Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

  • 제35권
  • /
  • Pages.50.1-50.11
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-3618(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2052-4374(eISSN)
대한직업환경의학회 (The Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association between receiving work communications outside of work hours via telecommunication devices and work-related headaches and eyestrain: a cross-sectional analysis of the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey

  • Yoon-Soo Jang (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital) ;
  • Jae-Han Lee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital) ;
  • Na-Rae Lee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital) ;
  • Dong-Woo Kim (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital) ;
  • June-Hee Lee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital) ;
  • Kyung-Jae Lee (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.18
  • 심사 : 2023.11.07
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The rise in telecommuting or non-face-to-face work owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has fueled conversations regarding the "right to disconnect." Although evidence suggests that receiving work-related communications through telecommunication devices outside of work hours may lead to various symptoms and illnesses, limited research has been undertaken on these symptoms. This study therefore aims to investigate the correlation between receiving work communications through telecommunication devices after work hours and the occurrence of work-related headaches and eyestrain in full-time, non-shift white-collar workers. Methods: This study used data from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey. The frequency of using telecommunication devices for work purposes outside of working hours was divided into five categories: "Every day," "Several times a week," "Several times a month," "Rarely," and "Never." Work-related headaches and eyestrain were categorized based on a "yes" or "no" response to the survey questions. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0. Results: After adjusting for sex, age, income level, education, occupation, workplace size, work hours, and sleep disorders, the odds ratio (OR) of work-related headaches and eyestrain based on frequency of telecommunication device usage were as follows: "rarely" (OR: 1.292; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.111-1.503), "several times a month" (OR: 1.551; 95% CI: 1.249-1.926), "several times a week" (OR: 1.474; 95% CI: 1.217-1.784), and "every day" (OR: 1.548; 95% CI: 1.321-1.813). Conclusions: Employees who use telecommunication devices for work after regular hours are more susceptible to experiencing work-related headaches and eyestrain compared to those who do not. However, there is a dearth of research examining the physical and mental health impacts of using telecommunication devices for after-hours work. Furthermore, the existing preventative measures in Korea are insufficient. Consequently, it is imperative to develop effective measures and conduct additional research to address this issue.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank the Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute (OSHRI) and the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) for providing raw data from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey.

