DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Low-Molecular-Weight Collagen from Korean Native Chicken Feet Hydrolyzed Using Alcalase

  • Heedong Woo (SCM Division, ASK COMPANY) ;
  • Gyeong A Jeong (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Hyunwook Choi (Department of Functional Food and Biotechnology, Jeonju University) ;
  • Chang Joo Lee (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.28
  • 심사 : 2023.01.12
  • 발행 : 2023.05.28

초록

The aims of this study were to optimize the preparation of low-molecular-weight collagen using a proteolytic enzyme (alcalase) derived from the feet of Korean native chickens, and to characterize the process of collagen hydrolysis. Foreign bodies from chicken feet were removed using ultrasonication at 28 kHz with 1.36 kW for more than 25 min. The hydrolytic pattern and molecular weight distribution of enzyme-treated collagen from chicken feet were analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively. Ideally, chicken feet should be treated at 100℃ for 8 h to obtain a high collagen content using hot water extraction. The collagen content of the chicken foot extract was 13.9 g/100 g, and the proportion of low-molecular-weight collagen increased with increasing proteolytic enzyme concentration and reaction time. When treated with 1% alcalase, the average molecular weight of collagen decreased rapidly to 4,929 Da within 5 h and thereafter decreased at a slower rate, reaching 4,916 Da after 7 h. Size exclusion chromatography revealed that low-molecular-weight collagen peptides of approximately 1,000-5,000 Da were obtained after hydrolysis with 1% alcalase for 1 h.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by Wonkwang University in 2022.

참고문헌

  1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S. 2007. Disease and development: the effect of life expectancy on economic growth. J. Poli. Econ. 115: 925-985.  https://doi.org/10.1086/529000
  2. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2021. Food and Drug Industry Trend Statistics. 
  3. Khiari Z, Ndagijimana M, Betti M. 2014. Low molecular weight bioactive peptides derived from the enzymatic hydrolysis of collagen after isoelectric solubilization/precipitation process of turkey by-products. Poult. Sci. 93: 2347-2362.  https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-03953
  4. Sionkowska A, Skrzynski S, Smiechowski K, Kolodziejczak A. 2017. The review of versatile application of collagen. Poly. Adv. Technol. 28: 4-9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3842
  5. Zhao X, Zhang X, Liu D. 2021. Collagen peptides and the related synthetic peptides: a review on improving skin health. J. Funct. Foods 86: 104680. 
  6. Wang H. 2021. A review of the effects of collagen treatment in clinical studies. Polymers 13: 3868. 
  7. Lugo JP, Saiyed ZM, Lau FC, Molina JP, Pakdaman MN, Shamie AN, et al. 2013. Undenatured type II collagen (UC-II®) for joint support: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 10: 48. 
  8. Asserin J, Lati E, Shioya T, Prawitt J. 2015. The effect of oral collagen peptide supplementation on skin moisture and the dermal collagen network: evidence from an ex vivo model and randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 14: 291-301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12174
  9. Li P, Wu G. 2018. Roles of dietary glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline in collagen synthesis and animal growth. Amino Acids 50: 29-38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2490-6
  10. Silva CML, Spinelli E, Rodrigues SV. 2015. Fast and sensitive collagen quantification by alkaline hydrolysis/hydroxyproline assay. Food Chem. 173: 619-623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.073
  11. Koopman R, Crombach N, Gijsen AP, Walrand S, Fauquant J, Kies AK, et al. 2009. Ingestion of a protein hydrolysate is accompanied by an accelerated in vivo digestion and absorption rate when compared with its intact protein. Am. J. Clin. Nut. 90: 106-115.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.27474
  12. Huang CY, Wu CH, Yang JI, Li YH, Kuo JM. 2015. Evaluation of iron-binding activity of collagen peptides prepared from the scales of four cultivated fishes in Taiwan. J. Food Drug Anal. 23: 671-678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.06.009
  13. Harris M, Potgieter J, Ishfaq K, Shahzad M. 2021. Developments for collagen hydrolysate in biological, biochemical, and biomedical domains: a comprehensive review. Materials 14: 2806. 
  14. Santana JCC, Gardim RB, Almeida PF, Borini GB, Quispe APB, Llanos SAV, et al. 2020. Valorization of chicken feet by-product of the poultry industry: high qualities of gelatin and biofilm from extraction of collagen. Polymers 12: 529. 
  15. Dhakal D, Koomsap P, Lamichhane A, Sadiq MB, Anal AK. 2018. Optimization of collagen extraction from chicken feet by papain hydrolysis and synthesis of chicken feet collagen based biopolymeric fibres. Food Biosci. 23: 23-30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2018.03.003
  16. Delgado LM, Shologu N, Fuller K, Zeugolis DI. 2017. Acetic acid and pepsin result in high yield, high purity and low macrophage response collagen for biomedical applications. Biomed. Mater. 12: 065009. 
  17. Jayathilakan K, Sultana K, Radhakrishna K, Bawa AS. 2012. Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49: 278-293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0290-7
  18. AOAC. 2016. Method 928.08. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC Intl., 20th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Rockville, MD, USA. 
  19. Kolar K. 1990. Colorimetric determination of hydroxyproline as measure of collagen content in meat and meat products: NMKL collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 73: 54-57.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/73.1.54
  20. Edwards CA, O'Brien WD. 1980. Modified assay for determination of hydroxyproline in a tissue hydrolyzate. Clin. Chim. Acta 104: 161-167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(80)90192-8
  21. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural protein during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685.  https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
  22. Widyasari R, Rawdkuen S. 2014. Extraction and characterization of gelatin from chicken feet by acid and ultrasound assisted extraction. Food Appl. Biosci. J. 2: 85-97. 
  23. Potti RB, Fahad MO. 2017. Extraction and characterization of collagen from broiler chicken feet (Gallus gallus domesticus) - biomolecules from poultry waste. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 11: 315-322.  https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.11.1.39
  24. Hong H, Fan H, Chalamaiah M, Wu J. 2019. Preparation of low-molecular-weight, collagen hydrolysates (peptides): current progress, challenges, and future perspectives. Food Chem. 301: 125222. 
  25. Zhang Y, Olsen K, Grossi A, Otte J. 2013. Effect of pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis of bovine collagen and formation of ACE-inhibitory peptides. Food Chem. 141: 2343-2354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.058
  26. Antosova Z, Mackova M, Kral V, Macek T. 2009. Therapeutic application of peptides and proteins: parenteral forever? Trends Biotechnol. 27: 628-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.07.009