The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems (한국ITS학회 논문지)

The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems (한국ITS학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Improving Minimum Level of Service for Public Transportation Using Altteul Transport Card Data

알뜰교통카드를 활용한 대중교통 최소서비스 수준 분석 기준 개선 방안 연구

  • Sangwoo Shim (Korea Transportation Safety Authority) ;
  • Junyoung Joung (Korea Transportation Safety Authority) ;
  • Kwankyo Oh (Korea Transportation Safety Authority) ;
  • Minseok Kim (Korea Transportation Safety Authority)
  • 심상우 (한국교통안전공단 교통조사평가처) ;
  • 정준영 (한국교통안전공단 교통조사평가처) ;
  • 오관교 (한국교통안전공단 교통조사평가처) ;
  • 김민석 (한국교통안전공단 교통빅데이터센터)
  • Received : 2022.10.20
  • Accepted : 2022.12.27
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

User-centered public transportation services such as DRT, Autonomous Transit etc. have been provied but current minimum level of service for public transportation has been evaluated by the operator because there is no data on user's accessibility to use public transportation. This study was performed GRID analysis using altteul transport card data including user's accessibility to use public transportation. The analysis result showed that user's accessibility to use public transportation was different within a same dong area. We proposed improving minimum level of service for public transportation considered by the user. The result of applying the proposed method showed that many area was changed to unsatisfied area for minimum level of service for public transportation

수요대응 교통수단 및 자율주행 대중교통서비스 등 이용자 중심의 대중교통서비스가 제공되고 있으나 수요대응 교통수단의 도입 기준인 대중교통 최소서비스 수준은 이용자의 대중교통 접근성을 확인할 수 있는 자료의 부재로 운영자 중심으로 평가되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이용자의 대중교통 접근성을 파악할 수 있는 알뜰교통카드 데이터를 기반으로 법정동보다 작은 GRID 분석을 통해 동일 법정동 내에서도 대중교통 접근성이 차이가 있음을 확인하였고, 이를 기반으로 이용자 중심의 대중교통 최소서비스 수준 개선 방안을 제안하였다. 제안한 방식을 적용한 결과 현재 대중교통 최소서비스 수준에서는 확보 지역인 많은 법정동이 비확보 지역으로 분석되었다. 그러나 알뜰교통카드 데이터의 접근 시간은 이동 시간과 대기 시간을 포함하고 있으므로 확보 여부 판단 기준에 대한 추가적인 검토가 필요하다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원의 지원으로 수행되었음(과제번호 22AMDP-C161756-02).

References

  1. Daejeon Sejong Research Institute(2022), Analysis of Operation Patterns and Issue Derivation of Demand Responsive Transport 'Shucle', pp.26-38.
  2. Greene-Roesel, R., Diogenes, M. C. and Ragland, D. R.(2007), Estimating Pedestrian Accident Exposure: Protocol Report, Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Berkeley, p.15.
  3. Jjan, S., Andreas, B., Philipp, R. and Moritz, K.(2020), "Impact assessment of autonomous demand responsive transport as a link between urban and rural areas", Research in Transportation Business & Management, p.10.
  4. Korea Transportation Research Institute(2013), A study on the Establishment and Measurement Methodology of Minimum Service Standards for the Guarantee of Traffic Rights, pp.120-121.
  5. Land Transport Guru, https://landtransportguru.net/quality-of-service-qos-standards, 2023.03.31.
  6. Lim, S. H., Jang, W. J., Tak, S. H. and Park, T. Y.(2018), Strategies of Public Transportation Service in the Era of Autonomous Vehicle and Shared Transport, The Korea Transport Institute Basic Research Reports, pp.108-126.
  7. Mauro, S., Federico, R., Maximilian, S. and Marco, P.(2018), "On the interaction between autonomous mobility-on-demand and public transportation systems", 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, p.7.
  8. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2017), Passenger Transport Service Act, Article 3.
  9. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2022a), 4th Public Transportation Master Plan, pp.45, 74-75.
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2022b), Final Report of the 2021 Public Transportation Facility and Mean, pp.89-147.
  11. Oh, K. K., Kim, M. S., Joung, J. Y. and Park, S. Y.(2020), "Analysis of First-Last Mile Travel Characteristics Using al-card Data", Transportation Technology and Policy, vol. 17, no. 5, pp.17-24.
  12. Oregon Public Transportation Plan(2020), "Public Transportation Level of Service", Final White Paper, pp.72-76.
  13. Roland Berger, https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/Autonomus-driving-gains-traction-in-rural-areas.html, 2023.03.31.
  14. Seo, Y. H., Kwon, Y. M. and Kim, H. J.(2021), "A Framework for Selecting Vulnerable Areas to Provide Autonomous Public Transportation: A Case Study of Gyeonggi Province in South Korea", Journal of Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport System, vol. 2021, no. 4, pp.541-545.
  15. Tak, S. H., Kim, H. G., Kang, K. P. and Lee, D. H.(2019), "A study on the Introduction for Automated Vehicle-based Mobility Service Considering the Level of Service of Rode Infrastructure", Journal of Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport System, vol. 18, no. 5, pp.19-33. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2019.18.5.19
  16. Todd, L.(2021), Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, p.33.
  17. Transportation Research Board(2013), Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (3rd ed.), pp.11-16.
  18. Vale of Glamorgan Council(2005), Local Transport Plan, pp.28-29.
  19. Yoon, T. G.(2020), "Strategies to Implement Autonomous Public Transit", Transportation Technology and Policy, vol. 17, no. 2, pp.72-76.