참고문헌

  1. Lee SG, Lee JH. The use of smart devices at work, issues and improvement plans on working hours - mainly on the KakaoTalk prohibition act after work. J Labor Law 2016;38:145-80. 
  2. Chesalina O. Exploring the right to disconnect in european labour law and in the legislation of the member states: just a matter of working time of employees? In: Wozniak-Jechorek B, Marchewka-Bartkowiak K, editors. Digital Labour Markets in Central and Eastern European Countries: COVID-19 and the Future of Work. New York, NY, USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis; 2023, 193-209. 
  3. Yang SY. A right to disconnect outside of working hours in France - compared with the legislation bills in Korea. Labor Law Review 2019;46:139-81.
  4. Sang Cheol P, Joon K. Does a smart device really enhance quality of life (QoL)?: the moderating effect of technostress and the mediating effect of the work-home balance. Korean Manag Rev 2014;43(5):1707-33. 
  5. Brillhart PE. Technostress in the workplace: Managing stress in the electronic workplace. J Am Acad Bus Camb 2004;5(1/2):302-7. 
  6. Richardson K, Benbunan-Fich R. Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during nonwork time. Inf Organ 2011;21(3):142-60.
  7. Geuna K, Sanghyun K. The relationship between technostress and continuance commitment within organizations: the moderating effects of involvement facilitation and technical support provision. J Soc eBus Stud 2015;20(1):153-66.
  8. Choi BY, Min JY, Ryoo SW, Min KB. Use of work-related communication technology outside regular working hours and work-family conflict (work interference with family and family interference with work): results from the 6th Korean working conditions survey. Ann Occup Environ Med 2022;34(1):e44.
  9. Arlinghaus A, Nachreiner F. When work calls-associations between being contacted outside of regular working hours for work-related matters and health. Chronobiol Int 2013;30(9):1197-202.
  10. Hang-Hang C, Hyeok-Gi K. The influence of work delivery using SNS out of duty hours on job performance. J Digit Converg 2022;20(2):107-16. 
  11. Choi SS, Yun TH. The influence of work orders using social networking service after working hours on job stress, burnout and WLB: focused on hotel employees. J Tourism Leis Res 2020;32(7):333-48.
  12. Wang Ro L, Suk Bong C. The effects of job order using SNS after work hours on work-family conflict and psychological well-being of Korean employees: mediating effect of job stress. Korean J Hum Resour Dev 2018;21(4):77-99.
  13. Santos IS, Griep RH, Alves MG, Goulart AC, Lotufo PA, Barreto SM, et al. Job stress is associated with migraine in current workers: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Eur J Pain 2014;18(9):1290-7.
  14. Tynes T, Johannessen HA, Sterud T. Work-related psychosocial and organizational risk factors for headache: a 3-year follow-up study of the general working population in Norway. J Occup Environ Med 2013;55(12):1436-42.
  15. de Kok J, Vroonhof P, Verhoeven W, Timmermans N, Kwaak T, Snijders J, et al. Do SMEs Create More and Better Job? Brussels, Belgium: EIM Office in Brussels; 2011. 
  16. Lai Y, Saridakis G, Blackburn R. Job stress in the United Kingdom: are small and medium-sized enterprises and large enterprises different? Stress Health 2015;31(3):222-35.
  17. Shin S, Yang EH, Lee HC, Moon SH, Ryoo JH. The relationship between visual display terminal usage at work and symptoms related to computer vision syndrome. Ann Occup Environ Med 2023;35(1):e1.
  18. Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Lost workdays and decreased work effectiveness associated with headache in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 1997;39(4):320-7.
  19. Liu S, Dong H, Fang S, Zhang L. Risk of dry eye in headache patients: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Ann Med 2022;54(1):2876-85.
  20. Magnavita N. Headache in the workplace: analysis of factors influencing headaches in terms of productivity and health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(6):3712.
  21. Broman JE, Smedje H, Mallon L, Hetta J. The Minimal Insomnia Symptom Scale (MISS): a brief measure of sleeping difficulties. Ups J Med Sci 2008;113(2):131-42.
  22. Hwang J, Cho SS, Kim JI. Association between insomnia and absenteeism or presenteeism among Korean employees. Ann Occup Environ Med 2022;34(1):e41.
  23. Kim T, Kang MY, Yoo MS, Lee D, Hong YC. Computer use at work is associated with self-reported depressive and anxiety disorder. Ann Occup Environ Med 2016;28(1):57.
  24. Houle T, Nash JM. Stress and headache chronification. Headache 2008;48(1):40-4.
  25. Piazza JR, Charles ST, Sliwinski MJ, Mogle J, Almeida DM. Affective reactivity to daily stressors and long-term risk of reporting a chronic physical health condition. Ann Behav Med 2013;45(1):110-20.
  26. Martin PR, Lae L, Reece J. Stress as a trigger for headaches: relationship between exposure and sensitivity. Anxiety Stress Coping 2007;20(4):393-407.
  27. Schoellbauer J, Sonnentag S, Prem R, Korunka C. I'd rather know what to expect…Work unpredictability as contemporary work stressor with detrimental implications for employees daily wellbeing. Work Stress 2022;36(3):274-91.
  28. Sonnentag S, Fritz C. Recovery from job stress: the stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. J Organ Behav 2015;36(S1):S72-103.
  29. Cropley M, Zijlstra FRH. Work and rumination. In: Langan-Fox J, Cooper CL, editors. Handbook of Stress in the Occupations. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2011, 487-501. 
  30. Jeon YJ. The effect of work-related contact using ICT during nonworking hours on affective rumination, work-family conflict and emotional exhaustion: focused on hotel and duty-free shop employees. J Tourism Leis Res 2021;33(2):407-23.
  31. Querstret D, Cropley M. Exploring the relationship between work-related rumination, sleep quality, and work-related fatigue. J Occup Health Psychol 2012;17(3):341-53.
  32. Melo JM, Campanini MZ, Souza SC, Andrade SM, Gonzalez AD, Jimenez-Lopez E, et al. Work-related rumination and worry at bedtime are associated with worse sleep indicators in schoolteachers: a study based on actigraphy and sleep diaries. Sleep Med 2021;80:113-7.
  33. Cropley M, Rydstedt LW, Devereux JJ, Middleton B. The relationship between work-related rumination and evening and morning salivary cortisol secretion. Stress Health 2015;31(2):150-7.
  34. Demirci S, Demirci K, Akgonul M. Headache in smartphone users: a cross-sectional study. J Neurol Psychol 2016;4(1):5. 
  35. Montagni I, Guichard E, Carpenet C, Tzourio C, Kurth T. Screen time exposure and reporting of headaches in young adults: a cross-sectional study. Cephalalgia 2016;36(11):1020-7.