한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제43권3호
  • /
  • Pages.321-331
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고등학생을 위한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용

The Development and Application of a Science Education Program Based on Engineering Design Process for High School Students

  • 투고 : 2023.06.08
  • 심사 : 2023.06.13
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 고등학교 학생을 위한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램을 개발하고, 이를 적용하여 고등학생의 과학 관련 태도와 공학 설계 능력에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램은 '바른 자세를 유지할 수 있는 건강 신발 만들기'이며 공학 설계 과정인 문제 정의, 정보 수집, 창안, 구현, 평가 및 반성 등의 과정을 거쳐 학생이 일상생활의 문제를 해결하기 위해 공학 설계 과정을 방법론적으로 사용하여 창의적인 해결방안을 창안할 수 있는 활동으로 구성하였다. 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육프로그램을 적용한 결과, 고등학생의 과학 관련 태도와 공학 설계 능력이 향상되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램은 고등학생의 과학 관련 태도와 공학 설계 능력 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 주고 있으며, 앞으로의 미래 과학 인재 양성을 위한 교수 학습 전략으로서 과학 교육에서 공학 설계 과정을 접목한 활동의 지속적인 운영과 확대가 필요함을 시사한다.

This study aimed to develop an engineering design-based science education program for high school students and to investigate its effects on students' science-related attitudes and engineering design abilities. "Creating healthy shoes for maintaining proper posture program" was developed as an activity to come up with creative solutions using the methodology of an engineering design process to solve problems in daily life. The creating healthy shoes for maintaining proper posture program consisted of the following five stages: "defining the problem," "ingathering information related to the problem," "generating the solution," "implementing the best solution," and "evaluating the solution & reflecting." As a result of applying this engineering design-based science education program, it improved the high school students' science-related attitudes and engineering design abilities. Therefore, the program developed in this study has a positive effect on enhancing high school students' science-related attitudes and engineering design abilities. These findings imply that the continuous operation and expansion of activities incorporating an engineering design process in science education are necessary as a teaching and learning strategy for cultivating future science talents.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A5B5A17091886)

참고문헌

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2021). Criteria for accrediting engineering program. Retrieved from Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology website: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022-23-ETAC-Criteria.pdf
  2. Aldahmash, A. H., & Alfarraj, Y. F. (2022). Exploring the integration of engineering design practices in tenth-grade chemistry activities. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 774022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.774022
  3. Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6
  4. Asunda, P. A., & Hill, R. B. (2017). Critical features of engineering design in technology education. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 44(1), 25-48.
  5. Bang, H. K., & Leem, Y. M. (2015). A study on shirts design for postural stability of teenagers considering human sensibility ergonomics. Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, 17(1), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2015.17.1.139
  6. Burghardt, M. D. (2013). Interconnected STEM with engineering design pedagogy. Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/19811.
  7. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design; A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6-8.
  8. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2009). Perspectives on K-12 engineering. Retrieved from http://www.hofstra.edu/academics/colleges/seas/ctl/ctl_k12engr.html.
  9. Budynas, R. G., & Nisbett, J. K. (2015). Shigley's mechanical engineering design (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  10. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design; a contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. The Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6-8.
  11. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classroom. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
  12. Capobianco, B. M., & Rupp, M. (2014). STEM teachers' planned and enacted attempts at implementing engineering design-based instruction. School Science & Mathematics, 114(6), 258-270.
  13. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?. Psychological bulletin, 143(1), 1-35.
  14. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
  15. Cho C. Y. (2008). Survey of faulty postures and associated factors among Chinese adolescents. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 31(3), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.02.003
  16. Cho, S., Ku, N. W., Kim, H., Lee, S., & Lee, I. (2019). OECD Programme for international students assessment: An analysis of PISA 2018 Result. (RRE 2019-11). Chungbuk: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  17. Choi, Y. (2009). Graduate students' perceptions on the characteristics and types of good teamwork. Asian Journal of Education, 10(3), 257-283. https://doi.org/10.15753/AJE.2009.10.3.012012
  18. Choi, Y. (2021). Exploring the perception of integrated STEAM secondary teachers on engineering design. Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 364-378. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2021.45.3.364
  19. Chong, H. R., Hong, S. H., Lee, M. K., & Kwon, H. M. (2018). Quality strategy in the age of the 4th industrial revolution by technological evolution, Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 46(3), 483-496.
