DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modern Linguistics: Theoretical Aspects of the Development of Cognitive Semantics

  • Nataliia Mushyrovska (Department of Stylistics and Culture of the Ukrainian Language, Rivne State University оf Humanities) ;
  • Liudmyla Yursa (Department of Ukrainian Applied Linguistics, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv) ;
  • Oksana Neher (Uzhhorod national University) ;
  • Iryna Pavliuk (Faculty of Foreign Languages, Department of English Philology, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University)
  • Received : 2023.06.05
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

This article presents an examination of the major cognitive-semantic theories in linguistics (Langacker, Lakoff, Fillmore, Croft). The CST's foundations are discussed concerning the educational policy changes, which are necessary to improve the linguistic disciplines in the changing context of higher education, as well as the empowerment and development of the industry. It is relevant in the light of the linguistic specialists' quality training and the development of effective methods of language learning. Consideration of the theories content, tools, and methods of language teaching, which are an important component of quality teaching and the formation of a set of knowledge and skills of students of linguistic specialties, remains crucial. This study aims to establish the main theoretical positions and directions of cognitive-semantic theory in linguistics, determine the usefulness of teaching the basics of cognitive linguistics, the feasibility of using methods of cognitive-semantic nature in the learning process. During the research, the methods of linguistic description and observation, analysis, and synthesis were applied. The result of the study is to establish the need to study basic linguistic theories, as well as general theoretical precepts of cognitive linguistics, which remains one of the effective directions in the postmodern mainstream. It also clarifies the place of the main cognitive-semantic theories in the teaching linguistics' practice of the XXI century.

Keywords

References

  1. W. Croft, "Functional Approaches to Grammar", International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 2015, рр. 470-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53009-8
  2. C. C. M. Goh, and A. Burns, "Teaching speaking: A holistic approach", New York: Cambridge, 2012. 301 p.
  3. A. Goldberg, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure", University Of Chicago Press, 1995, 271 p.
  4. P. D. Hapsari and F. Wirawan, "The Significant Connection between Communicative Competence and Cognitive Ability in Speaking English of English Debating Team", Humaniora, 2018, 9(2), рр. 149-159 https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v9i2.4492
  5. C. Fillmore, J. Kay and M. O'Connor, "Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: the Case of let alone", Language, 1988, 64 (3), рр. 501-538 https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
  6. C. Findik and S. Ozkan, "A model for instructors' adoption of learning management systems: Empirical validation in higher education context", Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2013, 12(2), рр. 13-25. Available: http://www.tojet.net
  7. M. Fried, "Constructions and Frames as Interpretive Clues", Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 2010, 24, рр. 83-102 https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.24.04fri
  8. L. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, A. Malone, P. Seethaler and C. Craddock, "The Role of Cognitive Processes in Treating Mathematics Learning Difficulties Mathematical Cognition and Learning", Cognitive Foundations for Improving Mathematical Learning, 2019, 5, рр. 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815952-1.00012-8
  9. K. Kiki-Papadakis and F. Chaimala, "The Embedment of Responsible Research and Innovation Aspects in European Science Curricula", Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 2016, 8(2), рр. 71-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/2016.0802.06
  10. J. Ko, P. Sammons and L. Bakkum, "Effective Teaching: a review of research and evidence", CfBT Education Trust, 2013. Available: http://cdn.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2013/reffectiveteaching-2013.pdf
  11. G. Lakoff, "The contemporary theory of metaphor", Metaphor and thought, Cambridge, 1993, 245 p.
  12. R. W. Langacker, "Concept, Image, and Symbol", Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991, 405 р.
  13. R. W. Langacker, "Grammar and Conceptualization", Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999, 427 р.
  14. M. Lemmens, "Cognitive semantics", Routledge Handbook of Semantics, London & New York: Routledge, 2015, рр. 90-105.
  15. S. Levinson, "Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003, 389 р. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609
  16. M. Takimoto, "Investigating the effects of cognitive linguistic approach in developing EFL learners' pragmatic proficiency", System, 202089,102213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102213.
  17. F. Perek, "Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar, Experimental and corpus-based perspectives", Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2015. 256 р.
  18. I. Rababah, "The Reality of Using Modern Teaching Methods in Teaching Arabic for Speakers of other Languages from Teachers' Perspective", 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2020.9.1.58.94
  19. H. Sytar, "Konstruktsiyna hramatyka yak teoretychne pidgruntya doslidzhennya frazeolohizovanykh rechen'", Typolohiya ta funktsiyi movnykh odynyts', 2015, 2 (4), рр. 192-205. Available: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/7092/1/192-205.pdf
  20. H. Synorub and O. Medynska, "Development of information culture of students of humanitarian specialities", Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2019, 72(4), рр. 152-167. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v72i4.2922
  21. J. R. Taylor, "The Mental Corpus: How Language is Represented in the Mind". Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012384 р. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001
  22. M. Tendahl and R. Gibbs, "Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory", Journal of Pragmatics, 2008, 40(11), рр. 1823-1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001.
  23. M. Tomasello, "Language is not an instinct", Cognitive Development, 1995, 10, рр. 131-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(95)90021-7