International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology

Research Institute for Knowledge Content Development & Technology (건국대학교 지식콘텐츠연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Authorship Pattern & Research Collaboration of Bifurcation Research During 2016-2020: A Scientometric Analysis

  • Dillip Kumar Parida (Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar) ;
  • Satyajit Nayak (Knowledge Resource Centre, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute)
  • Received : 2022.07.26
  • Accepted : 2022.12.29
  • Published : 2023.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study depicts a Scientometric technique of Bifurcation Research output in India for around five years during 2016-2020. It is an active field of analysis in which the bulk of investigation is being done. Scopus is an advanced research platform, assisting in finding, probing and yielding information in the sciences, social sciences, arts, and humanities. The contemporary study discusses the "Bifurcation" as reflected in SCOPUS for 2016-2020. This study examines the highly prolific authors, document type etc. The study exhibited that 2017 shown maximum research papers 1700 (20.44%), the lowermost maturity rate was deciphered in 2018 (19.65%), the standard value of the period of collaboration is 0.18. The time series examines for single-authored, multi-authored, and collaborative papers are 137.8, 1564 and 1701.8 respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Bales, M. E., Dine, D. C., Merrill, J. A., Johnson, S. B., Bakken, S., & Weng, C. (2014). Associating co-authorship patterns with publications in high-impact journals. Journal of biomedical informatics, 52, 311-318.
  2. Elango, B., & Rajendran, P. (2012). Authorship trends and collaboration pattern in the marine sciences literature: a scientometric study. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 2(3), 166-169.
  3. Khaparde, V., & Pawar, S. (2013). Authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in Information Technology. Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 1(1), 46-54.
  4. Mooghali, A., Alijani, R., Karami, N., & Khasseh, A. A. (2012). Scientometric analysis of the scientometric literature. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 9(1), 19-31.
  5. Nayak, S. (2018). Research output of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology: A Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 8(1), 174-180.
  6. Nayak, S., Hari, P. K., & Verma, N. (2021). Research Trends in Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS): A Bibliometric Review from 2011-2021. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 6584. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6584
  7. Nayak, S., Parida, D. K., Verma, N., & Hari, P. K. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis of the ASLIB Journal of Information Management from 2014 to 2021. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 6605. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6605
  8. Parida, D. K., & Nayak, S. (2021). Research Trends in Evidence based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) from 2011-2020: A Citation analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 6484. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6484
  9. Parida, D. K., Singh, K., Kuri, R., Pradhan, A., Gireesh Kumar, T. K., & Singh, M. (2020). Research Productivity and Visualization of the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhubaneswar during 2012-2019: A Scientometric Approach. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 4639, 1-16. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4639
  10. Pillai, K. G. S. (2007). Authorship patterns in physics literature: An informetric study on citations in doctoral theses of the Indian Institute of Science. Annals of Library and Information Studies 54, 90-94.
  11. Pinter, A. (2013). Changing trends in authorship patterns in the JPS: Publish or perish. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 48(2), 412-417.
  12. Rajendran, P., Jeyshankar, R., & Elango, B. (2011). Scientometric analysis of contributions to journal of scientific and industrial research. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 1(2), 79-89.
  13. Scopus. (2021, January). Retrieved January 5, 2021, from https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic
  14. Singh, K., Nayak, S., & Varma, A. K. (2017). A scientometric analysis of partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research (2010-2016). International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 7(3), 81-88.
  15. Singh, K., Singh, M., Patel, A. K., TK, G. K., & Nayak, S. (2021). Research Productivity of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology: A Bibliometric Review. 5703. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5703
  16. Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of information Science, 6(1), 33-38.
  17. Velmurugan, C., & N. Radhakrishnan. (2015). Scientometric observations of Authorship Trends and Collaborative Research on DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. Collnet J Scientometrics Informat Management, 9(2), 193-204.
  18. Wikipedia contributors. (2021, October 17). Bifurcation theory. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifurcation_theory
  19. Zhou T. (2013) Bifurcation. In: Dubitzky W., Wolkenhauer O., Cho K. H., Yokota H.(eds.) Encyclopedia of Systems Biology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_500