  20. Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design method: strategies for product design (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
  21. Daugherty, M. K. (2009). The "T" and "E" in STEM. in international technology education association (Ed.), The overlooked STEM imperatives: technology and engineering K-12 education (pp. 18-25). VA: International Technology Education Association.
  22. Dieter, G., & Schmidt, L. C. (2013). Engineering design (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
  23. Dym, C. L., Little, P., & Orwin, E. (2013). Engineering design: a project-based introduction (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
  24. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.
  25. Duong, X., Nguyen, N., Nguyen, M., & Thao-Do, T. (2022). Applying STEM engineering design process through designing and making of electrostatic painting equipment in two rural schools in Vietnam. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 1-10.. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.31004
  26. Ellefson, M. R., Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Design-based learning for biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 292-298.
  27. Firesmith, D. (2007). Common requirements problems, their negative consequences, and the industry best practices to help solve them. Journal of Object Technology, 6(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2007.6.1.c2
  28. Guzey, S. S., & Aranda, M. L. (2017). Student participation in engineering practices and discourse: An exploratory case study. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 585-606.
  29. Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Morse, G. (2016). Student interest in engineering design based science. School Science & Mathematics, 116(8), 411-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12198
  30. Hah, J., & Kim, M. S.(2010). The development of creative problem finding/problem solving model for scientific gifted student. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 6(1), 17-33.
  31. Haik, Y., & Shahin, T. (2011). Engineering design process (2nd ed.). Stamford: Cengage Learning.
  32. Han, H. J. (2018). Development and application of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kongju National University of Education, Gongju, South Korea). Retrieved from http://dcollection.kongju.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000027992.
  33. Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pac. Sci. Educ. 2019, 5, 1-18.
  34. Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2021). An analysis of elements of an engineering design process presented in inquiry activities in high school scientific inquiry-experiment textbooks. Teacher Education Research, 60(1), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.15812/TER.60.1.202103.157
  35. Han, J. (2011). Improvement of self-directed learning ability through engineering design education. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 14(1), 67-76.
  36. Han, J. Y., & Bang, J. H. (2011). A Study on estimating the weight of teamwork skill components for engineering Students. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 11(2), 18-37.
  37. Han, S. W., & Kim, W. J. (2016). A study on the effects of communicative competence on Information literacy of undergraduates. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(1), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.377
  38. Harris, K., & Rogers, G. E. (2008). Secondary engineering competencies: A delphi study of engineering faculty. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 45(1), 5-25.
  39. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  40. Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design studies, 29(2), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001
  41. Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D., & Carberry, A. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses (report no. 165). Retrieved from May 23, 2023 from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/165
  42. Hwang, S. (2017). Relationships between teamwork skills and thinking styles in engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 20(2), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2017.20.2.39
  43. Jay, E. S. & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding; the search for mechnism. In M.A. Runco(Ed), The Creativity Research Handbook Volume One(pp.257-293). Hampton Press, NJ; Cresskill.
  44. Jeon, J. H., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Qualitative Analysis of the Creative Design Process of Elementary School Students in STEAM Class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 93-109.
  45. Jeong, E., Park, J., Lee, S., Yoon, H. G., Kim, H., Kang, H., Lee, J., Kim, Y., & Jeong, J. (2022). A qualitative study on the cause of low science affective achievement of elementary, middle, and high school students in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 42(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2022.42.3.325
  46. Jin, S. A. (2019). Case Study and Industry Demand Investigation on technological convergence education related to the 4th industrial revolution: Focused on electronics, software, and automobile. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(2), 36-48.
  47. Jo, Y., & Yun, Y.(2014). A comparison of the mathematics curriculum of Korea and Japan in viewpoint of promotion of key competencies. Journal of Educational Reserach in Mathmatics, 24(1), 45-65.
  48. Johnson, S. D. (1987). Teaching problem solving. The Technology Teacher, 46(5), 15-17.
  49. Johri, A., Williams, C.B., & Pembridge, J.J. (2013). Creative collaboration: A case study of the role of computers in supporting representational and relational interaction in student engineering design teams. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29, 33-44.
