DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intraductal ultrasonography for biliary strictures

  • Young Koog Cheon (Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2022.07.03
  • 심사 : 2022.09.06
  • 발행 : 2023.03.30

초록

When diagnosing the nature of biliary strictures, it is sometimes difficult to perform non-invasive methods such as ultrasound, spiral computed imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, or endoscopic ultrasonography. Thus, treatment decisions are usually based on biopsy results. However, brush cytology or biopsy, which is widely used for biliary stenosis, has limitations owing to its low sensitivity and negative predictive value for malignancy. Currently, the most accurate method is bile duct tissue biopsy under direct cholangioscopy. On the other hand, intraductal ultrasonography administered under the guidance of a guidewire has the advantages of easy administration and being less invasive, allowing for adequate examination of the biliary tract and surrounding organs. This review discusses the usefulness and drawbacks of intraductal ultrasonography for biliary strictures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tamada K, Ueno N, Tomiyama T, et al. Characterization of biliary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparison with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:341-349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70216-0
  2. Tamada K, Kurihara K, Tomiyama T, et al. How many biopsies should be performed during percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy to diagnose biliary tract cancer? Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:653-658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(99)80014-5
  3. Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Baron TH, Clain JE, et al. Evaluation of indeterminate bile duct strictures by intraductal US. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:372-379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70041-2
  4. Farrell RJ, Agarwal B, Brandwein SL, et al. Intraductal US is a useful adjunct to ERCP for distinguishing malignant from benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:681-687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70117-X
  5. Menzel J, Poremba C, Dietl KH, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of bile duct strictures: comparison of intraductal ultrasonography with conventional endosonography. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000;35:77-82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/003655200750024579
  6. Tamada K, Ueno N, Ichiyama M, et al. Assessment of pancreatic parenchymal invasion by bile duct cancer using intraductal ultrasonography. Endoscopy 1996;28:492-496.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1005529
  7. Kuroiwa M, Goto H, Hirooka Y, et al. Intraductal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of proximal invasion in extrahepatic bile duct cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;13:715-719.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.1998.tb00719.x
  8. Tamada K, Nagai H, Yasuda Y, et al. Transpapillary intraductal US prior to biliary drainage in the assessment of longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:300-307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(01)70402-6
  9. Noda Y, Fujita N, Kobayashi G, et al. Intraductal ultrasonography before biliary drainage and transpapillary biopsy in assessment of the longitudinal extent of bile duct cancer. Dig Endosc 2008;20:73-78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2008.00779.x
  10. Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Ichiyama M, et al. Influence of biliary drainage catheter on bile duct wall thickness as measured by intraductal ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:28-32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70295-0
  11. Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, et al. The pattern of infiltration at the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases. Ann Surg 1998;227:405-411.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199803000-00013
  12. Tamada K, Ido K, Ueno N, et al. Assessment of hepatic artery invasion by bile duct cancer using intraductal ultrasonography. Endoscopy 1995;27:579-583.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1005761
  13. Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, et al. Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) for the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009;23:729-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2009.05.007