DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Improving Environmental Impact Assessment of Carbon Sink in the Greenhouse Gas Evaluation Criteria for Railway Construction Projects for Carbon Neutrality

탄소 중립을 위한 철도 건설 사업 온실가스 평가항목의 탄소흡수원 분야 환경영향평가 개선 방안 연구

  • Hwang, Jin-hoo (Ojeong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Namuun, Tuvshinjargal (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Won, Joo-hee (Policy Development Division, Future Strategy Development Research Institute, Korea National Railway) ;
  • Kim, Min-jeong (Policy Development Division, Future Strategy Development Research Institute, Korea National Railway) ;
  • Park, Da-hye (Policy Development Division, Future Strategy Development Research Institute, Korea National Railway) ;
  • Jeon, Seong-woo (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 황진후 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스연구원) ;
  • ;
  • 원주희 (국가철도공단 미래전략연구원 정책개발처 ) ;
  • 김민정 (국가철도공단 미래전략연구원 정책개발처 ) ;
  • 박다혜 (국가철도공단 미래전략연구원 정책개발처 ) ;
  • 전성우 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부)
  • Received : 2023.04.28
  • Accepted : 2023.06.26
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

The railway project is an essential green transportation tool that is considered suitable for the domestic and foreign policy direction of carbon neutrality, but there are some limitations, such as damaging important carbon absorption sources during construction. This study analyzed the environmental impact assessment related to carbon absorption sources of greenhouse gas evaluation items conducted during the railway project, and limitations and implications were derived. The analysis of environmental impact assessment guidelines related to railway projects and carbon absorption sources dealt with prediction and reduction methods related to carbon absorption sources, but guidelines, including environmentally friendly railway construction guidelines, lacked descriptions. Since the greenhouse gas environmental impact assessment, 83 railway project environmental impact assessments have been reviewed, but in some cases, carbon absorption-related predictions have not been implemented, or carbon absorption-related reduction measures have been insufficient. In addition, there were cases where there was a limit to calculating emissions and reduction or where the reduction value was insignificant compared to emissions. In order to supplement the environmental impact assessment in the field of carbon absorption sources related to railway construction projects, alternatives such as quantitative emission and low reduction calculation, review of the no net loss system using the total environmental resource system, and linkage with climate change impact assessment are needed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국가철도공단에서 발주하여 2023년 한국환경복원기술학회에서 수행한 "철도사업 탄소흡수원 복원을 위한 연구용역"의 일부분을 발전시켰으며, 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 생태계 기반 탄소흡수원 조성관리 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다.(RS-2023-00218243).

References

  1. Cho KJ.Lee HS.Sin GH and Kim JJ. 2009. An Efficient Environmental Impact Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Items. Korea Environment Institute. Seoul. KOREA.
  2. Choi YY.Cho HJ.Hwang JH.Kim YJ.Lim NO.Lee JY.Lee JH.Sung MJ.Jeon SW.Sung HC. 2021. Complaint-based Data Demands for Advancement of Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 24(6): 49-65. (in Korean with English Summary)
  3. Choo IK.Seong YJ.Shiksha B and Jung YH. 2021. Calculation of Soil Carbon Changes by Administrative District with Regard to Land Cover Changes. Journal of the Korean Geoenvironmental Society 22(3): 37-43. (in Korean with English Summary)
  4. Government of UK. 2021. Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener. United Kingdom.
  5. Kim BK.Lee JS.Kim HK and Lee JY. 2014. An Analysis of Energy Consumption and GHG Emission per Unit of Rail and Road Transportation. Journal of the Korean Society for Railway 17(3): 216-222. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2014.17.3.216
  6. Kim MK.Kim DY and Hwang DK. 2020. Study on the Application of Environmental Impact Assessment for Railway Development Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Journal of the Korean Society for Railway 23(7): 625-636. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2020.23.7.625
  7. Hong SP. 2019. Improvement of EIA Associated with Greenhouse Gases Subject Matter for the Preparedness of Post-2020. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 28(5): 1225-7184. (in Korean with English Summary)
  8. Hwang JH.Jang RI and Jeon SW. 2019. Redefine Scope of Protected Zone in Act on the Management and Improvement of Carbon Sink Article 10. Journal of Climate Change Research 10(4): 291-297. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2019.10.4.291
  9. Hwang JH.Jang RI and Jeon SW. 2022. A Study on the Estimation Method of Carbon Storage Using Environmental Spatial Information and InVEST Carbon Model: Focusing on Sejong Special Self-Governing City. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 25(5): 15-27. (in Korean with English Summary)
  10. Hwang JH.Kim YJ.Jeon SW.Choi YY and Sung HC. 2023. Derivation of Data Demand through Analysis of Agreed Terms and Conditions on Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 32(1): 29-40. (in Korean with English Summary)
  11. Hwang SI and Park SH. 2010. Environmental Impact Assessment for Development Projects Considering Carbon Sink and Sequestration(I). Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 19(6): 625-631. (in Korean with English Summary)
  12. IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, IGES, JAPAN.
  13. Jang JY․Cho NW and Lee MJ. 2019. Standardization Plan for Activation of Environmental Impact Assessment based on Spatial Information. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(3): 433-446. (in Korean with English Summary)
  14. Jeong HM.Kim HR.Kim DY.Jang IU and Kang SR. 2022. Improvement on Estimation Methodology of Carbon Storage amount by Damaged Trees for Environmental Impact Assessment. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 55(4): 330-340. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2022.55.4.330
  15. Kim JO and Joo YJ. 2021. Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Re-consulting System - A Comparative Analysis of Korea and Foreign Countries. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 30(5): 328-338. (in Korean with English Summary)
  16. Korea University Consortium. 2022. A study on the establishment of a maintenance plan for the total amount of environmental resources in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province. KOREA.
  17. Lee DH.Choe HY.Kim JY.Cheong YK.Kil SH. 2022. Carbon neutrality potentials in local governments under different forest management - The Study Case of Paju and Goseong. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 25(3): 17-28. (in Korean with English Summary)
  18. Lee JY.Jung WS.Hwang IH and Kim YK. 2011. The Evaluation of GHG Emissions in Railroad Construction Sector. Journal of the Korean Society for Railway. 14(3): 271-275. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2011.14.3.271
  19. Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2015. Guidelines for Construction of Environmentally Friendly Railways.
  20. Ministry of Environment. 2023. Guide to the Preparation, etc. of Environmental Impact Assessment Report, etc.
  21. Ministry of Environment. 2023. Regulations on the Preparation, etc. of Environmental Impact Assessment Report, etc.
  22. Park JH and Choi JG. 2018. A study on the Improvement of the EIA Items and the Operating System Based on the Analysis of EIA Item Usage. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment. 27(1): 1-16. (in Korean with English Summary)
  23. The European Rail Research Advisory Council. 2017. Rail 2050 Vision. BELGIUM.
  24. Yun HY. 2005. A Study on the Legal and Institutional Improvement Strategies by Kyoto-Protocol in Forest Sector. Environmental Law Review, 27(4): 185-204 (in Korean with English Summary)