  50. Jung, H. M., & Kim, Y. S. (2006). High school students' posture management behavior and related factors. Journal of the Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health, 10(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0097-8
  51. Kang, I., Kim, H., & Kim, D. (2012). A case study on the learning effects of the STEAM education using open-source softwares in terms of students' interest in and attitudes toward science. Secondary Education Reserach, 60(4), 1105-1134. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2012.60.4.1105
  52. Kang, G. A., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. J. (2015). Exploration of problem solving program including creative thinking skills in the idea generation and verification stages as method for fostering creativity of elementary school student. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2015.34.1.095
  53. Khandani, S. (2005). Engineering design process. Retrieved from May 23, 2023 from http://saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ME101-4.1-Engineering-Design-Process.pdf
  54. Kim, H. J., & Park, S. S. (2018). Operational implication of R-WeSET program through women students and companies' perception and assessment on the basis of NCS key competency. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 21(1), 27-36.
  55. Kim, J., & Chung, J. (2015). Analyzing structural relationships between team leadership, team process and team effectiveness in project-based learning for engineering students. Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 909-948. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.31.4.909
  56. Kim, N. H., & Shim, K. C. (2017). Educational implications for science education of STEAM-based research and education(STEAM R&E) projects for secondary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 125-133.
  57. Kim, Y., Huh, H., Lee, C., & Kim, K. (2013). A study on engineering professionals' recognition about engineering education in primary and Secondary School. Korean Institute of Industrial Educations, 38(2), 136-155.
  58. Kim, Y., Kang, J., & Heo, N. (2015). An analysis on scientifically gifted students' image and perception of the engineering. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.1.95
  59. Kim, W. (2012). Building conceptual framework to bring up talents capable of creative fusion: From the perspective of fusion between science and technology and art. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 11(1), 97-119.
  60. Kuk, S. (2021). Analyse der argumentationsstruktur und - typologie von fake news - am beispiel der fake news uber Covid-19. Koreanische Zeitschrift fur Germanistik, 62(1), 349-366.
  61. Kwak, Y., Kim, C. J., Lee, Y. R., & Jeong, D. S. (2006). Investigation on elementary and secondary students' interest in science. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 260-268.
  62. Kwon, H., & Park, K. (2009). Engineering design: A facilitator for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [STEM] Education. Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2009.33.2.207
  63. Kwon, S. (2017). Exploring the background of integrating engineering design and technical writing. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(4), 203-241.
  64. Lammi, M., Denson, C., & Asunda, P. (2018). Search and review of the literature on engineering design challenges in secondary school settings. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 8(2), 49-66.
  65. Lee, D., Yi, H., & Nam, Y. (2023). The effect of engineering design based ocean clean up lesson on STEAM attitude and creative engineering problem solving propensity. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 44(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2023.44.1.79
  66. Lee, D., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. J. (2014). The introduction of design thinking to science education and exploration of its characterizations as a method for group creativity education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 93-105.
  67. Lee, H., Park, K., Kwon, H., & Seo, B. (2013). Development and implementation of engineering design and scientific inquiry based STEM education program. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 301-326.
  68. Lee, H., Kwon, D., Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2022). Effect analysis on attitudes towards STEM and career perception according to the development and application of STEM thinking classroom program to improve math and science competency of secondary school students. Teacher Education Research, 61(2), 231-246.
  69. Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., & Oh, H. (2014). Development and application of integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education model based on scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0063
  70. Lee, J., & Jang, S. (2016). The effects of design-based learning on elementary students' interaction process, conceptual understanding, and attitude toward science. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(1), 1103-1124.
  71. Lee, J., Ku. J., Choi, W., Shim, K. C., & Shin, M. K. (2020). Analysis of achievement characteristics by achievement standard of the middle school curriculum based on the national assessment of educational achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 473-483. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.5.473
  72. Lee, J. Y., & Shim, K. C. (2019). The effect of problem-based STEAM program on the science-related attitudes, and the perception about the STEAM instruction for high school students. Biology Education, 47(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2019.47.1.59
  73. Lee, Y. E., & Lee, H. (2014). The effects of engineering design and scientific inquiry based STEAM education programs on the interest, self-efficacy and career choices of middle school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 18(3), 513-540. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2014.18.3.513
  74. Lim, J., Ryu, K., & Kim, B. (2017). An Exploratory Study on the Direction of Education and Teacher Competencies in the 4th Industrial Revolution. The Journal of Korean Education, 44(2), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.22804/JKE.2017.44.2.001
  75. Massachusetts Department of Education (MDE). (2006). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Malden: Massachusetts Department of Education.
  76. Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71-85.
