.19
  13. Barbaranelli C, Lee CS, Vellone E, Riegel B. Dimensionality and reliability of the self-care of heart failure index scales: further evidence from confirmatory factor analysis. Res Nurs Health. 2014;37(6):524-537. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21623
  14. Barbaranelli C, Lee CS, Vellone E, Riegel B. The problem with Cronbach's alpha: comment on Sijtsma and van der Ark (2015). Nurs Res. 2015;64(2):140-145. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079
  15. Liu W, Johantgen M, Newhouse R. Shared vision among acute care Magnet® hospital nurses: ordinal confirmatory factor analysis. West J Nurs Res. 2017;39(2):305-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945916651835
  16. Bratt C, Gautun H. Should I stay or should I go? Nurses' wishes to leave nursing homes and home nursing. J Nurs Manag. 2018;26(8):1074-1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12639
  17. Kim MJ, McKenna H, Park CG, Ketefian S, Park SH, Galvin K, et al. Global assessment instrument for quality of nursing doctoral education with a research focus: validity and reliability study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;91:104475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104475
  18. Zaghini F, Fiorini J, Piredda M, Fida R, Sili A. The relationship between nurse managers' leadership style and patients' perception of the quality of the care provided by nurses: cross sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;101:103446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103446
  19. Johnson K, McBee M, Reiss J, Livingood W, Wood D. TRAQ changes: improving the measurement of transition readiness by the transition readiness assessment questionnaire. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;59:188-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.04.019
  20. Sanso N, Vidal-Blanco G, Galiana L. Development and validation of the Brief Nursing Stress Scale (BNSS) in a sample of end-of-life care nurses. Nurs Rep. 2021;11(2):311-319. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep11020030
  21. Tehranineshat B, Rakhshan M, Torabizadeh C, Fararouei M, Gillespie M. Development and assessment of the psychometric properties of a compassionate care questionnaire for nurses. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00691-3
  22. Lee SL, Wu LM, Chou YY, Lai FC, Lin SY. Developing the Chinese version problem areas in diabetes-teen for measuring diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Nurs. 2022;64:143-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.02.011
  23. Yang Y, Wang P, Kelifa MO, Wang B, Liu M, Lu L, et al. How workplace violence correlates turnover intention among Chinese health care workers in COVID-19 context: The mediating role of perceived social support and mental health. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(6):1407-1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13325
  24. Aliri J, Prego-Jimenez S, Goni-Balentziaga O, Pereda-Pereda E, Perez-Tejada J, Labaka Etxeberria A. Gender awareness is also nurses' business: measuring sensitivity and role ideology towards patients. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(8):4409-4418. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13866
  25. Newsom JT. Psy 523/623 Structural equation modeling: summary of minimum sample size recommendations [Internet]. Spring, 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 10]. Available from: https://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/semclass/ho_sample%20size.pdf
  26. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2019;48(2):1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  27. Xia Y, Yang Y. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: the story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behav Res Methods. 2019;51(1):409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
  28. Shi D, Maydeu-Olivares A. The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educ Psychol Meas. 2020;80(3):421-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164
  29. Savalei V. Improving fit indices in structural equation modeling with categorical data. Multivariate Behav Res. 2021;56(3):390-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1717922
  30. Mansour M, Hasan AA, Alafafsheh A. Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Irish Assertiveness Scale among Saudi undergraduate nursing students and interns. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255159. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255159
  31. Zumbo BD, Gadermann AM, Zeisser C. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2007;6(1):21-29. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180