  77. Meier, S. L., Hovde, R. L., & Meier, R. L. (1996). Problem solving: teachers' perceptions, content area models, and interdisciplinary connections. School Science and Mathematics, 96(5), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10234.x
  78. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015). Science national curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  79. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2020). The master plan for science education (2020-2024). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  80. Nam, Y., Lee, S. J., & Paik, S. H. (2016) The impact of engineering integrated science (EIS) curricula on first-year technical high school students' attitudes toward science and perceptions of engineering. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science& Technology Education 12(7). 1881-1907.
  81. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  82. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
  83. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
  84. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Schooling for tomorrow: Think scenarios,rethink education. Paris, France: OECD.
  85. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Eng ineering desig n: a systematic approach (2nd ed.). (K. Wallace, L. Blessing & F. Bauert, Trans.). London: Springer-Verlag (Original work published 1984).
  86. Park. H. & Baek, Y. S. (2014). Content Standards for K-9 Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 17(4), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2014.17.4.87
  87. Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Jeong, J. S., Lee, E, A., Yu. E., Lee, D., Park, J., & Baek, Y. S. (2012). Developmental study of science education content standards. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,32(4), 729-750. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.729
  88. Park. M. J., & Park, J. S. (2003). Effect of a posture training program on cobb angle and knowledge of posture of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 33(5), 643-650. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2003.33.5.643
  89. Park, N. J., & Choi, E. J. (2006). A study of variables affecting the information literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.3.215
  90. Park, S., Ju, E., & Jang, S. (2020). Analysis of creative ideas of elementary teachers in the "Designing a Vertical Farm" Activity. Biology Education, 48(4), 581-595.
  91. Precharattana, M., Sanium, S., Pongsanon, K., Ritthipravat, P., Chuechote, S., & Kusakunniran, W. (2023). Blended engineering design process learning activities for secondary school students during COVID-19 epidemic: Students' learning activities and perception. Education Sciences, 13(2), 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020159
  92. Roy, R. (1993). Case studies of creativity in innovative product development. Design Studies, 14, 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(93)80016-6
  93. Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding, creativity, and giftedness. Roeper Review, 16(4), 235-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553588
  94. Ryu, J., & Kim, J. (2021). Perspective of college Environment and Career of Gifted Female Students Majoring in Science and Engineering. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 31(4), 499-519. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2021.31.4.499
  95. Ryu, S, G., & Park, J. S. (2008). Relationship Between Problem Finding Ability and Problem Solving Ability in Chemistry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 52(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2008.52.2.179
  96. Shahat, M. A., Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Amri, M. (2022). Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science Through Engineering Design Processes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2291. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121
  97. Shim, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM education, and addressing the issues facing STEAM in the Korean context. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 709-723. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.4.0709
  98. Shin, S., Ha, M., & Lee, J. K. (2018). A comparative study of teacher and student's perception on 'interesting science class'. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(22), 451-476.
  99. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y., Lee, S., Lee, S. Y., Lee, I., & Ha, J. (2020). Research on ways to implement sustainable student-participating science curriculum to improve students' affectional attitudes(Research Report BD2001001). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  100. Song, S. C., Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2017a). A study on the science related attitudes of scientifically middle school gifted students according to gender and talented division. Biology Education, 45(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2017.45.3.355
  101. Song, S. C., Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2017b). A study on perceptions of scientifically gifted middle school students about engineering design process. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 355-370.
  102. Song, C., Son, Y., & Song, C. (2017). Self-management skill and labor market outcome of university graduates. The Journal of Core Competency Education Research, 2(1), 47-67.
  103. Song, S. C., & Shim, K. C. (2017). A study on the awareness of pre-service science teachers about secondary education in future intelligence information society. Biology Education, 45(3), 404-417. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2017.45.3.404
  104. Vale, I., Barbosa, A., Peixoto, A., & Fernandes, F. (2022). Solving problems through engineering design: An exploratory study with pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 12(12), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120889
  105. Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N., & Afifah, R.M.A. (2020). The steps of the engineering design process (EDP) in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345-1360. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.766201
  106. Yi, H., & Nam, Y. (2019). Development and application of engineering based engineering⋅science integrated program for teaching the concept of 'Light' and 'Sound'. School Science Journal, 13(3), 221-224.
  107. You, J. W., & Ryu, D. H. (2016). The effects of extracurricular participation, peer interaction, and student-faculty interaction on the teamwork competency of students majoring in natural sciences. Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 153-178.